Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Org Mode Reader: headline after items #1650

Closed
harryherold opened this issue Sep 27, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

Org Mode Reader: headline after items #1650

harryherold opened this issue Sep 27, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@harryherold
Copy link

I processed the following org

* first
haha
* sec
  - foo
  - bar
  - baz
* third
foobarbaz

I get in mediawiki

= first =
haha
= sec =
* foo
* bar
* baz
* third foobarbaz

Pandoc add a headline after a list to the list, if i convert Org to mediawiki
@mpickering
Copy link
Collaborator

Can you please surround your code samples with three backticks (```) so we can see what's going on!

thumphries added a commit to thumphries/pandoc that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2014
@thumphries
Respect indent when parsing Org bullet lists
4f4b0f0 
Fixes issue with top-level bullet list parsing.
Previously we would use `many1 spaceChars` rather than respecting
the list's indent level. We also permitted `*` bullets on unindented
lists, which should unambiguously parse as `header 1`.
Combined, this meant headers at a different indent level were
being unwittingly slurped into preceding bullet lists, as per
Issue jgm#1650.
@thumphries thumphries mentioned this issue Oct 12, 2014
Merged
@tarleb tarleb mentioned this issue Oct 17, 2014
Closed
thumphries added a commit to thumphries/pandoc that referenced this issue Oct 18, 2014
@thumphries
Fix indent issue for definition lists
f1f56e8 
Tidy up fix for jgm#1650, jgm#1698 as per comments in jgm#1680.
Fix same issue for definition lists with the same method.
@tarleb
Copy link
Collaborator

tarleb commented Oct 19, 2014

A fix (#1680) has just been merged into the master branch. Would you test if it resolves this issue?

@jgm jgm closed this as completed Oct 19, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@jgm @tarleb @mpickering @harryherold