chore: uninstall danger.js and remove from dependencies (Issue #493)

[Jimmy-Vu]

Description

The danger.js package is uninstalled (using npm uninstall --save-dev danger) from the project along with its related config files. .travis.yml is deleted following guidance in the issue discussion.

Fixes #493

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Documentation update

Checklist:

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• My commits follow the commitizen commit convention
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.

[Jimmy-Vu]

There seems to be a problem with the lint checks (from the lint.yml file) for when I make a pull request from the Jimmy-Vu:CIO-493-uninstall-danger branch in my forked repo into the typescript-migration branch of this upstream repo. It doesn't think that my branch exist.

Error from the prettier lint check:

Determining the checkout info
  /usr/bin/git branch --list --remote origin/CIO-493-uninstall-danger
  /usr/bin/git tag --list CIO-493-uninstall-danger
  Error: A branch or tag with the name 'CIO-493-uninstall-danger' could not be found

I found this potential fix in this comment in an issue that seems to relate closely to what's occurring here. Could be worth a look.

[jwu910]

oooh thanks, i'll try to take a look when I can and get the required changes into my branch

[jwu910]

Hey @Jimmy-Vu my bad for not getting back to this sooner.

Can you take a look at the failing checks before we move forward?

Edit: This actually might be a faulty workflow file on my end... I dont think i've had any pull requests since i had merged the new workflow in myself

[Jimmy-Vu]

Hey @jwu910, thanks for the heads up. Just to confirm I understand your edit message, is there something left to do on my end for this issue or is it just waiting for the workflow file to be fixed?

[jwu910]

I gotta take a look at the workflow first, once I can debug that we'll be able to see how the checks resolve