Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Revert "Push multi-arch docker image (#18)" #21

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2023
Merged

Revert "Push multi-arch docker image (#18)" #21

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2023

Conversation

njhill
Copy link
Member

@njhill njhill commented Jan 10, 2023

This reverts commit 75d8f4c.

See corresponding comments in kserve/modelmesh#79

@njhill
Revert "Push multi-arch docker image (#18)"
f3768a3 
This reverts commit 75d8f4c.

Signed-off-by: Nick Hill <[email protected]>
ckadner
ckadner approved these changes Jan 10, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@ckadner ckadner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@njhill njhill merged commit 31bd1bf into main Jan 10, 2023
@njhill njhill deleted the revert-multi-arch branch January 10, 2023 20:20
ddelange added a commit to ddelange/rest-proxy that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2023
@ddelange
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/kserve/rest-proxy into patch-1
b20375f 
* 'main' of https://github.com/kserve/rest-proxy:
  chore: Build not push on Pull Request (kserve#22)
  Revert "Push multi-arch docker image (#18)" (kserve#21)
  chore: Update dependencies (#19)
  Push multi-arch docker image (#18)
@ddelange ddelange mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2023
Merged
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ckadner ckadner ckadner approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@njhill @ckadner