Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): update branch #2792

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024
Merged

chore(ci): update branch #2792

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

xiaoyatong
Copy link
Collaborator

@xiaoyatong xiaoyatong commented Nov 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 变更
    • 更新多个工作流配置中的触发分支名称,从 V3.0 更改为 feat_v3.x,影响拉取请求和持续集成的工作流触发条件。
    • 保持工作流结构不变,继续支持代码检查、依赖安装和文档生成等功能。
    • packages/nutui-taro-demo/.gitignore 文件中新增忽略项 src/app.config.ts,该文件将不再被 Git 跟踪。
    • 删除了 packages/nutui-taro-demo/src/app.config.ts 文件,该文件包含了 Taro 应用的配置和路由信息。

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Walkthrough

该拉取请求对多个工作流配置文件进行了修改,主要更新了触发条件中的分支名称,将原先的“V3.0”更改为“feat_v3.x”。这些修改影响了标签分配和持续集成的触发逻辑,但工作流的结构和步骤保持不变。

Changes

文件路径 更改摘要
.github/workflows/add-label.yml 更新标签分配条件,从“V3.0”更改为“feat_v3.x”。
.github/workflows/ci.yml 更新触发工作流的分支名称,从“V3.0”更改为“feat_v3.x”。
.github/workflows/sync-h5.yml 更新触发工作流的分支名称,从“V3.0”更改为“feat_v3.x”。
.github/workflows/sync-migrate.yml 更新触发工作流的分支名称,从“V3.0”更改为“feat_v3.x”。
.github/workflows/sync-taro.yml 更新触发工作流的分支名称,从“V3.0”更改为“feat_v3.x”。
packages/nutui-taro-demo/.gitignore 新增忽略文件src/app.config.ts,不再跟踪该文件。

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • oasis-cloud

🐰 在兔子洞里跳跃,
标签变更真奇妙,
分支名称新气象,
工作流中更流畅。
让我们一起欢呼吧,
兔子们的快乐时光! 🌟

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@xiaoyatong has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8125013 and d124a45.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8125013 and d124a45.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/nutui-taro-demo/src/app.config.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • packages/nutui-taro-demo/src/app.config.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (feat_v3.x@c77e619). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             feat_v3.x    #2792   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage             ?   83.99%           
============================================
  Files                ?      220           
  Lines                ?    17885           
  Branches             ?     2679           
============================================
  Hits                 ?    15023           
  Misses               ?     2857           
  Partials             ?        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/add-label.yml (1)

Line range hint 16-25: 建议添加注释说明标签分配逻辑

为了提高可维护性,建议在条件判断部分添加注释,说明不同分支对应的标签分配逻辑。

      - name: Determine label based on target branch
        id: determine-label
        run: |
          echo "${{github.event_name}}"
+         # 为不同的目标分支分配对应版本标签
+         # next 分支 -> 2.x 标签
          if [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "next" ]]; then
            echo "label=2.x" >> $GITHUB_ENV
+         # feat_v3.x 分支 -> 3.x 标签
          elif [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "feat_v3.x" ]]; then
            echo "label=3.x" >> $GITHUB_ENV
          else
            echo "label=" >> $GITHUB_ENV
          fi
.github/workflows/sync-h5.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-41: 工作流程配置建议

工作流程配置总体看起来不错,但有以下几点建议:

  1. 建议在 pnpm install 步骤添加 --frozen-lockfile 参数,以确保依赖版本的一致性
  2. 考虑为文档生成步骤添加错误处理和超时设置
  3. 建议在 workflow 中添加缓存清理步骤,以防止空间占用过大

建议按如下方式优化配置:

      - name: Install dependencies
-       run: pnpm install
+       run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile

      - name: Generate doc files
+       timeout-minutes: 10
        run: node scripts/copy-docs-h5-or-taro.js || exit 1

+     - name: Cleanup
+       if: always()
+       run: |
+         rm -rf site_docs
.github/workflows/sync-taro.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-41: 建议添加工作流说明注释

建议在工作流文件开头添加注释,说明该工作流的具体用途、触发条件和执行结果,这样可以帮助其他开发者更好地理解和维护。

建议添加如下注释:

+# 该工作流用于将文档同步到 nutui-docs 仓库的 Taro 文档目录
+# 触发条件:当 feat_v3.x 分支的指定文件发生变更时
+# 执行结果:生成并同步文档到 nutui-docs 仓库的 react3x/new-site 分支
 name: sync to docs-taro
.github/workflows/sync-migrate.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-42: 建议优化工作流配置

工作流配置有以下几点可以改进:

  1. 建议为 pnpm install 添加 --frozen-lockfile 参数以确保依赖版本的一致性
  2. 建议为 github-pages-deploy-action 添加 commit-message 参数,以便更好地追踪部署记录
  3. 建议移除多余的空行

建议应用以下修改:

  - name: Install dependencies
-   run: pnpm install
+   run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile

  - name : Sync
    uses : JamesIves/[email protected]
    with :
      branch : react3x/new-site # action 应该部署到的分支 。
      folder : site_docs_migrate #操作应该部署的文件夹 。
      clean: false
      repository-name: jdf2e/nutui-docs
      token: ${{ secrets.GIT_ACTION }}
      target-folder: src/docs
+     commit-message: "chore: sync migration docs from nutui-react"
-
-
-
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d63f42 and f11f11a.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/add-label.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/sync-h5.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/sync-migrate.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/sync-taro.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/add-label.yml (1)

22-22: 分支名称更新已确认

分支名称从 "V3.0" 更新为 "feat_v3.x" 的修改是正确的。让我们验证其他工作流文件中的分支名称是否已同步更新。

✅ Verification successful

分支名称已在所有工作流文件中统一更新

经过验证,所有工作流文件中的分支引用都已正确更新为 feat_v3.x。没有发现任何遗留的 V3.0 引用,所有相关工作流(包括 sync-taro.yml、sync-migrate.yml、sync-h5.yml、ci.yml 和 add-label.yml)都保持一致。

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 描述:验证所有工作流文件中的分支名称更新是否一致

# 检查其他工作流文件中的分支名称引用
rg -g "*.yml" "V3.0" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 39


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 检查所有工作流文件中的分支引用,包括 feat_v3.x 和其他可能的变体
rg -g "*.yml" -i "v3" .github/workflows/

# 列出所有工作流文件以确保我们没有遗漏任何文件
fd -g "*.yml" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 833

.github/workflows/sync-h5.yml (1)

6-6: 请验证分支名称更新的一致性

建议验证所有相关工作流程中的分支名称是否已统一更新为 feat_v3.x,以确保持续集成流程的正常运行。

✅ Verification successful

分支名称已完成统一更新

所有相关工作流程文件中的分支名称已统一更新为 feat_v3.x,包括:

  • sync-taro.yml
  • sync-h5.yml
  • sync-migrate.yml
  • ci.yml
  • add-label.yml 中的条件判断

配置保持一致,无需进行额外更改。

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 检查所有工作流程文件中的分支名称配置
echo "检查工作流程文件中的分支配置..."
rg -l "V3.0|feat_v3.x" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 397


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 检查每个工作流程文件中的具体分支配置
echo "检查 sync-taro.yml 中的分支配置..."
rg "V3.0|feat_v3.x" .github/workflows/sync-taro.yml -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\n检查 sync-h5.yml 中的分支配置..."
rg "V3.0|feat_v3.x" .github/workflows/sync-h5.yml -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\n检查 sync-migrate.yml 中的分支配置..."
rg "V3.0|feat_v3.x" .github/workflows/sync-migrate.yml -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\n检查 ci.yml 中的分支配置..."
rg "V3.0|feat_v3.x" .github/workflows/ci.yml -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\n检查 add-label.yml 中的分支配置..."
rg "V3.0|feat_v3.x" .github/workflows/add-label.yml -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 1258

.github/workflows/sync-taro.yml (1)

6-6: 请确认分支命名策略的一致性

分支名称从 V3.0 更新为 feat_v3.x 的修改看起来没有问题。这个改动与其他工作流配置文件保持一致。

运行以下脚本验证分支命名策略:

✅ Verification successful

分支命名策略已确认且一致

验证结果显示 feat_v3.x 分支配置正确且使用广泛:

  • 该分支已受保护且存在于仓库中
  • 在多个工作流文件中统一使用,包括:
    • sync-taro.yml
    • sync-migrate.yml
    • sync-h5.yml
    • ci.yml
    • add-label.yml

分支命名的更新是合理且一致的。

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 描述:验证仓库中的分支命名约定

# 检查默认分支和保护分支的设置
gh api repos/jdf2e/nutui-react/branches/feat_v3.x

# 检查其他工作流文件中的分支引用
rg -g '*.yml' -g '*.yaml' 'feat_v3.x' .github/workflows/

Length of output: 4135

.github/workflows/sync-migrate.yml (1)

6-6: 分支名称更新已确认

分支名称从 V3.0 更新为 feat_v3.x 的修改看起来没有问题。

运行以下脚本以验证所有工作流配置中的分支名称是否保持一致:

✅ Verification successful

分支名称已统一更新,配置正确

根据检查结果,所有相关工作流文件(sync-migrate.yml、sync-taro.yml、sync-h5.yml、ci.yml)中的分支名称都已统一更新为 feat_v3.x,保持了一致性。工作流配置正确且完整。

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 描述:检查所有工作流文件中的分支名称是否统一

# 搜索所有工作流文件中的分支名称配置
echo "检查工作流文件中的分支名称:"
rg -g "*.yml" "branches:\s*-\s*['\"]?V3.0['\"]?" .github/workflows/
rg -g "*.yml" "branches:\s*-\s*['\"]?feat_v3.x['\"]?" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 346


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 使用更宽松的模式来搜索分支名称
echo "检查工作流文件中的所有分支触发器配置:"
rg -g "*.yml" "on:" -A 5 .github/workflows/

# 显示完整的工作流文件内容以便分析
echo -e "\n完整的工作流文件内容:"
cat .github/workflows/sync-migrate.yml

Length of output: 9887

.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)

7-7: 分支命名更新符合最佳实践

将分支名从 V3.0 更改为 feat_v3.x 更好地反映了其作为特性分支的性质,并提供了更灵活的版本范围。


7-7: 验证工作流配置的一致性

需要确保所有相关的工作流配置文件都已更新了相应的分支名称。

✅ Verification successful

分支配置已正确同步

根据检查结果,工作流配置中的分支引用是一致的:

  • feat_v3.x 分支仅在 PR 标签自动化工作流中使用
  • 其他工作流使用了 next 分支和 react3x/new-site 分支
  • 没有发现过时或不一致的分支引用
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 描述:检查其他工作流文件中的分支名称配置

# 检查所有工作流文件中的分支名称
echo "检查工作流文件中的分支配置..."
rg -l "V3.0" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 218


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 检查所有工作流文件中的分支相关配置
echo "工作流文件列表:"
fd . .github/workflows/

echo -e "\n分支相关配置:"
rg -i "branch|ref" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 1328

@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/L and removed size/S labels Nov 22, 2024
@Alex-huxiyang Alex-huxiyang merged commit 9332996 into jdf2e:feat_v3.x Nov 22, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants