-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow switchdev+externallyManged configs in webhook #675
Allow switchdev+externallyManged configs in webhook #675
Conversation
Thanks for your PR,
To skip the vendors CIs use one of:
|
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8718120638Details
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please, add a link to commit which implements Current implementation supports this combination
if you'll do one more change to this PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you please add one or two unit tests to cover a validation case
switch dev but no vf, the other way around (both failed ) and one that pass the validation
9dc733d
to
11ccbba
Compare
Thanks for your PR,
To skip the vendors CIs use one of:
|
thanks @SchSeba, |
Current implementation supports this combination. NIC should be already in switchdev mode and have enough VFs to pass the check. Signed-off-by: Yury Kulazhenkov <[email protected]>
11ccbba
to
e3ac636
Compare
Thanks for your PR,
To skip the vendors CIs use one of:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR rebased
@SchSeba I rebased the PR and added some tests. PTAL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
nice work!
Current implementation supports this combination.
NIC should be already in switchdev mode and have enough VFs to pass checks in the operator.
cc @e0ne @zeeke @SchSeba