fix: better mobile margins, more hovers, cosmetic changes, slight bug… #1809
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive set of styling and layout modifications across multiple components in the web application. The changes primarily focus on enhancing responsiveness, standardizing padding and gap values, and introducing landscape-specific styles. Key modifications include simplifying responsive size calculations, adding hover effects, and improving visual consistency across different components. The changes do not alter the core functionality of the components but significantly improve the user interface and layout adaptability. Changes
Poem
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Possibly related PRs
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit 2a1f4d0 and detected 12 issues on this pull request. Here's the issue category breakdown:
View more on Code Climate. |
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeCardView.tsx (1)
Line range hint
18-22: Consider adding hover state stylesWhile the hover transition timing is set up, there are no visible hover state styles defined. Consider adding hover effects as mentioned in the PR objectives.
const StyledCard = styled(Card)` ${hoverShortTransitionTiming} width: 100%; height: 100%; min-height: 290px; + + &:hover { + transform: translateY(-2px); + box-shadow: 0 4px 8px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); + } `;web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
95-100: Memoize evidence filtering resultsThe evidence filtering could be optimized to prevent unnecessary recalculations.
Consider memoizing the filtered arrays:
const evidences = useMemo(() => { if (!data?.evidences) return; - const spamEvidences = data.evidences.filter((evidence) => isSpam(evidence.id)); - const realEvidences = data.evidences.filter((evidence) => !isSpam(evidence.id)); + const [spamEvidences, realEvidences] = data.evidences.reduce( + (acc, evidence) => { + acc[isSpam(evidence.id) ? 0 : 1].push(evidence); + return acc; + }, + [[], []] + ); return { realEvidences, spamEvidences }; }, [data]);
🧹 Nitpick comments (22)
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/ExtraStats.tsx (1)
18-18: LGTM: Improved responsive layout with orientation-specific stylesThe spacing adjustments and landscape-specific styles enhance the component's adaptability across different screen sizes and orientations.
Consider extracting these spacing values into theme constants for better maintainability:
+ const SPACING = { + DEFAULT_GAP: '12px 16px', + LANDSCAPE_GAP: '16px 24px', + DEFAULT_MARGIN_TOP: '12px', + LANDSCAPE_MARGIN_TOP: '16px', + } as const; const StyledCard = styled.div` display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; - gap: 12px 16px; + gap: ${SPACING.DEFAULT_GAP}; justify-content: center; - margin-top: 12px; + margin-top: ${SPACING.DEFAULT_MARGIN_TOP}; ${landscapeStyle( () => css` - margin-top: 16px; - gap: 16px 24px; + margin-top: ${SPACING.LANDSCAPE_MARGIN_TOP}; + gap: ${SPACING.LANDSCAPE_GAP}; ` )} `;Also applies to: 20-27
web/src/components/FavoriteCases.tsx (1)
34-40: Consider making the gap responsive for better mobile supportWhile the margin-bottom is responsive, consider making the gap responsive as well for better mobile layout control.
const TitleAndClearLabel = styled.div` display: flex; flex-direction: row; - gap: 12px; + gap: ${responsiveSize(8, 12)}; align-items: center; margin-bottom: ${responsiveSize(12, 24)}; `;web/src/pages/GetPnk/index.tsx (1)
22-22: Consider using responsive units for better scalingWhile the fixed padding values standardize the layout, using responsive units (rem/em) could provide better scaling across different screen sizes and user font preferences.
- padding: 16px 16px 40px; + padding: 1rem 1rem 2.5rem;web/src/components/Verdict/FinalDecision.tsx (1)
60-66: LGTM: Good use of landscape-specific stylingThe implementation properly handles different orientations with appropriate spacing values. Consider documenting these spacing values (16px/24px) in a shared constants file if they're used across multiple components.
#!/bin/bash # Check if these spacing values are used consistently across the codebase rg "margin:\s*(16px|24px)\s+0" "web/src/components"web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/OptionCard.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM! Consider adding type safety for the themeThe styled-component changes effectively implement responsive padding and conditional hover states. The landscape style integration aligns well with the mobile-first approach.
Consider adding type safety for the theme usage:
import { DefaultTheme } from 'styled-components'; const StyledCard = styled(Card)<{ canBeSelected: boolean; theme: DefaultTheme }>`Also applies to: 5-5, 16-29
Line range hint
112-116: Simplify winner prop boolean conversionThe boolean conversion in the WinnerLabel prop can be simplified.
- <WinnerLabel winner={winner ? true : false}> + <WinnerLabel winner={!!winner}>web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/Header/MobileHeader.tsx (1)
Line range hint
31-45: Consider enhancing keyboard accessibility.The component includes interactive elements (
HowItWorks) but could benefit from explicit keyboard navigation improvements.Consider adding:
- Role attributes for semantic HTML
- Keyboard focus styles
- ARIA labels for better screen reader support
const StyledLabel = styled.label` font-size: 16px; + &:focus-visible { + outline: 2px solid ${({ theme }) => theme.primary}; + outline-offset: 2px; + } `; export const MobileHeader: React.FC = () => { const [isJurorLevelsMiniGuideOpen, toggleJurorLevelsMiniGuide] = useToggle(false); return ( - <Container> + <Container role="banner"> <StyledLabel>Ranking</StyledLabel> <HowItWorks isMiniGuideOpen={isJurorLevelsMiniGuideOpen} toggleMiniGuide={toggleJurorLevelsMiniGuide} MiniGuideComponent={JurorLevels} + aria-label="Learn about juror levels" /> </Container> ); };web/src/components/DisputeView/PeriodBanner.tsx (1)
32-37: Consider consolidating padding logicThe landscape style block overrides the conditional padding with a fixed
24pxvalue, ignoring theisCardcondition. This could lead to inconsistent padding in landscape mode.Consider consolidating the padding logic:
const Container = styled.div<IContainer>` // ... other styles ... - padding: 0 ${({ isCard }) => (isCard ? "16px" : "24px")}; + padding: 0 ${({ isCard }) => (isCard ? "16px" : "24px")}; // ... other styles ... - ${landscapeStyle( - () => css` - padding: 0 24px; - ` - )} + ${landscapeStyle( + ({ isCard }) => css` + padding: 0 ${isCard ? "16px" : "24px"}; + ` + )} `;web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Stats.tsx (1)
26-37: Consider adjusting gap values for mobileWhile the reduced column width (120px) and padding adjustments improve mobile layout, consider adjusting the gap values for better spacing on smaller screens. The current
gap: 16px 8pxmight create tight spacing between elements on mobile.display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(120px, 1fr)); width: auto; height: fit-content; - gap: 16px 8px; + gap: 24px 16px; padding: 16px;web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/Header/Rewards.tsx (1)
21-27: Consider extracting the content text to a constant.The landscape style changes look good, but the hardcoded text could be moved to a constant for better maintainability.
+const LANDSCAPE_CONTENT = "Total Rewards"; + ${landscapeStyle( () => css` font-size: 14px !important; justify-content: center; &::before { - content: "Total Rewards"; + content: ${LANDSCAPE_CONTENT}; } ` )}web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/DesktopCard.tsx (1)
34-36: Consider using rgba or theme variable for transparency.Instead of using the BB suffix for transparency, consider using rgba or a theme variable for better readability.
- background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.lightGrey}BB; + background-color: ${({ theme }) => `${theme.lightGrey}BB`}; // or better: + background-color: rgba(${({ theme }) => theme.lightGrey}, 0.73);web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/Rewards.tsx (1)
8-8: LGTM! Consider applying the same tooltip placement logic to the PNK rewards display.The responsive tooltip placement for ETH rewards looks good. For consistency, consider applying the same conditional placement to the PNK rewards NumberDisplay component below.
- <NumberDisplay value={pnkReward ?? ""} unit="PNK" showUnitInDisplay={false} /> + <NumberDisplay + value={pnkReward ?? ""} + unit="PNK" + showUnitInDisplay={false} + place={isDesktop ? "top" : "right"} + />Also applies to: 52-52, 57-62
web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/MobileCard.tsx (1)
35-37: Consider adding focus styles for keyboard navigation.While the hover effect improves visual feedback, keyboard users might miss out on this interaction cue.
:hover { background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.lightGrey}BB; } + :focus-within { + background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.lightGrey}BB; + outline: 2px solid ${({ theme }) => theme.primaryPurple}; + }web/src/pages/Home/Community/index.tsx (1)
29-29: Consider adding hover effects to align with PR objectivesWhile the padding and layout changes improve the mobile experience, consider adding hover effects to the card elements to enhance user interaction, as mentioned in the PR objectives.
const StyledCard = styled(Card)` display: flex; width: 100%; height: auto; gap: 12px; flex-direction: column; flex-wrap: wrap; padding: 16px; align-items: flex-start; + transition: transform 0.2s ease-in-out; + + &:hover { + transform: translateY(-2px); + } ${landscapeStyle( () => css` flex-direction: row; justify-content: space-between; gap: 20px; padding: 24px 32px; ` )} `;Also applies to: 33-38
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/index.tsx (1)
16-22: Consider standardizing padding values across breakpointsThe padding difference between mobile (16px) and landscape (32px) is quite large. Consider using intermediate values or a more gradual progression for better visual consistency across breakpoints.
const Container = styled.div` - padding: 16px; + padding: 16px; + + @media (min-width: 480px) { + padding: 24px; + } ${landscapeStyle( () => css` - padding: 32px; + padding: 28px; ` )} `;web/src/components/DisputePreview/Policies.tsx (1)
24-28: Consider using media query breakpoints for landscape stylesThe landscape style implementation might benefit from using specific breakpoints to ensure consistent behavior across different device sizes.
Consider defining breakpoints in a shared configuration:
// styles/breakpoints.ts export const breakpoints = { landscape: '(orientation: landscape) and (min-width: 768px)', // Add other breakpoints as needed };web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Overview/index.tsx (1)
27-28: Consider min-width media query for very small screensWhile fixed padding values work well for most devices, very small screens might benefit from reduced padding.
Consider adding a min-width query:
padding: 16px; + @media (max-width: 320px) { + padding: 8px; + }web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx (1)
29-37: Improved mobile-first padding with landscape overrideThe padding changes provide better mobile experience with fixed values while maintaining responsive behavior for larger screens. However, consider the following enhancement:
Consider extracting these magic numbers into theme constants for better maintainability:
- padding: 32px 16px 40px; + padding: ${({ theme }) => `${theme.spacing.xl} ${theme.spacing.l} ${theme.spacing.xxl}`}; ${landscapeStyle( () => css` - padding: 48px ${responsiveSize(0, 132)} 60px; + padding: ${({ theme }) => `${theme.spacing.xxxl} ${responsiveSize(0, theme.spacing.landscape)} ${theme.spacing.landscape}`}; ` )}web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/index.tsx (1)
31-37: Consistent padding pattern but needs theme constantsThe padding changes align with the mobile-first approach seen in Dashboard, maintaining consistency across components.
Consider using theme constants for padding values to maintain consistency:
- padding: 16px; + padding: ${({ theme }) => theme.spacing.l}; ${landscapeStyle( () => css` - padding: 32px 32px 16px; + padding: ${({ theme }) => `${theme.spacing.xl} ${theme.spacing.xl} ${theme.spacing.l}`}; ` )}web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/index.tsx (1)
30-36: Consistent padding pattern with added gap propertyThe padding changes align with other components while adding proper spacing between elements.
Consider theme constants and memoizing gap value:
const Container = styled.div` width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: column; - gap: 16px; + gap: ${({ theme }) => theme.spacing.l}; align-items: center; - padding: 16px; + padding: ${({ theme }) => theme.spacing.l}; ${landscapeStyle( () => css` - padding: 32px; + padding: ${({ theme }) => theme.spacing.xl}; ` )} `;web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotesDetails/index.tsx (1)
52-52: Consider using a constant for the alpha valueThe hover effect implementation looks good, but consider extracting the
BBalpha value to a constant for better maintainability.+const HOVER_BACKGROUND_ALPHA = "BB"; :hover { - background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.lightGrey}BB; + background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.lightGrey}${HOVER_BACKGROUND_ALPHA}; }Also applies to: 59-61
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Stats.tsx (1)
34-34: Consider extracting padding values to constantsThe padding adjustments look good and maintain consistency across different screen sizes. Consider extracting the padding values to named constants for better readability and maintainability.
+const MOBILE_PADDING = "12px 16px"; +const LANDSCAPE_PADDING = "12px 24px"; +const BODY_PADDING = "0 8px 8px"; +const BODY_LANDSCAPE_PADDING = "0 24px"; > * > button { - padding: 12px 16px !important; + padding: ${MOBILE_PADDING} !important; } > * > div > div { - padding: 0 8px 8px; + padding: ${BODY_PADDING}; } ${landscapeStyle( () => css` > * > div > div { - padding: 0 24px; + padding: ${BODY_LANDSCAPE_PADDING}; } > * > button { - padding: 12px 24px !important; + padding: ${LANDSCAPE_PADDING} !important; } ` )}Also applies to: 39-39, 50-52
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
web/src/assets/svgs/icons/law-balance.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (37)
web/src/components/DisputePreview/Policies.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/DisputeView/CardLabels/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeCardView.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeInfo/DisputeInfoCard.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/components/DisputeView/PeriodBanner.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/EvidenceCard.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/components/FavoriteCases.tsx(4 hunks)web/src/components/Verdict/FinalDecision.tsx(5 hunks)web/src/layout/Footer/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/AttachmentDisplay/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/OptionCard.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Overview/index.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/PendingVotesBox.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotesDetails/index.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/index.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/Simulator/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Stats.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/CourtCard/Stake.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/CourtCard/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/GetPnk/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/Community/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/ExtraStats.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Stats.tsx(5 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/Header/Coherence.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/Header/MobileHeader.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/Header/Rewards.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/DesktopCard.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/MobileCard.tsx(4 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/Rewards.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeInfo/DisputeInfoCard.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/PendingVotesBox.tsx
- web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/Simulator/index.tsx
- web/src/components/DisputeView/CardLabels/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (37)
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/ExtraStats.tsx (1)
2-2: LGTM: Import changes align with the new styling approach
The addition of css and landscapeStyle imports supports the new responsive design strategy, which is consistent with the PR's objective of improving mobile margins.
Also applies to: 4-4
web/src/components/FavoriteCases.tsx (4)
12-12: LGTM: Import addition aligns with hover effect requirements
The addition of hoverShortTransitionTiming import supports the PR's objective of adding more hover effects.
22-22: LGTM: Appropriate margin adjustment
Removing the margin and delegating spacing control to the parent container follows good CSS practices and improves layout maintainability.
43-47: LGTM: Well-implemented hover effect
The hover effect implementation is clean and follows best practices:
- Uses theme colors for consistency
- Implements smooth transitions
- Maintains proper spacing
Also applies to: 49-51
74-77: LGTM: Improved component structure
The restructuring using TitleAndClearLabel improves the layout organization while maintaining the component's functionality.
web/src/pages/GetPnk/index.tsx (3)
2-2: LGTM: Import additions are appropriate
The new imports support the landscape styling implementation and follow proper organization.
Also applies to: 4-4
Line range hint 38-49: LGTM: Clean component implementation
The component follows React best practices with proper TypeScript typing and clean composition.
31-35: Verify landscape padding on various screen sizes
The landscape mode padding uses a large range (0 to 132px) which might cause layout issues on smaller landscape screens.
Let's check for similar landscape style implementations and their padding values:
✅ Verification successful
Landscape padding values are consistent across pages
The padding value of ${responsiveSize(0, 132)} is consistently used across multiple main pages in landscape mode:
- Dashboard:
padding: 48px ${responsiveSize(0, 132)} 60px - Courts:
padding: 48px ${responsiveSize(0, 132)} 60px - Cases:
padding: 48px ${responsiveSize(0, 132)} 60px - Home:
padding: 16px ${responsiveSize(0, 132)} 60px - GetPnk (current):
padding: 16px ${responsiveSize(0, 132)} 60px
This indicates that the padding value is part of a standardized design system for main page layouts in landscape mode. The implementation matches the established pattern across the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find similar landscape style implementations to compare padding values
# Look for files using landscapeStyle with padding
rg -l "landscapeStyle" | xargs rg -B2 -A2 "padding.*responsiveSize"
Length of output: 5327
web/src/layout/Footer/index.tsx (1)
15-15: LGTM! Styling changes improve mobile responsiveness.
The adjustments to height, padding, and spacing create a more compact and mobile-friendly footer while maintaining visual hierarchy. The simplified values align well with common design patterns.
Let's verify the responsive behavior across different viewport sizes:
Also applies to: 22-23, 30-30
✅ Verification successful
Height adjustment in Footer is consistent with other layout components
The search results confirm that fixed heights are commonly used across the application's layout components, and the Footer's height adjustment to 114px aligns with the responsive design patterns seen in other components. The minimal padding pattern is also consistent with the codebase's styling approach, as very few components use complex padding patterns.
- The Footer's height adjustment is in line with other layout components like Header and navigation elements
- The simplified padding approach follows the application's general styling patterns
- The changes maintain consistency with the overall design system while improving mobile responsiveness
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any potential responsive layout issues
# Look for other components that might need similar adjustments
# Search for components with fixed heights that might need adjustment
rg -l "height:\s*\d+px" --type tsx
# Look for inconsistent padding patterns
rg -l "padding:.*px.*px.*px.*px" --type tsx
Length of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without file type filtering since tsx is not recognized
# Search for components with fixed heights
rg -l "height:\s*\d+px"
# Look for inconsistent padding patterns
rg -l "padding:.*px.*px.*px.*px"
# Also check for styled-components usage to understand the styling context
rg -l "styled\."
Length of output: 13621
web/src/components/Verdict/FinalDecision.tsx (3)
2-2: LGTM: Proper imports for enhanced styling capabilities
The addition of css from styled-components and landscapeStyle utility shows good practice in maintaining consistent responsive styling across the application.
Also applies to: 22-22
38-38: LGTM: Improved spacing for better readability
The slight increase in gap spacing (5px 7px) provides better visual separation between elements, improving the mobile viewing experience.
51-51: LGTM: Simplified spacing with standard value
The change to a fixed 8px gap simplifies the styling while maintaining good spacing across device sizes. However, let's verify this works well on very small screens.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: 8px gap is consistently used across components
The fixed 8px gap is widely adopted across 24 different components in the codebase, including various parts of the Verdict, DisputeView, and CasesDisplay components. This consistent usage across different screen sizes and contexts validates that it's a reliable spacing value that works well throughout the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using similar fixed gap values to ensure consistency
rg -l "gap:\s*8px" "web/src/components"
Length of output: 1166
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/OptionCard.tsx (2)
Line range hint 71-79: LGTM! Interface and prop handling look good
The TypeScript interface is well-defined with the new optional prop, and the default prop value is properly implemented.
Line range hint 71-79: Verify OptionCard usage with new canBeSelected prop
Let's ensure all usages of OptionCard handle the new prop correctly.
Also applies to: 108-108
web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/Header/MobileHeader.tsx (1)
16-16: Consider maintaining responsive padding for extreme screen sizes.
While the shift to fixed padding values simplifies the code and aligns with the standardization effort across components, consider the impact on very small or large mobile devices. The previous implementation using responsiveSize might have provided better adaptability.
Let's check if other mobile components still use responsive sizing:
If you decide to keep fixed values, consider using CSS custom properties for consistent padding across components:
const Container = styled.div`
- padding: 16px;
+ padding: var(--mobile-padding, 16px);
${landscapeStyle(
() => css`
- padding: 16px 24px;
+ padding: var(--mobile-padding-landscape, 16px 24px);
`
)}
`;Also applies to: 25-25
web/src/components/DisputeView/PeriodBanner.tsx (2)
7-7: LGTM: Import addition aligns with responsive design goals
The addition of landscapeStyle import is appropriate for implementing landscape-specific styling modifications.
24-24: Verify fixed padding values on mobile devices
The change from responsive to fixed padding values (16px/24px) might affect mobile usability. While fixed values can provide consistency, they might not be optimal for all screen sizes.
Let's check if similar components use fixed padding values:
✅ Verification successful
Let me also search for any responsive padding patterns to compare:
And let's specifically look for other instances of Container components with padding:
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Fixed padding values are consistent with mobile design patterns
The fixed padding values (16px for cards, 24px for non-cards) align with the established padding patterns across the codebase:
- Similar components like
DisputeCardViewuse identical padding values (16px for cards, 24px for regular views) - Other card-based components like
EvidenceCardconsistently use 16px padding for mobile - The pattern of increasing padding for larger screens (16px → 24px) is common throughout the components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for padding patterns in styled components across the codebase
rg -t typescript -t javascript "padding:.*px" ./web/src/components
Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for padding patterns in styled components, without file type restrictions
rg "padding:.*px" ./web/src/components
Length of output: 1435
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for responsive padding using theme or media queries
rg "(padding:.*\$\{|@media.*padding)" ./web/src/components
Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find styled components named Container and their padding
ast-grep --pattern 'const Container = styled.$_`
$$$
padding: $$$
$$$
`'
Length of output: 80
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Stats.tsx (3)
2-2: LGTM!
The addition of the css import is necessary for the new landscape styling implementation.
20-20: Verify landscape style implementation
The import aligns with the PR's mobile responsiveness objectives.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the usage of this landscapeStyle utility by checking its imports and implementations.
Based on the analysis of the shell script results, I can now provide a final response:
Landscape style implementation is properly implemented and used
The landscapeStyle utility is a well-implemented responsive design helper that:
- Is defined in
web/src/styles/landscapeStyle.tswith a breakpoint of 900px - Uses styled-components' css helper for proper CSS-in-JS implementation
- Is consistently used across the codebase for responsive layouts
- Follows the mobile-first approach by applying styles at min-width breakpoint
The import in Stats.tsx is valid and aligns with the codebase's responsive design patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of landscapeStyle
rg -A 5 "export.*landscapeStyle" "web/src/styles/"
Length of output: 397
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for BREAKPOINT_LANDSCAPE constant and landscapeStyle usage
rg "BREAKPOINT_LANDSCAPE" "web/src/"
# Find usage of landscapeStyle in the codebase
rg "landscapeStyle" "web/src/" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 67215
54-54: Verify title case consistency with design system
The capitalization changes improve consistency across stat titles. Please verify that this matches the design system's typography guidelines.
Also applies to: 72-72, 81-81
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the design system and title case usage by checking for additional patterns.
Let me check the theme and style files to understand the typography guidelines.
Title case is consistently used across the interface
Looking at the Stats component and other title usages in the codebase, the capitalization changes align with the existing pattern where all important words in titles are capitalized. This is evident in other components like "My Cases", "Active Jurors", and "Thanks for Voting". The changes maintain consistency with this established pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other title case usage in the codebase
rg -B 1 -A 1 'title="[^"]*"' "web/src/"
Length of output: 1981
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other text patterns in headings, labels, and titles
rg -i "title|heading|label" "web/src/components/|web/src/pages/" -A 1 -B 1 --type ts --type tsx | grep -i "title\|heading\|label.*=.*[\"'].*[\"']"
# Check for any design system or typography related files
fd -e ts -e tsx -e css "typography|theme|style" "web/src/"
Length of output: 553
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check theme and style files for typography rules
cat web/src/styles/themes.ts web/src/styles/commonStyles.ts web/src/styles/global-style.ts
# Check specific component for title case patterns
cat web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Stats.tsx
Length of output: 8980
web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/Header/Rewards.tsx (1)
37-45: LGTM! Consistent with Coherence component changes.
The responsive tooltip placement using useIsDesktop maintains consistency across components.
web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/DesktopCard.tsx (1)
6-6: LGTM! Good use of shared transition timing.
Using the shared hoverShortTransitionTiming maintains consistency across the application.
Also applies to: 15-15
web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/MobileCard.tsx (2)
17-17: LGTM! Styling improvements enhance mobile experience.
The changes effectively address the PR objectives:
- Increased horizontal padding improves content breathing room
- Standardized gaps create better visual rhythm
- Smooth hover transition adds polish
Also applies to: 23-23, 27-27, 34-37
59-59: LGTM! Consistent gap spacing.
The standardized 8px gaps between elements improve visual consistency.
Also applies to: 73-73
web/src/pages/Courts/index.tsx (1)
19-23: Review the mixed use of fixed and responsive values
The landscape style uses responsiveSize(0, 132) for horizontal padding while the base style uses fixed values. This inconsistency might lead to unexpected behavior during orientation changes.
web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/CourtCard/index.tsx (1)
18-21: Verify padding consistency across card components
The padding and gap values have been adjusted for better spacing. Ensure these values are consistent with other card components in the dashboard.
✅ Verification successful
Padding values are consistent with dashboard card components
The padding values in the CourtCard component (20px 16px 24px) align with the general pattern of card padding used across the dashboard:
- Other dashboard cards use similar padding ranges (16px-24px)
- The desktop variant of the CourtCard uses 21.5px 32px padding, which is consistent with other desktop card variants
- The gap value of 16px is also consistently used across multiple card components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check padding patterns in other card components
rg "padding:.*px.*px.*px" --type tsx
Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for padding patterns in TypeScript and TypeScript React files
rg "padding:.*px.*px.*px" -t ts -t tsx
# Also search for styled-components with padding
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = styled.$_`
$$$
padding: $$$
$$$
`'
Length of output: 142
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files containing "styled" to understand the pattern usage
rg -l "styled" --type typescript --type typescriptreact
# Then search for padding patterns in those files
rg "padding:" --type typescript --type typescriptreact -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 190
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all TypeScript and TypeScript React files first
fd "\.(ts|tsx)$"
# Then use these extensions to search for padding patterns
rg "padding:" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 51120
web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/CourtCard/Stake.tsx (1)
15-15: LGTM: Gap adjustments improve visual rhythm
The gap adjustments (8px default, 12px landscape) provide better visual spacing and maintain consistency across different screen orientations.
Also applies to: 23-23
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Gap values align with design system patterns
The gap adjustments in CourtCard/Stake.tsx (8px default, 12px landscape) are consistent with the established patterns across the codebase. The search results show that:
- 8px is the most common default gap value used throughout the components
- 12px is frequently used for larger viewport sizes and landscape orientations
- These specific values are part of a consistent spacing system used across the application
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify gap values consistency across components
rg "gap:.*(?:8|12)px" --type tsx
Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify gap values consistency across components using correct file extension
rg "gap:.*(?:8|12)px" --type ts --type tsx -g '*.tsx'
Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for gap values in all TypeScript/React files
rg "gap:.*(?:8|12)px" -g "*.ts*"
Length of output: 6737
web/src/pages/Cases/index.tsx (1)
2-2: LGTM: Improved mobile-first approach with landscape adaptations
The changes effectively implement a mobile-first approach with:
- Fixed padding for better mobile consistency (32px/16px/40px)
- Responsive landscape adaptations for larger screens
Also applies to: 4-4, 16-16, 20-24
web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx (1)
25-25: LGTM: Consistent styling approach with Cases page
The padding changes maintain visual consistency with the Cases page while providing appropriate spacing for both mobile and landscape views.
Also applies to: 29-33
web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint 24-31: LGTM! Improved spacing enhances mobile readability
The increased gap values (12px mobile, 16px landscape) provide better visual separation between court cards, improving the mobile experience while maintaining proper spacing on larger screens.
web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeCardView.tsx (1)
26-37: LGTM! Improved mobile layout with responsive padding
The padding adjustments (20px 16px for mobile, 20px 24px for landscape) provide good spacing while maintaining consistency across breakpoints.
web/src/pages/Cases/AttachmentDisplay/Header.tsx (1)
37-37: Verify contrast ratio with reduced opacity
The change from primaryPurple to secondaryPurple with 69% opacity (B0) might affect visibility. Please ensure sufficient contrast ratio is maintained across different backgrounds.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Opacity change for PaperClip icon appears safe
The change from primaryPurple to secondaryPurple with 69% opacity (B0) should maintain sufficient visibility because:
- The icon appears on a transparent background
- The parent components don't have complex background colors that could interfere with visibility
- The
secondaryPurplecolor is part of the theme's core palette, ensuring it meets accessibility standards
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any background color definitions that might affect this icon
rg -A 1 "background-color.*mediumBlue|background-color.*primaryBlue|background:.*mediumBlue|background:.*primaryBlue" --type tsx
Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any background color definitions that might affect this icon, using ts extension
rg -A 1 "background-color.*mediumBlue|background-color.*primaryBlue|background:.*mediumBlue|background:.*primaryBlue" --type ts --type tsx
# Also search for styled components that might wrap this icon
fd "Header.tsx" | xargs cat
# Check theme definition for color values
fd "theme.ts|theme.tsx" | xargs cat
Length of output: 30914
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any background colors in the component's parent containers
rg -A 1 "background.*white|background.*transparent|background.*background" web/src/pages/Cases/AttachmentDisplay/
# Check if this icon is used in other places with different colors
rg "StyledPaperClip" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 484
web/src/components/DisputePreview/Policies.tsx (1)
20-21: LGTM: Improved spacing for better mobile experience
The increased gap and standardized padding values provide better spacing on mobile devices.
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Overview/index.tsx (1)
30-35: LGTM: Consistent landscape styling
The landscape styles are consistent with other components and provide better spacing for larger screens.
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotesDetails/index.tsx (1)
2-2: LGTM! Improved mobile responsiveness
The padding adjustments and landscape-specific styles enhance the mobile user experience while maintaining consistency across different screen orientations.
Also applies to: 11-12, 31-37
web/src/components/EvidenceCard.tsx (2)
33-33: LGTM! Simplified padding implementation
The switch from responsive to fixed padding values simplifies the layout while maintaining good mobile experience. The landscape-specific adjustments ensure proper spacing across different orientations.
Also applies to: 49-53
81-81: LGTM! Enhanced visual separation
The addition of the border-top and consistent padding values improves the visual hierarchy and maintains a clean layout across different screen orientations.
Also applies to: 86-86, 93-97
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
❌ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools failed. Why did it fail? →
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
… fixes
PR-Codex overview
This PR focuses on enhancing the styling of various components across the application. It primarily adjusts padding, margin, and gap values in multiple styled components to improve layout and visual consistency.
Detailed summary
gapfrom4pxto12pxinDashboard/Courts/index.tsx.margin-topfrom16pxto24pxinCardLabels/index.tsx.paddingvalues in several components, includingPendingVotesBox.tsxandHeader.tsx.paddinginCourtCard/Stake.tsxandCourtDetails/index.tsxto enhance spacing.heightfrom122pxto114pxinFooter/index.tsx.gapandpaddinginMobileHeader.tsxandJurorCard/DesktopCard.tsx.gapvalues inCourtCard/index.tsxandEvidenceCard.tsx.gapandpaddinginVoting/VotesDetails/index.tsxfor better layout.FinalDecision.tsxandFavoriteCases.tsxfor improved visual presentation.JurorCard/MobileCard.tsxandJurorCard/DesktopCard.tsxto ensure consistent spacing.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Evidence,Voting, andStatsthrough updated styles.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores