Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[4.0] Change com_fields to services #21420

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Aug 22, 2018

Conversation

laoneo
Copy link
Member

@laoneo laoneo commented Aug 6, 2018

Moves com_fields to the service based extension setup.

See #20217 for details.

* @license GNU General Public License version 2 or later; see LICENSE.txt
*/

namespace Joomla\Component\Fields\Site\Dispatcher;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given this is documented as basically the public API to the component, should we move this to the libraries folder? https://docs.joomla.org/J3.x:Adding_custom_fields/Implement_into_your_component#Public_helper_classes_and_API

Genuinely not sure if it's a good or bad idea - but I guess if we're namespacing it nows the time to do it if we're going to....

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It uses models from com_fields so I would not move stuff to libraries with a dependency to an extension (I know we did that in the past).

@wilsonge
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry can you fix the conflicts here and I'll merge this

@laoneo
Copy link
Member Author

laoneo commented Aug 22, 2018

Done

@wilsonge wilsonge merged commit d6abb18 into joomla:4.0-dev Aug 22, 2018
@wilsonge wilsonge deleted the j4/services/fields branch August 22, 2018 11:13
@zero-24 zero-24 added this to the Joomla 4.0 milestone Aug 24, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants