Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename in-memory-channel ClusterChannelProvisioner #676

Closed
scothis opened this issue Dec 6, 2018 · 9 comments
Closed

Rename in-memory-channel ClusterChannelProvisioner #676

scothis opened this issue Dec 6, 2018 · 9 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@scothis
Copy link
Contributor

scothis commented Dec 6, 2018

The resource name in-memory-channel is redundant with the resource type ClusterChannelProvisioner. A more streamlined name would be in-memory or perhaps memory. The current name was picked back when sources also used the ClusterProvisioner model.

Additional Info

This is a good candidate for a first time contribution if we agree it's worth doing.

@evankanderson
Copy link
Member

evankanderson commented Dec 6, 2018 via email

@sbezverk
Copy link
Contributor

sbezverk commented Jan 4, 2019

@evankanderson @grantr so should it be done? I could probably take care of it if it is still a go.

@grantr
Copy link
Contributor

grantr commented Jan 4, 2019

IMO yes. Would be great to have this in for 0.3.
/milestone v0.3.0

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added this to the v0.3.0 milestone Jan 4, 2019
@sbezverk
Copy link
Contributor

sbezverk commented Jan 4, 2019

@evankanderson @grantr @Harwayne After looking at the code, I think there is no need to have two copies of CCPs. The only thing needed for backward compatibility is to preserve the configmap name in-memory-channel-dispatcher-config-map In this case channels info can be written and read by old and new renamed CCP. Please let me know if my understanding is not correct.

@sbezverk
Copy link
Contributor

sbezverk commented Jan 5, 2019

/assign @sbezverk

@grantr
Copy link
Contributor

grantr commented Jan 8, 2019

/milestone clear
Removing this from 0.3. See #700 (comment) and followups.

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed this from the v0.3.0 milestone Jan 8, 2019
@grantr
Copy link
Contributor

grantr commented Jan 8, 2019

/milestone v0.4.0

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 8, 2019
@Harwayne
Copy link
Contributor

Harwayne commented Feb 7, 2019

in-memory was created in #708. in-memory-channel is being kept for backwards compatibility for one release and should be removed in 0.5.0.

/close

@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Harwayne: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

in-memory was created in #708. in-memory-channel is being kept for backwards compatibility for one release and should be removed in 0.5.0.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

creydr pushed a commit to creydr/knative-eventing that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants