Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(container): update system upgrade controller group to v0.14.2 (minor) #379

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 28, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
docker.io/rancher/system-upgrade-controller minor v0.13.4 -> v0.14.2
rancher/system-upgrade-controller minor v0.13.4 -> v0.14.2

Release Notes

rancher/system-upgrade-controller (rancher/system-upgrade-controller)

v0.14.2

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: rancher/system-upgrade-controller@v0.14.1...v0.14.2

v0.14.1

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: rancher/system-upgrade-controller@v0.14.0...v0.14.1

v0.14.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: rancher/system-upgrade-controller@v0.13.4...v0.14.0


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "on saturday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@jsaveker
Copy link
Owner

Here is an automated review from ChatGPT of this pull request.

Based on the provided "git diff", the changes are mainly about updating the version of the system-upgrade-controller used, from v0.13.4 to v0.14.0, both in the Helm release (helmrelease.yaml.j2) and the Kustomization resources (kustomization.yaml.j2). There are no direct security vulnerabilities introduced by just updating version numbers in these configuration files. However, there are a few considerations and best practices to ensure this update does not indirectly introduce security issues:

1. Validate New Version Security:

  • Issue: Without explicitly reviewing the security implications of the new version (v0.14.0), there's a risk if this version has known vulnerabilities that were not present in v0.13.4.

  • Fix: Before adopting the new version, check the release notes and security advisories related to v0.14.0 of the system-upgrade-controller. This can be generally done via the project's GitHub repository or dedicated security advisories pages.

    #### Validation Steps:
    1. Review the [GitHub release notes](https://github.com/rancher/system-upgrade-controller/releases/tag/v0.14.0) for `v0.14.0`.
    2. Check the [GitHub Security Advisories page](https://github.com/rancher/system-upgrade-controller/security/advisories) for the project.
    3. Validate that the version does not introduce new, unresolved vulnerabilities.

2. Dependency Verification:

  • Issue: Changing URLs in configuration files for downloading resources without verifying their authenticity exposes the risk of Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks or downloading tampered resources.

  • Fix: Ensure that the new resource URL (pointing to the new version of the CRD) is correct and comes from a trusted source. Additionally, if possible, verify the checksum or signature of the downloaded resource.

    #### Verification Steps:
    1. Verify the `crd.yaml` download URL is from the official [Rancher GitHub repository](https://github.com/rancher/system-upgrade-controller).
    2. If available, verify the checksum/signature of `crd.yaml` after download against officially provided cryptographic hashes to ensure integrity.

No Direct Security Vulnerabilities:

Based on the "git diff", there are no direct security vulnerabilities identified, provided the new version and resources have been properly validated for security and integrity as suggested. The changes are version updates, and the security posture would largely depend on the specific changes and security considerations of the version being adopted.

In Summary: No explicit security issues are identified from the diffs themselves, but ensuring the security and integrity of the versions and resources being updated is crucial.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title feat(container): update system upgrade controller group to v0.14.0 (minor) feat(container): update system upgrade controller group to v0.14.1 (minor) Sep 29, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/system-upgrade-controller branch from 8e0a84a to 8741f43 Compare September 29, 2024 00:34
@renovate renovate bot changed the title feat(container): update system upgrade controller group to v0.14.1 (minor) feat(container): update system upgrade controller group to v0.14.2 (minor) Oct 23, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/system-upgrade-controller branch from 8741f43 to 2979ef9 Compare October 23, 2024 02:10
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/system-upgrade-controller branch from 2979ef9 to fbdd2a7 Compare December 6, 2024 03:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant