-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 344
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expose admin ports for agent, collector, and query Deployments via the equivalent Service #2204
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2204 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 87.63% 87.54% -0.09%
==========================================
Files 100 100
Lines 6956 6930 -26
==========================================
- Hits 6096 6067 -29
- Misses 656 658 +2
- Partials 204 205 +1
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
oh it seems some basic tests are still failing |
@thomaspaulin could you take a look to the failing tests? |
@iblancasa Sure thing, I'll take a look at the tests. |
seems there is still something wrong here: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/actions/runs/5410048296/jobs/9830973296#step:6:1541 |
pkg/service/query_test.go
Outdated
assert.Equal(t, int32(32767), svc.Spec.Ports[0].NodePort) // make sure we get the same NodePort as set above | ||
assert.Equal(t, intstr.FromInt(16686), svc.Spec.Ports[0].TargetPort) | ||
assert.Equal(t, intstr.FromInt(16687), svc.Spec.Ports[1].TargetPort) | ||
assert.Equal(t, intstr.FromInt(16687), svc.Spec.Ports[2].TargetPort) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahh here, its both 16687
Pull request was closed
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: frzifus, thomaspaulin The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
mh... @thomaspaulin I pushed to your branch and now then it was closed? And i also can not see the changes on your main branch https://github.com/thomaspaulin/jaeger-operator/tree/main - that's weird |
@frzifus how odd, thanks for creating a new PR with the fixes! |
Which problem is this PR solving?
Resolves #2203
Short description of the changes
/metrics
endpoint on that port and therefore monitoring of Jaeger itself.