Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MT-Broker: return retriable status code based on the state to leverage retries #8366

Conversation

pierDipi
Copy link
Member

@pierDipi pierDipi commented Dec 3, 2024

The ingress or filter deployments were returning 400 even in the case where a given resource (like trigger, broker, subscription) wasn't found, however, this is a common case where the lister cache hasn't caught up with the latest state.

Fixes #

Proposed Changes

  • MT-Broker: return appropriate status code based on the state to leverage retries

Pre-review Checklist

  • At least 80% unit test coverage
  • E2E tests for any new behavior
  • Docs PR for any user-facing impact
  • Spec PR for any new API feature
  • Conformance test for any change to the spec

Release Note

MT-Broker: return retriable status code based on the state to leverage retries

Docs

…age retries

The ingress or filter deployments were returning 400 even in the case
where a given resource (like trigger, broker, subscription) wasn't
found, however, this is a common case where the lister cache
hasn't caught up with the latest state.

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <[email protected]>
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 3, 2024
@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested review from aliok and Cali0707 December 3, 2024 10:59
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 3, 2024
Comment on lines -187 to -189
subscription, err := h.getSubscription(features, trigger)
if err != nil {
h.logger.Info("Unable to get the Subscription of the Trigger", zap.Error(err), zap.Any("triggerRef", triggerRef))
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

moved behind authn feature flag as this is only needed for that

@pierDipi
Copy link
Member Author

pierDipi commented Dec 3, 2024

/cherry-pick release-1.16

@pierDipi
Copy link
Member Author

pierDipi commented Dec 3, 2024

/cherry-pick release-1.15

@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pierDipi: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.16 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pierDipi: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.15 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@pierDipi
Copy link
Member Author

pierDipi commented Dec 3, 2024

/cc @matzew @creydr

@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested review from creydr and matzew December 3, 2024 11:02
Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 17.14286% with 29 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 64.19%. Comparing base (795e4a3) to head (0530607).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/broker/filter/filter_handler.go 17.24% 24 Missing ⚠️
pkg/broker/ingress/ingress_handler.go 16.66% 4 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8366      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   64.27%   64.19%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         389      389              
  Lines       23276    23304      +28     
==========================================
  Hits        14961    14961              
- Misses       7521     7549      +28     
  Partials      794      794              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

writer.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest)
if apierrors.IsNotFound(err) {
h.logger.Info("Unable to find the Trigger", zap.Error(err), zap.Any("triggerRef", triggerRef))
writer.WriteHeader(http.StatusNotFound)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@@ -315,7 +321,7 @@ func (h *Handler) receive(ctx context.Context, headers http.Header, event *cloud
channelAddress, err := h.getChannelAddress(brokerObj)
if err != nil {
h.Logger.Warn("could not get channel address from broker", zap.Error(err))
return http.StatusBadRequest, kncloudevents.NoDuration
return http.StatusInternalServerError, kncloudevents.NoDuration
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Copy link
Member

@matzew matzew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 3, 2024
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Dec 3, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: matzew, pierDipi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow knative-prow bot merged commit d4357e3 into knative:main Dec 3, 2024
34 of 36 checks passed
@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pierDipi: new pull request created: #8367

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pierDipi: #8366 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.15":

Applying: MT-Broker: return appropriate status code based on the state to leverage retries
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	pkg/broker/filter/filter_handler.go
M	pkg/broker/ingress/ingress_handler.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging pkg/broker/ingress/ingress_handler.go
Auto-merging pkg/broker/filter/filter_handler.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in pkg/broker/filter/filter_handler.go
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 MT-Broker: return appropriate status code based on the state to leverage retries

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

pierDipi added a commit to pierDipi/eventing that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
…e retries (knative#8366)

* MT-Broker: return appropriate status code based on the state to leverage retries

The ingress or filter deployments were returning 400 even in the case
where a given resource (like trigger, broker, subscription) wasn't
found, however, this is a common case where the lister cache
hasn't caught up with the latest state.

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <[email protected]>

* Fix unit tests

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <[email protected]>
pierDipi added a commit to pierDipi/eventing that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
…e retries (knative#8366)

* MT-Broker: return appropriate status code based on the state to leverage retries

The ingress or filter deployments were returning 400 even in the case
where a given resource (like trigger, broker, subscription) wasn't
found, however, this is a common case where the lister cache
hasn't caught up with the latest state.

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <[email protected]>

* Fix unit tests

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <[email protected]>
openshift-merge-bot bot pushed a commit to openshift-knative/eventing that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
…e retries (knative#8366) (#972)

* MT-Broker: return appropriate status code based on the state to leverage retries

The ingress or filter deployments were returning 400 even in the case
where a given resource (like trigger, broker, subscription) wasn't
found, however, this is a common case where the lister cache
hasn't caught up with the latest state.



* Fix unit tests



---------

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants