-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Puma 6.2.1 warns about threads started in app boot #170
Comments
I think you're right that we can mark the thread as fork-safe, since we'll detect if the PID changes and start a separate reporter thread for each fork. judoscale-ruby/judoscale-ruby/lib/judoscale/reporter.rb Lines 66 to 68 in 3c30f60
I swear we've had this discussion before, but I can't find any history of it. 🤔 |
carlosantoniodasilva
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 9, 2024
This prevents the Reporter thread from generating warnings with puma, which has been warning on any threads created before forking. The Reporter thread is aware of forking by keeping the current `pid` around, and initializing another thread if the `pid` changes. It means we still have a running Reporter on the main puma process in this case, plus one for each forked process (if running in cluster mode, in case of puma.) References: rails/rails#40399 puma/puma#2475 https://github.com/puma/puma/releases/tag/v5.1.0 Closes #170
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi there,
Ever since the 5.x.x release, Puma detects and warns threads that are started in app boot (before the forking process) as you can see here. I am currently seeing the judoscale gem as one of those threads in my app(I think the thread that reports web metrics are instantiated once in the Runner process when running in cluster mode?)
It seems to me that this thread should be marked as fork safe as it was on rails connection pooling since Puma should not be worried about it.
Is my analysis correct? Is there something that I can help to fix this warning?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: