Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixup of #64 - region and STS support #78

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Oct 2, 2015
Merged

Fixup of #64 - region and STS support #78

merged 34 commits into from
Oct 2, 2015

Conversation

jantman
Copy link
Owner

@jantman jantman commented Oct 2, 2015

This is a slightly reworked and fixed-up version of #64

philchristensen and others added 30 commits September 29, 2015 21:06
…f service classes"

This reverts commit 47a0602.

This refactor didn't work out. When we set
self.connect_function = boto.something.some_function
it becomes a bound method of ``self``, apparently. The end result
is that ``self`` ALWAYS gets passed in as the first argument, and there's
really no way around this. The only alternative would be to set connect_function
to a string, the name of the function to call, but then testing becomes
horrible and it also won't support functions *or* classes.
…tedAdvisor doesn't have to be a subclass of _AwsService
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 100.00%

Merging #78 into develop will not affect coverage as of b415e9e

@@            develop     #78   diff @@
=======================================
  Files            16      17     +1
  Stmts          1170    1229    +59
  Branches        175     184     +9
  Methods           0       0       
=======================================
+ Hit            1170    1229    +59
  Partial           0       0       
  Missed            0       0       

Review entire Coverage Diff as of b415e9e

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

jantman added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2015
Fixup of #64 - region and STS support
@jantman jantman merged commit 6da2944 into develop Oct 2, 2015
@jantman jantman deleted the pr64 branch October 2, 2015 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants