You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The network changes are not only on the version of the API (networking.k8s.io/v1beta1 => networking.k8s.io/v1), the Ingress definition also changed a little bit (https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/deprecation-guide/#ingress-v122) , if we want to use the new version (to be compatible with 1.22) we need those changes.
In order to be compatible with both old/new APIs we need to do extra work.
The network changes are not only on the version of the API (networking.k8s.io/v1beta1 => networking.k8s.io/v1), the Ingress definition also changed a little bit (https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/deprecation-guide/#ingress-v122) , if we want to use the new version (to be compatible with 1.22) we need those changes.
In order to be compatible with both old/new APIs we need to do extra work.
I will try to investigate the possibilities and cost to keep the backward compatibility.
Requirement - what kind of business use case are you trying to solve?
Support Kubernetes v1.16.
It is normally not an easy task to upgrade Kubernetes cluster.
Problem - what in Jaeger blocks you from solving the requirement?
In the latest release, I noticed that we have to use Kubernetes > 1.19 as mentioned in #1456 .
Proposal - what do you suggest to solve the problem or improve the existing situation?
Is that still possible to support legacy versions?
Any open questions to address
It seems the
apiextensions.k8s.io/v1beta1
crd is supported from v1.16 from the documentSo the breaking change is caused by
networking.k8s.io/v1
API usage?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: