-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 601
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename in-memory-channel ClusterChannelProvisioner #676
Comments
I think there was a concern that the rename would cause breakage for
existing users. This might be a good chance to look at what a graceful
switchover might look like:
1. Create two CCPs: in-memory and in-memory-channel
2. Manage both in-memory and in-memory-channel for the 0.3 release. Publish
a release note that users should change the name of their Channels.
3. Remove the in-memory-channel in 0.4.
See also the discussion in knative/serving#2639
…On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:06 PM Scott Andrews ***@***.***> wrote:
The resource name in-memory-channel is redundant with the resource type
ClusterChannelProvisioner. A more streamlined name would be in-memory or
perhaps memory. The current name was picked back when sources also used
the ClusterProvisioner model.
Additional Info
This is a good candidate for a first time contribution if we agree it's
worth doing.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#676>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHlyN1-iNpB4DTX_UurLKNcyaqgPjl6mks5u2F-CgaJpZM4ZFjTx>
.
--
Evan Anderson <[email protected]>
|
@evankanderson @grantr so should it be done? I could probably take care of it if it is still a go. |
IMO yes. Would be great to have this in for 0.3. |
@evankanderson @grantr @Harwayne After looking at the code, I think there is no need to have two copies of CCPs. The only thing needed for backward compatibility is to preserve the configmap name |
/assign @sbezverk |
/milestone clear |
/milestone v0.4.0 |
/close |
@Harwayne: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Co-authored-by: serverless-qe <[email protected]>
The resource name
in-memory-channel
is redundant with the resource type ClusterChannelProvisioner. A more streamlined name would bein-memory
or perhapsmemory
. The current name was picked back when sources also used the ClusterProvisioner model.Additional Info
This is a good candidate for a first time contribution if we agree it's worth doing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: