-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[4.0] Test upgrade path from Joomla 3 to Joomla 4 on Postgres #25467
Comments
Ok, will do that tomorrow evening after work, German time. |
let me invite @twister65 to this postgresql party |
I have this error during the upgrade: joomla-cms/administrator/components/com_admin/sql/updates/postgresql/4.0.0-2016-10-02.sql Lines 7 to 8 in 0f83986
is not correct, it should be: '1970-01-01 00:00:00' instead of '0000-00-00 00:00:00' |
I've got the same error with MySQL. |
After building a new update package, I have this error: joomla-cms/administrator/components/com_admin/sql/updates/postgresql/4.0.0-2016-10-02.sql Lines 11 to 12 in 0f83986
|
@twister65 can you add your findings to #25461 if you want |
@alikon , I can't push in your branch:
Should I make a PR ? |
@twister65 Would be good if you could make a PR. I don't think it was a good idea by @alikon to add that to his PR, because his PR is focused on mysql and we should not mix things. |
not a problem do as it is best for you |
@wilsonge With twister's PR #25477 applied to the update package from last nightly build, the SQL errors disappear, and the behavior becomes like you described above, i.e. there are "template not found" warnings, but they disappear when update is finished and you are navigating through backend. So that PR makes the update finish without crash. But there remain other issues to be handled. The first thing I saw is that com_search has been removed, but the menu entry in the left side admin menu in backend is still there. I don't dare to think about what will happen when updating a site with a search module in frontend. Do you have any plan for that already? |
Closed as having Pull Request #25477 |
@alikon @richard67 (or anyone else running postgres) can you please test the following:
Caveats:
However I expect the upgrade to actually work in functionality
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: