docs: Instructions on custom Airflow Operators #267
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
astrojuanlu
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2023
sbrugman
changed the title
|
The DCO bot is acting up @sbrugman, could you rebase and sign-off the last commit. Sorry about this :) |
Signed-off-by: Simon Brugman <[email protected]>
PtrBld
pushed a commit
to PtrBld/kedro-plugins
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2023
instructions on custom Airflow Operators Signed-off-by: Simon Brugman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Document how to use alternative Airflow Operators.
kedro-airflowshould not support all operators in the current situation: apart from there being too many to keep track of, this would introduce unnecessary maintenance burden.Being explicit about the non-goals of a project is better than leave it undocumented.
Note that these instructions remain valid if the template would be written using the TaskFlow syntax as proposed in #25.
Open for discussion of course.
Development notes
Closes #27
Checklist
RELEASE.mdfile