-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 344
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable single operator to monitor all namespaces #188
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bf0c796
Enable single operator to monitor all namespaces
objectiser 2201049
Update to use observability namespace by default
objectiser f061f86
Namespace not required in crd
objectiser a89f76c
Ran the operator-sdk olm-catalog gen-csv --csv-version 1.9.0 command
objectiser File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,11 +1,13 @@ | ||
kind: RoleBinding | ||
kind: ClusterRoleBinding | ||
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 | ||
metadata: | ||
name: jaeger-operator | ||
namespace: observability | ||
subjects: | ||
- kind: ServiceAccount | ||
name: jaeger-operator | ||
namespace: observability | ||
roleRef: | ||
kind: Role | ||
kind: ClusterRole | ||
name: jaeger-operator | ||
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ apiVersion: v1 | |
kind: ServiceAccount | ||
metadata: | ||
name: jaeger-operator | ||
namespace: observability |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jpkrohling I ran the command as described here - just wondering if the removal of the
--platform=openshift
is right?cc @awgreene
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't look correct. OLM is, AFAIK, OpenShift-specific, so, it requires the
--platform=openshift
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't think OLM is supposed to be OpenShift specific - question is why it automatically removes this arg, but leaves the
start
argument? Maybe it is just using theoperator.yaml
.Might be worth addressing this by checking for
Route
or other OpenShift specific resource to determine platform, to avoid separate deploy file?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @jpkrohling and @objectiser
OLM and Marketplace will be able to run on vanilla Kubernetes. The Operator-sdk gen will use the
operator.yaml
by default. Ideally, there would be a single deployment file calledoperator.yaml
and checks for the platform would be done within the running operator.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@awgreene Ok thanks.
@jpkrohling So should we just merge this PR and work on detecting the platform automatically in a separate PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, LGTM