Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(web): add-utility-to-check-empty-strings-with-whitespaces #1725

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

Harman-singh-waraich
Copy link
Contributor

@Harman-singh-waraich Harman-singh-waraich commented Oct 23, 2024

PR-Codex overview

This PR introduces a new utility function isEmpty to check if a string is empty or contains only whitespace. It replaces instances of direct string checks with isEmpty for improved readability and consistency across various components.

Detailed summary

  • Added isEmpty function in web/src/utils/index.ts.
  • Updated display logic in StyledButton to use isEmpty in PreviousButton.tsx.
  • Modified condition in FormContact.tsx to use isEmpty for contactInput.
  • Changed isDisabled logic in SubmitEvidenceModal.tsx to use isEmpty for message.
  • Used isEmpty in Search.tsx for search checks.
  • Updated policyURI check in NewDisputeContext.tsx to use isEmpty.
  • Refactored alias validation logic in NextButton.tsx to use isEmpty.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new utility function, isEmpty, to enhance string validation across various components.
    • Updated logic in multiple components to use isEmpty for improved checks on empty strings and better control flow.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced validation logic for fields such as policyURI and input fields in forms, ensuring more robust checks.
  • Documentation

    • Updated interface to include an optional aliasesArray in dispute data structure.

These changes improve the overall functionality and user experience when interacting with forms and navigation within the application.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduced in this pull request involve the addition of a new utility function, isEmpty, to the web/src/utils/index.ts file. This function is utilized across several components, including Search, NewDisputeContext, FormContact, SubmitEvidenceModal, NextButton, and PreviousButton, to enhance the logic for checking empty values. The modifications primarily focus on replacing direct string comparisons with the isEmpty function, improving the robustness of conditions related to user input and data validation.

Changes

File Change Summary
web/src/components/CasesDisplay/Search.tsx Added isEmpty utility; updated logic for newFilters to use isEmpty(search) instead of checking for an empty string.
web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx Added isEmpty utility; updated policyURI check to use isEmpty; modified IDisputeData interface to include aliasesArray.
web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Menu/Settings/Notifications/FormContactDetails/FormContact.tsx Added isEmpty utility; updated fieldVariant logic to use isEmpty(contactInput).
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/SubmitEvidenceModal.tsx Added isEmpty utility; updated logic for isDisabled to use isEmpty(message) instead of checking for an empty string.
web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/NextButton.tsx Added isEmpty utility; updated checks for alias.address and alias.name to use isEmpty.
web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/PreviousButton.tsx Added isEmpty utility; updated rendering logic for the button to use isEmpty(prevRoute).
web/src/utils/index.ts Introduced isEmpty function to check if a string is empty or contains only whitespace.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix(web): submit-evidence-button-disable-condition #1722: The changes in the SubmitEvidenceModal.tsx file are related as both PRs modify the logic for determining the disabled state of a button using the isEmpty utility function, affecting the control flow based on the state of a message variable.

Suggested reviewers

  • alcercu
  • kemuru

🐰 "In the code, a new friend was found,
isEmpty helps us all around.
With checks so neat, our logic's bright,
Empty strings now face the light!
From search to submit, we refine,
A cleaner path, oh how divine!" 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6707b93 and a5f344c.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Menu/Settings/Notifications/FormContactDetails/FormContact.tsx (2 hunks)
  • web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/SubmitEvidenceModal.tsx (2 hunks)
  • web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/NextButton.tsx (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Menu/Settings/Notifications/FormContactDetails/FormContact.tsx
  • web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/SubmitEvidenceModal.tsx
  • web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/NextButton.tsx

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a5f344c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-university/deploys/6718cbd263efe600081cf82b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1725--kleros-v2-university.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a5f344c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-testnet/deploys/6718cbd2ab1dbc000899d7eb
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1725--kleros-v2-testnet.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a5f344c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-testnet-devtools/deploys/6718cbd2378412000868172b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1725--kleros-v2-testnet-devtools.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 10

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
web/src/utils/index.ts (1)

4-7: Enhance documentation with more details.

The JSDoc comment could be more descriptive about the function's behavior with whitespace and parameter requirements.

 /**
- * Checks if a string is empty or contains only whitespace.
+ * Checks if a string is empty or contains only whitespace characters.
+ * @param str - The string to check
+ * @returns true if the string is empty or contains only whitespace, false otherwise
+ * @example
+ * isEmpty("") // returns true
+ * isEmpty("  ") // returns true
+ * isEmpty("text") // returns false
  */
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f2e88f and 6707b93.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • web/src/components/CasesDisplay/Search.tsx (2 hunks)
  • web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx (2 hunks)
  • web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Menu/Settings/Notifications/FormContactDetails/FormContact.tsx (2 hunks)
  • web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/SubmitEvidenceModal.tsx (2 hunks)
  • web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/NextButton.tsx (2 hunks)
  • web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/PreviousButton.tsx (1 hunks)
  • web/src/utils/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx

[error] 136-136: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)

🔇 Additional comments (9)
web/src/utils/index.ts (1)

7-7: Consider a more specific function name.

Since the function specifically handles whitespace trimming, a more descriptive name like isEmptyOrWhitespace would better convey its behavior.

-export const isEmpty = (str: string): boolean => str.trim() === "";
+export const isEmptyOrWhitespace = (str: string): boolean => str.trim() === "";

Let's verify the impact of renaming:

web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/PreviousButton.tsx (2)

10-10: LGTM! Good improvement in empty string handling.

The change to use isEmpty utility makes the empty check more robust by handling whitespace characters. This is consistent with the refactoring goal across the codebase.


7-7: Verify the import path resolution.

The import path src/utils appears to be using TypeScript path aliases. Let's verify this is properly configured.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the TypeScript configuration and the utility function usage.


Import path is valid and consistently used across the codebase

The verification shows that:

  • The isEmpty utility is properly defined in web/src/utils/index.ts
  • The import is being used consistently across multiple files in two variations:
    • from "src/utils"
    • from "utils/index"
  • Both import styles are working, indicating proper TypeScript path resolution in the project

The import in PreviousButton.tsx follows the established pattern and is correctly importing a valid utility function.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for TypeScript configuration and path aliases
echo "Checking for tsconfig.json..."
cat tsconfig.json | grep -A 5 "paths"

# Verify the utils module exists
echo -e "\nVerifying utils module..."
fd --type f "index.ts" --exec grep -l "isEmpty" {} \; 

Length of output: 299


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any TypeScript configuration files
echo "Checking for TypeScript config files..."
fd tsconfig

# Check the content of the utils module
echo -e "\nChecking utils module content..."
cat ./web/src/utils/index.ts

# Check for other files using the isEmpty import
echo -e "\nChecking for isEmpty usage..."
rg "import.*isEmpty.*from.*utils" -A 1

Length of output: 1806

web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Menu/Settings/Notifications/FormContactDetails/FormContact.tsx (1)

5-5: LGTM!

The import statement follows standard practices and is appropriately placed with other imports.

web/src/components/CasesDisplay/Search.tsx (2)

10-10: LGTM: Import statement is correctly updated

The addition of the isEmpty utility import is consistent with the changes and is properly utilized in the component.


61-61: Verify handling of whitespace in search filters

The change to use isEmpty will now treat whitespace-only strings as empty. Please verify if this is the intended behavior, especially considering:

  1. URL encoding/decoding of search parameters
  2. User expectations when entering spaces in the search field

Let's verify the implementation of isEmpty utility:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since I found the implementation of isEmpty utility.

Whitespace handling in search filters is implemented correctly

The isEmpty utility (in web/src/utils/index.ts) uses str.trim() to remove leading/trailing whitespace before comparison, which is a standard and user-friendly approach because:

  1. It correctly treats whitespace-only searches as empty, preventing unnecessary API calls
  2. The implementation aligns with common user expectations where typing spaces shouldn't trigger a search
  3. URL encoding/decoding is not affected since trimmed empty strings will be handled consistently
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the implementation of isEmpty utility and its usage
# Expected: The utility should handle whitespace-only strings appropriately

# Check the isEmpty implementation
rg -A 5 "export.*isEmpty.*=" web/src/utils/

# Look for any existing tests
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx | xargs rg "isEmpty"

Length of output: 206

web/src/context/NewDisputeContext.tsx (3)

8-8: LGTM: Import addition aligns with PR objective.

The addition of isEmpty import is consistent with the PR's goal to enhance empty string validation.


136-136: LGTM: Enhanced validation for policyURI.

The addition of isEmpty check improves the robustness of the validation by properly handling whitespace-only strings.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 136-136: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


Line range hint 44-44: Verify the usage of aliasesArray across components.

The addition of aliasesArray to IDisputeData looks good, but let's verify its usage across components to ensure consistent handling.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as I have sufficient information about the usage of aliasesArray across components.

The aliasesArray property is consistently implemented across components

The property is properly used throughout the codebase:

  • In NewDisputeContext.tsx: Correctly defined in interface and initialized with default value
  • In NextButton.tsx: Used for validation of addresses
  • In NotablePersons/index.tsx: Handles array management (add/remove)
  • In PersonFields.tsx: Manages individual alias updates and validation

The implementation shows a clear transformation pattern where aliasesArray is processed into the aliases object format when needed, maintaining consistency with the existing architecture.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for components using aliasesArray to verify consistent implementation
rg -A 5 "aliasesArray" web/src/

Length of output: 6805

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a5f344c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-neo/deploys/6718cbd2dcd5340008920813
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1725--kleros-v2-neo.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Oct 23, 2024
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Code Climate has analyzed commit a5f344c and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@alcercu alcercu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@alcercu alcercu added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 23, 2024
Merged via the queue into dev with commit a932aa6 Oct 23, 2024
27 of 28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants