Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fast-track: TCK documentation and dependency update for 4.0 #1249

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 1, 2024

Conversation

alwin-joseph
Copy link
Contributor

@alwin-joseph alwin-joseph commented Mar 29, 2024

In jaxrs-tck/docs/

  • New file JAXRSTCK4.0-ReleaseNotes.html replacing JAXRSTCK3.1-ReleaseNotes.html with basic changes including version.

  • Created new Spec Assertions file JAXRSSpecAssertions_4.0.0.html/xml that has the recent update made to JAXRS:SPEC:131 via fast-track: Clarify the JavaSE support in Jakarta Rest Specification #1231. Retained JAXRSSpecAssertions_3.1.0.html/xml with contents from release 3.1. Any further update to the spec assertions for release 4.0 can go in JAXRSSpecAssertions_4.0.0.html/xml.

  • index.html and userguide config file jaxrs-tck/docs/userguide/src/main/jbake/content/attributes.conf updated with basic version updates.

  • Update jaxrs-tck/pom,xml with latest versions of dependencies.

cc @jim-krueger @spericas @jansupol @jamezp

@alwin-joseph alwin-joseph changed the title fast-track: TCK documentation update for 4.0 fast-track: TCK documentation and dependency update for 4.0 Mar 29, 2024
@spericas spericas added this to the 4.0 milestone Apr 1, 2024
@spericas spericas merged commit ec8a7bd into jakartaee:main Apr 1, 2024
3 checks passed
<!-- JAXRS 3.1-->
<assertion required="true" impl-spec="false" defined-by="technology" status="active" testable="true">
<id>JAXRS:SPEC:131</id>
<description>There are two alternative ways of publishing on Java SE: Creating SE endpoints directly or using the SE bootstrap API. Any compliant implementation that supports either of these alternatives on Java SE MUST support both.</description>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was reworded for 3.1, but not for 4.0

Copy link
Contributor

@jim-krueger jim-krueger Apr 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jansupol Actually PR 1231 changes this wording for 4.0 (main). What is here is correct for 4.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants