-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 344
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change Operator provider to CNCF #263
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #263 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.81% 89.81%
=======================================
Files 64 64
Lines 3014 3014
=======================================
Hits 2707 2707
Misses 207 207
Partials 100 100 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved
Just waiting for @awgreene's OK to merge this. |
@awgreene Is it ok to change the provider? and if so, is this PR ok or is anything else required? |
If CNFF is the provider please feel free to update the field. Best practice is to create a new csv vand add the |
Signed-off-by: Gary Brown <[email protected]>
…ically updated on release Signed-off-by: Gary Brown <[email protected]>
@jpkrohling I've updated the release.sh based on @awgreene 's comment about specifying the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just need a clarification about the replaces
Change provider from
Jaeger
toCNCF
to enable it to be listed with other CNCF project operators.@awgreene Would you be able to review and confirm this an appropriate change to update the provider used on operatorhub.io? If so, how does the update get applied to the hub?
Signed-off-by: Gary Brown [email protected]