Tbdb.bed vs genome.gff coordinates question #398
-
Hi Jody, I just wanted to clarify the positions in the https://github.com/jodyphelan/TBProfiler/blob/master/db/tbdb.bed file vs the https://github.com/jodyphelan/TBProfiler/blob/master/db/tbdb.gff file As an example: Rv2752c is listed as having an end position 3066191 in the tbdb.gff Chromosome ena gene 3064515 3066191 . - . ID=gene:Rv2752c; In the tbdb.bed it is listed as having an end position of 3067372 (but the same start position) Chromosome 3064515 3067372 Rv2752c Rv2752c levofloxacin,moxifloxacin,isoniazid,rifampicin,ethambutol Is the difference in end position related to upstream variants that may impact gene resistance? Another example is Rv0010c Thank you for your time, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi Tara, Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. Yes the start position in the bed file contains the upstream region where potential promoter mutations may be. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi Tara,
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. Yes the start position in the bed file contains the upstream region where potential promoter mutations may be.