Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 18, 2024. It is now read-only.

Made row_group::get_field_columns public #1110

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2022

Conversation

ritchie46
Copy link
Collaborator

@ritchie46 ritchie46 commented Jun 27, 2022

This function can be used when reading synchronously multiple columns from a parquet file in parallel.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 27, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1110 (53ce452) into main (a11e258) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1110      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.31%   81.29%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         366      366              
  Lines       35352    35352              
==========================================
- Hits        28746    28741       -5     
- Misses       6606     6611       +5     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/io/parquet/read/row_group.rs 99.40% <100.00%> (ø)
src/io/ipc/read/array/boolean.rs 89.58% <0.00%> (-8.34%) ⬇️
src/array/binary/mod.rs 88.88% <0.00%> (-1.24%) ⬇️
src/bitmap/utils/slice_iterator.rs 97.56% <0.00%> (-1.22%) ⬇️
src/array/utf8/mod.rs 91.74% <0.00%> (+0.95%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a11e258...53ce452. Read the comment docs.

@jorgecarleitao jorgecarleitao changed the title make row_group::get_field_columns public Made row_group::get_field_columns public Jun 28, 2022
@jorgecarleitao jorgecarleitao merged commit 3b05377 into jorgecarleitao:main Jun 28, 2022
@jorgecarleitao jorgecarleitao added the enhancement An improvement to an existing feature label Jun 28, 2022
@ritchie46 ritchie46 deleted the pub_get_field_columns branch June 28, 2022 10:01
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement An improvement to an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants