You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Cortex CLI does not use the API Server in all commands
Feature Idea
Cortex CLI should be a layer on top of the API Server.
This is quite straight forward except for cortex pull and cortex engines install.
We use libcurl UI/UX for download progress for above CLI commands and get the models, engines directly from Github, HF, ... The execution via /v1/models/pull and /v1/engines/install requires a lot of changes in UI/UX and logic (will need websockets to track download progress).
Related ticket: #1423
For cortex pull and cortex engines install using API server, can we move them into v1.0.2 instead of v1.0.1?
dan-menlo
changed the title
idea: Cortex CLI should be a layer on top of the API Server
planning: Cortex CLI should be a layer on top of the API Server
Oct 21, 2024
Sub-ticket from Epic: #1415
Problem Statement
Cortex CLI does not use the API Server in all commands
Feature Idea
Cortex CLI should be a layer on top of the API Server.
This is quite straight forward except for
cortex pull
andcortex engines install
.We use
libcurl
UI/UX for download progress for above CLI commands and get the models, engines directly from Github, HF, ... The execution via/v1/models/pull
and/v1/engines/install
requires a lot of changes in UI/UX and logic (will needwebsockets
to track download progress).Related ticket: #1423
For
cortex pull
andcortex engines install
using API server, can we move them into v1.0.2 instead of v1.0.1?cc: @dan-homebrew @0xSage @gabrielle-ong @namchuai @nguyenhoangthuan99
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: