Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unnecessary jelly conditional code #94

Conversation

MarkEWaite
Copy link
Contributor

Remove unnecessary jelly conditional code

The configuration form modernization happened in Jenkins 2.277.1. This plugin requires at least Jenkins 2.361.4. The divBasedFormLayout conditional will always be true. Inline the

tags rather than using a conditional.

Testing done

Interactively tested to assure that I could see the message in the modified file and that it was displayed correctly without surprised. Ran more tests based on the description in JENKINS_67814 and confirmed those cases are working correctly as well.

Submitter checklist

  • Make sure you are opening from a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side) and not your main branch!
  • Ensure that the pull request title represents the desired changelog entry
  • Please describe what you did
  • Link to relevant issues in GitHub or Jira
  • Link to relevant pull requests, esp. upstream and downstream changes

The configuration form modernization happened in Jenkins 2.277.1.
This plugin requires at least Jenkins 2.361.4.  The divBasedFormLayout
conditional will always be true.  Inline the <div> tags rather than
using a conditional.
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite requested a review from a team as a code owner December 4, 2023 22:12
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite added the chore Maintenance label Dec 4, 2023
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite merged commit a06b4ee into jenkinsci:master Dec 4, 2023
13 checks passed
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite deleted the remove-divBasedFormLayout-conditional branch December 4, 2023 22:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chore Maintenance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant