-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Flaky Coveralls failures #813
Flaky Coveralls failures #813
Conversation
Thanks for your PR,
To skip the vendors CIs, Maintainers can use one of:
|
77df5f8
to
1bd65a7
Compare
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12274846267Details
💛 - Coveralls |
).ToNot(HaveOccurred()) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
It("field is correctly written to the SriovNetworkNodePolicy", func() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
*SriovNetworkNodePolicy
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SriovNetworkNodeState?
Signed-off-by: Andrea Panattoni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Panattoni <[email protected]>
1bd65a7
to
fdffa3d
Compare
This PR wants to solve the failures of the Coveralls actions: sometimes, the function
findNodePoolConfig(...)
results in low coverage. This is probably because of some test flakiness.Also, the CI invokes
make test-controllers
andCLUSTER_TYPE=openshift make test-controllers
. Both steps overridescover-controllers.out
and the proposed changes avoid this problem.see following sample builds: