feat: add package_ignore_dependencies option

[betaboon]

No description provided.

[jvolkman]

Overall I think this is fine. I don't love the proliferation of package_xyz_dependencies attributes we've got going on, but that's the model for now. I don't know of a better user experience; maybe something like package "annotations".

Another thought I had about this particular problem was declaring "package groups" or something - basically one package would contain multiple wheels. But that's a larger change with presumably hairy edge cases.

[betaboon]

Overall I think this is fine. I don't love the proliferation of package_xyz_dependencies attributes we've got going on, but that's the model for now. I don't know of a better user experience; maybe something like package "annotations".

Another thought I had about this particular problem was declaring "package groups" or something - basically one package would contain multiple wheels. But that's a larger change with presumably hairy edge cases.

yes. i think we can do some rework here.

another issue we could address: when package_build_dependencies are defined, but the package goes away (eg because of renovate updating) the whole thing will break.