Passing context info in onTick function

[ibansal]

We need to pass context info in onTick function the way this is implemented in setInterval, any support for this.

[ncb000gt]

Hmm. I can see this being useful. The tradeoff is that you do not get to call this.stop() from within the callback. I think this is probably fine.

It will default to calling the onComplete function within the scope of the job.

Thoughts?

[ncb000gt]

I've got one other feature I want to work out before pushing a new version. Once that is done I'll publish. For now you can use the code from master to accomplish what you want.

Also, I just noticed that I called it onComplete in the in the commit and comment...that is just what it is called internally in the code. The tests are for the onTick function.

[ncb000gt]

This has been published to npm in v1.0.1.

[ibansal]

Great ... thanks...

[Danielv3]

Hello. My code is using 1.3.0 version and I'm not able to send a custom context to the onTick function. If I don't send any context, the this.stop() method cannot be called neither because stop is not a function... Any ideas? thnks.

[ncb000gt]

@Danielv3 do you have a code sample you're using?

[Danielv3]

I solved the issue. You need to use "function() {}" instead of the newly arrow functions "() => {}" in order to be able to use "this" as context. In the newer arrow format you don't receive the context in this.

[charliecode]

I also had a similar issue as @Danielv3 while using a fat arrow function within a class on the onTick method. Because fat arrow functions get their "this" value from their enclosing lexical context and not the actual context they are within you don't actually get the cronJob attached to the "this" keyword inside the onTick function. Only a suggestion, but with more and more people using arrow functions by default it might be a good idea to add something to the docs about this. Arrow functions should not be used for the onTick method, only regular javascript functions.

[ncb000gt]

@charliecode I added a note, thanks for the suggestion.

[NonPolynomial]

Is there any plans to support arrow functions or are there any particular reasons against them?
It should be easy to pass the this context as a parameter to arrow functions.
E.g.

onTick(this)

[ncb000gt]

I'd review a pr for this if you're interested and able, but at the moment I'm too busy with other work to focus on it.

…

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019, 10:40 AM Sascha ***@***.***> wrote: Is there any plans to support arrow functions or are there any particular reasons against them? It should be easy to pass the this context as a parameter to arrow functions. E.g. onTick(this) — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#47 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAPJF2FXGAPHAER4ABCNLTPR4NUJANCNFSM4ABFUB2Q> .

[NonPolynomial]

I'll have a look into it.

[NonPolynomial]

@ncb000gt currently there is the onComplete function that is passed to the onTick function.
Should that stay unchanged?
Users could instead call either this.onComplete() or - after my change - job.onComplete() to execute that function.

Context

[Kapsonfire-DE]

its more easy to use .apply or .call and pass the correct this param