-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Kill jsr-305 #4604
Merged
Merged
Kill jsr-305 #4604
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5abd08c
s/javax.annotation.CheckReturnValue/edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations.C…
jtnord a7fcc8e
s/javax.annotation.Nullable/edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations.Nullable/g
jtnord 928d40f
s/javax.annotation.OverridingMethodsMustInvokeSuper/edu.umd.cs.findbu…
jtnord 819f80b
s/javax.annotation.Nonnull/edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations.NonNull/g
jtnord 05e2b23
remove invalid NonNull annotation on a ctor
jtnord 1f94696
s/javax.annotation.CheckForNull/edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations.Check…
jtnord 6b5c81d
s/javax.annotation.concurrent.GuardedBy/net.jcip.annotations.GuardedBy/
jtnord ba30c4b
s/javax.annotation.concurrent.Immutable/net.jcip.annotations.Immutable/
jtnord 5674de1
remove Nonnegative annotation from JSR-305
jtnord 4d3e60a
add checkstyle rule to prevent re-introduction of jsr-305
jtnord bdcb2fb
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into kill-jsr-305
jtnord 4de2344
don't bundled jsr-305 in the war
jtnord f7f07b8
ignore .checkstyle files
jtnord 6552e6d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into kill-jsr-305
jtnord 538b9cc
Another JSR-305 annotation crept into master
jtnord af115fd
Keep the sole netbeans user (aka Jesse) happy :-)
jtnord 7f8cea0
Merge branch 'master' into kill-jsr-305
timja f0e3a7d
Fix compilation error after merge
timja File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would be nice to have this in a file,
here's an example of how we got it working in multi module with jcasc:
https://github.com/jenkinsci/configuration-as-code-plugin/blob/master/pom.xml#L82
non-blocking though
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the pointer.
Given I have no idea if tools (eclipse intellij netbeans etc) all cope with that correctly (given it is set by the mvn wrapper) - and not everyone imports all the projects in a multi module setup, I'll stick which this for now as I know it to work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Justification for rejecting this feedback seems weak. Done in #6552.