-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test coverage for runs without experiments #685
Comments
@rileyjbauer could you help verify we can still create runs without experiment? I suggest we don't enable this functionality if it's not being used, or easy to disable in frontend. instead I think we should create a default experiment and use that in case people want to skip creating one. |
Yes, it is still very easy to create runs without experiments via the UI. A user can simply hit |
This issue should be obsolete with #1089 which places all runs created without an explicit experiment into a "Default" experiment |
* The CLI code isn't actually doing anything when invoked with "junit-and-upload". This was a bug introduced by kubeflow#683 Related to kubeflow#685
eliminate the usage of ContainerOp in testcases and update the testcase accordingly. Signed-off-by: Yihong Wang <[email protected]>
Since we enabled runs without experiments at API level, we need proper test coverages for runs without experiments, e.g. unit tests, e2e tests.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: