Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Undefined behavior clause added for invalid ctx value #8

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

wrrobin
Copy link

@wrrobin wrrobin commented Feb 5, 2020

Signed-off-by: Md [email protected]

@jdinan
Copy link
Owner

jdinan commented Feb 11, 2020

This looks good, but all of these changes are to sections owned by the RMA/AMO/Signals section committee. Can you please post this as a PR to their branch? That will ensure it is integrated with other edits they may be making to the same text.

@wrrobin
Copy link
Author

wrrobin commented Feb 11, 2020

Thanks @jdinan. Will do once we have a branch for that section.

@wrrobin
Copy link
Author

wrrobin commented Feb 12, 2020

@shamisp Should I add this PR comparing against shamisp:topic/1.5/rma_edits?

@wrrobin
Copy link
Author

wrrobin commented Feb 14, 2020

Moved to shamisp:sec/rma/1.5.0#2

@wrrobin wrrobin closed this Feb 14, 2020
jdinan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2020
jdinan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants