feat: automatically publish readme to docker hub

[inosmeet]

Which problem is this PR solving?

Fixes: #3842

Description of the changes

• Added a shell script that publishes README.md files along with docker images to docker hub

How was this change tested?

• Locally as well as on fork

Checklist

• I have read https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
• I have signed all commits
• I have added unit tests for the new functionality
• I have run lint and test steps successfully
  • for jaeger: make lint test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.42%. Comparing base (f5575e2) to head (1acbedd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6118   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.42%   96.42%           
=======================================
  Files         353      353           
  Lines       20112    20112           
=======================================
  Hits        19394    19394           
  Misses        533      533           
  Partials      185      185           

Flag	Coverage Δ
badger_v1	8.34% <ø> (ø)
badger_v2	1.69% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v1	14.43% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2	1.63% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v1	14.43% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2	1.63% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-6.x-v1	18.55% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-7.x-v1	18.63% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v1	18.80% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v2	1.68% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
grpc_v1	9.37% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
grpc_v2	7.03% <ø> (ø)
kafka-v1	8.91% <ø> (ø)
kafka-v2	1.69% <ø> (ø)
memory_v2	1.69% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-1.x-v1	18.67% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
opensearch-2.x-v1	18.67% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v2	1.68% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
tailsampling-processor	0.48% <ø> (ø)
unittests	95.34% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[inosmeet]

[inosmeet]

As for the quay.io - I wanted to get satisfactory result with the docker to get started with this PR, I'll look into it now.

Unrelated to this PR -
These recurring lint failures makes me wonder if we should have a pre-commit configured for the repo?
what do you think? @yurishkuro

[inosmeet]

for quay.io:

[inosmeet]

CIT OpenSearch / opoensearch 2.x v2 passes on a retry