Removal of unused court DisputeTemplateView, already replaced by the Dev Tools

[jaybuidl]

PR-Codex overview

This PR focuses on removing components and references related to the DisputeTemplateView, cleaning up the codebase by deleting unused files and dependencies, and making some adjustments in the environment scripts.

Detailed summary

• Deleted files:
  • web/src/components/JSONEditor.tsx
  • web/src/pages/DisputeTemplateView/index.tsx
  • web/src/pages/DisputeTemplateView/FetchFromIdInput.tsx
  • web/src/pages/DisputeTemplateView/FetchDisputeRequestInput.tsx
• Removed vanilla-jsoneditor dependency from web/package.json and yarn.lock.
• Updated sourceEnvFile function to use local for envFile variable in web/scripts/runEnv.sh and web-devtools/scripts/runEnv.sh.
• Removed route for DisputeTemplateView in web/src/app.tsx.
• Removed HiddenLink component and related conditional rendering in web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Updated environment handling for improved deployment management.
  • Simplified routing structure by removing the DisputeTemplateView component.

• Bug Fixes

  • Removed unused components related to dispute management, streamlining the application.

• Chores

  • Incremented project version to 0.2.0 and removed unnecessary dependencies.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request includes significant modifications to various scripts and components within the web application. Key changes involve the restructuring of environment handling in runEnv.sh, the removal of components related to dispute management, and updates to the package.json file, including the removal of a dependency. The routing configuration has also been simplified by eliminating specific routes and components, streamlining the overall application structure.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
web-devtools/scripts/runEnv.sh, web/scripts/runEnv.sh	Updated sourceEnvFile to declare envFile as a local variable and changed the order of sourcing environment files.
web/package.json	Version incremented to 0.2.0; removed dependency "vanilla-jsoneditor": "^0.21.4".
web/src/app.tsx	Removed route for DisputeTemplateView component.
web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx	Removed HiddenLink styled component and isOpen state variable.
web/src/components/JSONEditor.tsx, web/src/pages/DisputeTemplateView/*	Deleted several components including JSONEditor, FetchDisputeRequestInput, FetchFromIdInput, and DisputeTemplateView.

Possibly related issues

• Court: remove code already moved to the Dev Tools package #1710: This pull request addresses the removal of the DisputeTemplateView and related components, which aligns with the objectives outlined in this issue.

Possibly related PRs

• chore(web): bump-ui-components-library-to-2.15.0 #1705: Involves modifications to the package.json file, similar to the changes in this PR.
• feat: update versions across v2 apps #1706: Also includes updates to the package.json, connecting it to the changes made in this PR.

Suggested labels

Type: Enhancement :sparkles:, Package: Web

Suggested reviewers

• alcercu

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
Components gone, we’ll never stop.
With scripts anew and routes so bright,
We simplify, make everything right!
A cleaner path for all to see,
Hooray for changes, hop with glee! 🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf3c630 and 75de07d.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock

📒 Files selected for processing (9)

• web-devtools/scripts/runEnv.sh (2 hunks)
• web/package.json (0 hunks)
• web/scripts/runEnv.sh (2 hunks)
• web/src/app.tsx (0 hunks)
• web/src/components/JSONEditor.tsx (0 hunks)
• web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx (1 hunks)
• web/src/pages/DisputeTemplateView/FetchDisputeRequestInput.tsx (0 hunks)
• web/src/pages/DisputeTemplateView/FetchFromIdInput.tsx (0 hunks)
• web/src/pages/DisputeTemplateView/index.tsx (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (6)

• web/package.json
• web/src/app.tsx
• web/src/components/JSONEditor.tsx
• web/src/pages/DisputeTemplateView/FetchDisputeRequestInput.tsx
• web/src/pages/DisputeTemplateView/FetchFromIdInput.tsx
• web/src/pages/DisputeTemplateView/index.tsx

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (7)

web-devtools/scripts/runEnv.sh (2)

24-24: Good improvement in variable scoping

The change to declare envFile as a local variable within the sourceEnvFile function is a positive improvement. This practice enhances the function's encapsulation and prevents potential naming conflicts with variables outside the function scope. It's a good example of following bash scripting best practices for better variable management.

---

36-36: Clarify the change in environment file sourcing order

The order of sourcing environment files has been modified. Now, the deployment-specific file ($envFile) is sourced before the public file ($envFile.public). This change alters the precedence of environment variables, potentially leading to unexpected behavior if there are conflicting variable definitions.

Could you please clarify the reasoning behind this change? It's important to ensure that this new order aligns with the intended configuration hierarchy and doesn't inadvertently override important settings.

To help assess the impact of this change, you may want to run the following command to check for any duplicate variable definitions across the environment files:

This script will help identify any variables that are defined in both the deployment-specific and public environment files, which could be affected by the new sourcing order.

web/scripts/runEnv.sh (3)

24-24: Improved variable scoping in sourceEnvFile function

The change to declare envFile as a local variable is a good practice. It enhances the function's encapsulation, prevents potential naming conflicts, and reduces the risk of unintended side effects. This improvement contributes to better maintainability of the script.

---

Line range hint 1-38: Acknowledgment of good scripting practices

I'd like to commend the overall quality of this script. It demonstrates several good practices:

1. Use of color coding for better readability of output.
2. Proper validation of input arguments.
3. Use of shellcheck directives for maintaining code quality.
4. Clear usage instructions when invalid input is provided.

These practices contribute to a more robust and user-friendly script. Keep up the good work!

---

35-36: Verify the impact of changed environment file sourcing order

The order of sourcing environment files has been modified. Now, the public environment file (.env.${deployment}.public) is sourced before the deployment-specific file (.env.${deployment}). This change could alter the precedence of environment variables, potentially affecting the application's behavior.

Could you please clarify the reasoning behind this change? It's important to ensure that this modification aligns with the intended configuration management strategy and doesn't introduce any unintended side effects.

To help assess the impact, you may want to run the following command to compare the contents of these files:

This script will help identify any overlapping variables between the public and deployment-specific files, allowing us to better understand the potential impact of the changed sourcing order.

✅ Verification successful

Verified: No Environment Files Found

The environment files targeted for sourcing (.env.<deployment>.public and .env.<deployment>) were not found in the repository. As a result, the change in the sourcing order does not currently impact the application's behavior.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare the contents of public and deployment-specific environment files

# Find all .env files
env_files=$(fd -e env)

# Loop through each deployment
for deployment in local devnet devnet-neo devnet-university testnet mainnet-neo; do
  echo "Comparing .env.${deployment}.public with .env.${deployment}:"
  
  public_file=$(echo "$env_files" | grep ".env.${deployment}.public")
  specific_file=$(echo "$env_files" | grep "^.env.${deployment}$")
  
  if [[ -f "$public_file" && -f "$specific_file" ]]; then
    diff -u "$public_file" "$specific_file" || true
  else
    echo "One or both files not found for $deployment"
  fi
  
  echo "----------------------------------------"
done

Length of output: 3065

web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx (2)

Line range hint 1-89: Overall impact seems minimal, but additional context needed

The changes to this component appear to be minimal and don't directly relate to the PR objective of removing the unused court DisputeTemplateView. The main functionality of rendering navigation links remains intact.

To better understand the context of these changes:

1. Could you provide more information on how the removal of isOpen relates to the PR objective?
2. Are there any other files where the main changes related to removing the DisputeTemplateView are implemented?

To verify the extent of changes related to the PR objective, let's run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for changes related to DisputeTemplateView removal

# Test 1: Look for removed files related to DisputeTemplateView
echo "Checking for removed files:"
git diff --name-only --diff-filter=D $(git merge-base HEAD main)

# Test 2: Search for significant changes in other files
echo "Searching for significant changes in other files:"
git diff --stat $(git merge-base HEAD main) | sort -rn -k2 | head -n 5

# Test 3: Check for changes in routing configuration
echo "Checking for changes in routing configuration:"
git diff $(git merge-base HEAD main) -- '**/router*' '**/routes*'

This script will help us identify the main changes related to the PR objective and provide a better context for the modifications in this file.

---

64-64: LGTM, but clarification needed on toggleIsOpen usage

The removal of isOpen from the useOpenContext hook aligns with the simplification mentioned in the summary. However, toggleIsOpen is still being destructured and used in the component.

Could you clarify the continued usage of toggleIsOpen in this component? Is it still necessary?

To verify the removal of dispute-related functionality, let's run the following script:

This script will help us ensure that all dispute-related functionality has been properly removed as per the PR objective.

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[netlify]

❌ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university failed. Why did it fail? →

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	75de07d
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-university/deploys/670d7fac11abb600080d98ca

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	75de07d
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-neo/deploys/670d7fac846c510008e6cd86
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1712--kleros-v2-neo.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	75de07d
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-testnet/deploys/670d7fac30627e000888aabd
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1712--kleros-v2-testnet.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[codeclimate]

Code Climate has analyzed commit 75de07d and detected 151 issues on this pull request.

Here's the issue category breakdown:

Category	Count
Complexity	4
Duplication	66
Style	81

View more on Code Climate.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	75de07d
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-testnet-devtools/deploys/670d7fac3f996000089bc494
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1712--kleros-v2-testnet-devtools.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[Harman-singh-waraich]

lgtm