Use shorter sample names.

chapters/appendices/CP2.6B_data.tex

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 % !TEX root = ../../thesis.tex
-\section{CP2.6B data}
+\section{CP2 data}
 \label{app:CP2.6B-data}

chapters/samples/CP1.2H/fabrication.tex

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 		\subcaption{Zoomed in view of the dc-SQUID. The width of the junctions is \qty{19}{\nano\meter}. The viewing angle is \qty{30}{\degree}.}
 	\end{subfigure}
 
-	\caption{Fine structures of sample CP1.2H after the FIB. Table~\ref{tab:CP1.6H-geometries} shows the exact geometries of the sample.}
+	\caption{Fine structures of sample CP1 after the FIB. Table~\ref{tab:CP1.6H-geometries} shows the exact geometries of the sample.}
 	\label{fig:CP1.2H-SEM-images}
 \end{figure}
 

chapters/samples/CP1.2H/results.tex

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 	\centering
 	\import{figures/samples/CP1}{CP1.2H_critical_temperature.pgf}
 	\caption{
-		RT-curve of sample CP1.2H. The main figure provides a detailed view of the superconducting transition at \qty{8}{\kelvin}. The inset provides an overview of resistance between \qtyrange{2}{300}{\kelvin} which is mostly linear.
+		RT-curve of sample CP1. The main figure provides a detailed view of the superconducting transition at \qty{8}{\kelvin}. The inset provides an overview of resistance between \qtyrange{2}{300}{\kelvin} which is mostly linear.
 	}
 	\label{fig:CP1.2H-SQUID-RT}
 \end{figure}

chapters/samples/CP2.6B/fabrication.tex

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 		\subcaption{Zoomed in view of the dc-SQUID. The width of the junctions is \qty{22}{\nano\meter}.}
 	\end{subfigure}
 
-	\caption{Fine structures of sample CP2.6B after the FIB. Table~\ref{tab:CP2.6B-geometries} shows the exact geometries of the sample.}
+	\caption{Fine structures of sample CP2 after the FIB. Table~\ref{tab:CP2.6B-geometries} shows the exact geometries of the sample.}
 	\label{fig:CP2.6B-SEM-images}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -43,6 +43,6 @@
     		\bottomrule
     	\end{tabular}
     \end{subtable}
-    \caption{The \textbf{left} table provides an overview of the geometries of CP2.6B as determined by SEM imaging and sputtering rates. The \textbf{right} table gives an overview of parameters found using a simulation based on the geometries. The geometries are based on sample CP1.2H.}
+    \caption{The \textbf{left} table provides an overview of the geometries of CP2 as determined by SEM imaging and sputtering rates. The \textbf{right} table gives an overview of parameters found using a simulation based on the geometries. The geometries are based on sample CP1.}
     \label{tab:CP2.6B-geometries}
 \end{table}

chapters/samples/CP2.6B_revisited/main.tex

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 % !TEX root = ../../../thesis.tex
-After the failure of sample CP3.5A we revisited sample CP2.6B. By increasing the temperature it is possible to lower $I_c$. This opens the possibility to go into a non-hysteric regime by decreasing the screening parameter. Refer to Section~\ref{sec:CP3.5A-fabrication} for more information. The reason this was not attempted earlier is because the magnet controller was broken. As such it was not possible to measure SQIs at higher temperatures and consequently to measure the CPR at higher temperatures. The sample has not been altered, as such the reader is referred to Section~\ref{sec:CP2.6B-fabrication} for the geometries.
+After the failure of sample CP3 we revisited sample CP2. By increasing the temperature it is possible to lower $I_c$. This opens the possibility to go into a non-hysteric regime by decreasing the screening parameter. Refer to Section~\ref{sec:CP3.5A-fabrication} for more information. The reason this was not attempted earlier is because the magnet controller was broken. As such it was not possible to measure SQIs at higher temperatures and consequently to measure the CPR at higher temperatures. The sample has not been altered, as such the reader is referred to Section~\ref{sec:CP2.6B-fabrication} for the geometries.
 
 \subsection{Results and discussion}
 \input{chapters/samples/CP2.6B_revisited/results}

chapters/samples/CP2.6B_revisited/results.tex

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 \begin{figure}[ht!]
 	\centering
 	\input{figures/samples/CP2/CP2.6B_revisited_SQIs.pgf}
-	\caption{SQIs at \qtyrange{2.8}{3.6}{\kelvin} of sample CP2.6B. We note that they appear to have a slightly curved background. We used a bias current of \qty{300}{\micro\ampere} except for \qty{2.8}{\kelvin} where \qty{350}{\micro\ampere} was used. Near zero field the patterns seem quite stable but further out become more noisy.}
+	\caption{SQIs at \qtyrange{2.8}{3.6}{\kelvin} of sample CP2. We note that they appear to have a slightly curved background. We used a bias current of \qty{300}{\micro\ampere} except for \qty{2.8}{\kelvin} where \qty{350}{\micro\ampere} was used. Near zero field the patterns seem quite stable but further out become more noisy.}
 	\label{fig:CP2.6B_revisited_SQIs}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 \begin{figure}[ht!]
 	\centering
 	\input{figures/samples/CP2/CP2.6B_revisited_CPRs.pgf}
-	\caption{Various current-phase relations measured on sample CP2.6B in a range of \qtyrange{2.8}{3.6}{\kelvin}. The CPRs have been visually offset by \qty{150}{\micro\ampere}. The dashed lines denote zero current.}
+	\caption{Various current-phase relations measured on sample CP2 in a range of \qtyrange{2.8}{3.6}{\kelvin}. The CPRs have been visually offset by \qty{150}{\micro\ampere}. The dashed lines denote zero current.}
 	\label{fig:CP2.6B_revisited_CPRs}
 \end{figure}
 

chapters/samples/CP3.5A/fabrication.tex

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
 		\subcaption{Zoomed in view of the junction, the width of the junction is \qty{12}{\nano\meter}.}
 	\end{subfigure}
 
-	\caption{Fine structures of sample CP3.5A after the FIB. Table~\ref{tab:CP3.5A-geometries} shows the exact geometries of the sample.}
+	\caption{Fine structures of sample CP3 after the FIB. Table~\ref{tab:CP3.5A-geometries} shows the exact geometries of the sample.}
 	\label{fig:CP3.5A-SEM-images}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -68,6 +68,6 @@
     		\bottomrule
     	\end{tabular}
     \end{subtable}
-    \caption{The \textbf{left} table provides an overview of the geometries of CP3.5A as determined by SEM imaging and sputtering rates. The \textbf{right} table gives an overview of parameters found using a simulation based on the geometries. For the dc-SQUID two diameters are shown as it is slightly rectangular.}
+    \caption{The \textbf{left} table provides an overview of the geometries of CP3 as determined by SEM imaging and sputtering rates. The \textbf{right} table gives an overview of parameters found using a simulation based on the geometries. For the dc-SQUID two diameters are shown as it is slightly rectangular.}
     \label{tab:CP3.5A-geometries}
 \end{table}

chapters/samples/CP3.5A/results.tex

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 \begin{figure}[ht!]	
 	\centering
 	\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{figures/samples/CP3/CP3.5A_SEM_blown_up.jpg}
-	\caption{The remains of sample CP3.5A. Figure~\ref{fig:CP3.5A-SEM-images} shows what the sample originally looked like.}
+	\caption{The remains of sample CP3. Figure~\ref{fig:CP3.5A-SEM-images} shows what the sample originally looked like.}
 	\label{fig:CP3.5A-remains}
 \end{figure}
 

chapters/samples/main.tex

@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
 % !TEX root = ../../thesis.tex
 \chapter{Samples}
-In this chapter our results are presented on a per sample basis. The results of the first sample, CP1.2H, are not directly useful towards our goal. However, it has thought us a great deal about working with the setup and proved relevant in choosing the geometries for the second sample, CP2.6B. The second sample produced the first real results and shows the feasibility of the method. In our final sample, CP3.5A, further improvements were made based on the results of the second sample. This sample was destroyed before any useful measurements were taken. It has been included because of its potential for future research. After this sample CP2.6B was revisited and produced the bulk of our important results.
+In this chapter our results are presented on a per sample basis. The results of the first sample, CP1, are not directly useful towards our goal. However, it has thought us a great deal about working with the setup and proved relevant in choosing the geometries for the second sample, CP2. The second sample produced the first real results and shows the feasibility of the method. In our final sample, CP3, further improvements were made based on the results of the second sample. This sample was destroyed before any useful measurements were taken. It has been included because of its potential for future research. After this sample CP2 was revisited and produced the bulk of our important results.
 
-\section{Sample CP1.2H}
+\section{Sample CP1}
 \input{chapters/samples/CP1.2H/main}
 
 \newpage
-\section{Sample CP2.6B}
+\section{Sample CP2}
 \input{chapters/samples/CP2.6B/main}
 
 \newpage
-\section{Sample CP3.5A}
+\section{Sample CP3}
 \input{chapters/samples/CP3.5A/main}
 
 \newpage
-\section{Sample CP2.6B revisited}
+\section{Sample CP2 revisited}
 \input{chapters/samples/CP2.6B_revisited/main}