We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
See
Your tests don't pass with the new crs logic in upcoming sf. You could for instance use
expect_true(st_crs(toUTM(big_combined)) == st_crs(toUTM(sunapee$sp$NHDWaterbody)))
as an alternative: these crs are (now) semantically equal, but different in their represenation. Pls modify and submit to CRAN.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
3b63645
Changed to use the suggested logic. FWIW I updated my sf to the 0.9 but didn't raise any errors with the old test logic...
sf
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
See
Your tests don't pass with the new crs logic in upcoming sf. You could for instance use
as an alternative: these crs are (now) semantically equal, but different in their represenation. Pls modify and submit to CRAN.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: