forked from docker-archive/runc
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
dmz: use overlayfs to write-protect /proc/self/exe if possible
Commit b999376 ("nsenter: cloned_binary: remove bindfd logic entirely") removed the read-only bind-mount logic from our cloned binary code because it wasn't really safe because a container with CAP_SYS_ADMIN could remove the MS_RDONLY bit and get write access to /proc/self/exe (even with user namespaces this could've been an issue because it's not clear if the flags are locked). However, copying a binary does seem to have a minor performance impact. The only way to have no performance impact would be for the kernel to block these write attempts, but barring that we could try to reduce the overhead by coming up with a mount that cannot have it's read-only bits cleared. The "simplest" solution is to create a temporary overlayfs using fsopen(2) which uses the directory where runc exists as a lowerdir, ensuring that the container cannot access the underlying file -- and we don't have to do any copies. While fsopen(2) is not free because mount namespace cloning is usually expensive (and so it seems like the difference would be marginal), some basic performance testing seems to indicate there is a ~60% improvement doing it this way and that it has effectively no overhead even when compared to just using /proc/self/exe directly: % hyperfine --warmup 50 \ > "./runc-noclone run -b bundle ctr" \ > "./runc-overlayfs run -b bundle ctr" \ > "./runc-memfd run -b bundle ctr" Benchmark 1: ./runc-noclone run -b bundle ctr Time (mean ± σ): 13.7 ms ± 0.9 ms [User: 6.0 ms, System: 10.9 ms] Range (min … max): 11.3 ms … 16.1 ms 184 runs Benchmark 2: ./runc-overlayfs run -b bundle ctr Time (mean ± σ): 13.9 ms ± 0.9 ms [User: 6.2 ms, System: 10.8 ms] Range (min … max): 11.8 ms … 16.0 ms 180 runs Benchmark 3: ./runc-memfd run -b bundle ctr Time (mean ± σ): 22.6 ms ± 1.3 ms [User: 5.7 ms, System: 20.7 ms] Range (min … max): 19.9 ms … 26.5 ms 114 runs Summary ./runc-noclone run -b bundle ctr ran 1.01 ± 0.09 times faster than ./runc-overlayfs run -b bundle ctr 1.65 ± 0.15 times faster than ./runc-memfd run -b bundle ctr Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information
Showing
5 changed files
with
194 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ | ||
| package dmz | ||
|
|
||
| import ( | ||
| "fmt" | ||
| "os" | ||
| "path/filepath" | ||
| "runtime" | ||
| "strings" | ||
|
|
||
| "golang.org/x/sys/unix" | ||
|
|
||
| "github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/utils" | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| func fsopen(fsName string, flags int) (*os.File, error) { | ||
| // Make sure we always set O_CLOEXEC. | ||
| flags |= unix.FSOPEN_CLOEXEC | ||
| fd, err := unix.Fsopen(fsName, flags) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, os.NewSyscallError("fsopen "+fsName, err) | ||
| } | ||
| return os.NewFile(uintptr(fd), "fscontext:"+fsName), nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func fsmount(ctx *os.File, flags, mountAttrs int) (*os.File, error) { | ||
| // Make sure we always set O_CLOEXEC. | ||
| flags |= unix.FSMOUNT_CLOEXEC | ||
| fd, err := unix.Fsmount(int(ctx.Fd()), flags, mountAttrs) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, os.NewSyscallError("fsmount "+ctx.Name(), err) | ||
| } | ||
| runtime.KeepAlive(ctx) // make sure fd is kept alive while it's used | ||
| return os.NewFile(uintptr(fd), "fsmount:"+ctx.Name()), nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func escapeOverlayLowerDir(path string) string { | ||
| // If the lowerdir path contains ":" we need to escape them, and if there | ||
| // were any escape characters already (\) we need to escape those first. | ||
| return strings.ReplaceAll(strings.ReplaceAll(path, `\`, `\\`), `:`, `\:`) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // sealedOverlayfs will create an internal overlayfs mount using fsopen() that | ||
| // uses the directory containing the binary as a lowerdir and a temporary tmpfs | ||
| // as an upperdir. There is no way to "unwrap" this (unlike MS_BIND+MS_RDONLY) | ||
| // and so we can create a safe zero-copy sealed version of /proc/self/exe. | ||
| // This only works for privileged users and on kernels with overlayfs and | ||
| // fsopen() enabled. | ||
| // | ||
| // TODO: Since Linux 5.11, overlayfs can be created inside user namespaces so | ||
| // it is technically possible to create an overlayfs even for rootless | ||
| // containers. Unfortunately, this would require some ugly manual CGo+fork | ||
| // magic so we can do this later if we feel it's really needed. | ||
| func sealedOverlayfs(binPath, tmpDir string) (_ *os.File, Err error) { | ||
| // Try to do the superblock creation first to bail out early if we can't | ||
| // use this method. | ||
| overlayCtx, err := fsopen("overlay", unix.FSOPEN_CLOEXEC) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| defer overlayCtx.Close() | ||
|
|
||
| // binPath is going to be /proc/self/exe, so do a readlink to get the real | ||
| // path. overlayfs needs the real underlying directory for this protection | ||
| // mode to work properly. | ||
| if realPath, err := os.Readlink(binPath); err == nil { | ||
| binPath = realPath | ||
| } | ||
| binLowerDirPath, binName := filepath.Split(binPath) | ||
| // Escape any ":"s or "\"s in the path. | ||
| binLowerDirPath = escapeOverlayLowerDir(binLowerDirPath) | ||
|
|
||
| // Overlayfs requires two lowerdirs in order to run in "lower-only" mode, | ||
| // where writes are completely blocked. Ideally we would create a dummy | ||
| // tmpfs for this, but it turns out that overlayfs doesn't allow for | ||
| // anonymous mountns paths. | ||
| // NOTE: I'm working on a patch to fix this but it won't be backported. | ||
| dummyLowerDirPath := escapeOverlayLowerDir(tmpDir) | ||
|
|
||
| // Configure the lowerdirs. The binary lowerdir needs to be on the top to | ||
| // ensure that a file called "runc" (binName) in the dummy lowerdir doesn't | ||
| // mask the binary. | ||
| lowerDirStr := binLowerDirPath + ":" + dummyLowerDirPath | ||
| if err := unix.FsconfigSetString(int(overlayCtx.Fd()), "lowerdir", lowerDirStr); err != nil { | ||
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("fsconfig set overlayfs lowerdir=%s: %w", lowerDirStr, err) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Get an actual handle to the overlayfs. | ||
| if err := unix.FsconfigCreate(int(overlayCtx.Fd())); err != nil { | ||
| return nil, os.NewSyscallError("fsconfig create overlayfs", err) | ||
| } | ||
| overlayFd, err := fsmount(overlayCtx, unix.FSMOUNT_CLOEXEC, unix.MS_RDONLY|unix.MS_NODEV|unix.MS_NOSUID) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| defer overlayFd.Close() | ||
|
|
||
| // Grab a handle to the binary through overlayfs. | ||
| exeFile, err := utils.Openat(overlayFd, binName, unix.O_PATH|unix.O_NOFOLLOW|unix.O_CLOEXEC, 0) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("open %s from overlayfs (lowerdir=%s): %w", binName, lowerDirStr, err) | ||
| } | ||
| // NOTE: We would like to check that exeFile is the same as /proc/self/exe, | ||
| // except this is a little difficult. Depending on what filesystems the | ||
| // layers are on, overlayfs can remap the inode numbers (and it always | ||
| // creates its own device numbers -- see ovl_map_dev_ino) so we can't do a | ||
| // basic stat-based check. The only reasonable option would be to hash both | ||
| // files and compare them, but this would require fully reading both files | ||
| // which would produce a similar performance overhead to memfd cloning. | ||
| // | ||
| // Ultimately, there isn't a real attack to be worried about here. An | ||
| // attacker would need to be able to modify files in /usr/sbin (or wherever | ||
| // runc lives), at which point they could just replace the runc binary with | ||
| // something malicious anyway. | ||
| return exeFile, nil | ||
| } |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters