"Remote PE" fixes

[davidozog]

Summary of changes

8f25d8c does a global search for "remote PE(s)", and replaces with "target PE(s)" in an attempt to resolve this issue:
https://github.com/orgs/openshmem-org/projects/5/views/1?pane=issue&itemId=78784978.

5e91123 replaces each instance of "specified PE" with "specified target PE", if so desired.

Proposal Checklist

• Link to issue(s)
• Changelog entry
• Reviewed for changes to front matter
• Reviewed for changes to back matter

[jdinan]

@davidozog This makes sense to merge into the doc edit branch since it touches everything. :) I will ask that we review this very carefully for escapes, as there are likely instances where we use some other modifier with "PE" other than "remote". Perhaps grep for PE, pick off the preceding word, and look for things that might be inconsistent?

We should also make a changelog (or possibly errata) entry for this change and what it was intended to clarify.

[jdinan]

The desired terminology is now "source" PE and "target" PE. Is that right?

[davidozog]

This makes sense to merge into the doc edit branch since it touches everything. :) I will ask that we review this very carefully for escapes, as there are likely instances where we use some other modifier with "PE" other than "remote". Perhaps grep for PE, pick off the preceding word, and look for things that might be inconsistent?

Fortunately the variants of \ac.*{PE} were considered manually in this search/replace scheme (VS code w/ manual review).

Will try the suggested to discover variants of unknown " PE".

The desired terminology is now "source" PE and "target" PE. Is that right?

I would have guessed "initiator PE" but assuming that typo then yes?

[isubsmith]

Does "local PE" match to "target PE"? There were several "local PE {does something} to remote PE" that are now "local PE {does something} to target PE". should we change local to source or initiator as well?

[davidozog]

@wokuno @BKP @maawad - please review, thanks!