Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
btrfs: tree-checker: Check leaf chunk item size
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Inspired by btrfs-progs github issue torvalds#208, where chunk item in chunk
tree has invalid num_stripes (0).

Although that can already be caught by current btrfs_check_chunk_valid(),
that function doesn't really check item size as it needs to handle chunk
item in super block sys_chunk_array().

This patch will add two extra checks for chunk items in chunk tree:

- Basic chunk item size
  If the item is smaller than btrfs_chunk (which already contains one
  stripe), exit right now as reading num_stripes may even go beyond
  eb boundary.

- Item size check against num_stripes
  If item size doesn't match with calculated chunk size, then either the
  item size or the num_stripes is corrupted. Error out anyway.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
adam900710 authored and kdave committed Jan 6, 2020
1 parent 0cdebad commit 7947b70
Showing 1 changed file with 39 additions and 1 deletion.
40 changes: 39 additions & 1 deletion fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -738,6 +738,44 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
return 0;
}

/*
* Enhanced version of chunk item checker.
*
* The common btrfs_check_chunk_valid() doesn't check item size since it needs
* to work on super block sys_chunk_array which doesn't have full item ptr.
*/
static int check_leaf_chunk_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
struct btrfs_chunk *chunk,
struct btrfs_key *key, int slot)
{
int num_stripes;

if (btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot) < sizeof(struct btrfs_chunk)) {
chunk_err(leaf, chunk, key->offset,
"invalid chunk item size: have %u expect [%zu, %u)",
btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot),
sizeof(struct btrfs_chunk),
BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(leaf->fs_info));
return -EUCLEAN;
}

num_stripes = btrfs_chunk_num_stripes(leaf, chunk);
/* Let btrfs_check_chunk_valid() handle this error type */
if (num_stripes == 0)
goto out;

if (btrfs_chunk_item_size(num_stripes) !=
btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot)) {
chunk_err(leaf, chunk, key->offset,
"invalid chunk item size: have %u expect %lu",
btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot),
btrfs_chunk_item_size(num_stripes));
return -EUCLEAN;
}
out:
return btrfs_check_chunk_valid(leaf, chunk, key->offset);
}

__printf(3, 4)
__cold
static void dev_item_err(const struct extent_buffer *eb, int slot,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1384,7 +1422,7 @@ static int check_leaf_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
break;
case BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY:
chunk = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_chunk);
ret = btrfs_check_chunk_valid(leaf, chunk, key->offset);
ret = check_leaf_chunk_item(leaf, chunk, key, slot);
break;
case BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY:
ret = check_dev_item(leaf, key, slot);
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 7947b70

Please sign in to comment.