RFC corrections suggested by DAL WG

[gmantele]

Here are some corrections suggested by the DAL WG:

• add section about comments in query
• add a paragraph explaining how to escape a single quote in a string literal
• reword intro of the section "Datatype functions" (about geometry constructors)
• fix ADQL versions not allowing differing COOSYS arguments in the section "Coordinate System"
• add explicit recommendation to use the EN for the Catalogue of UDF

[msdemlei]

Just a brief nitpick for the language lawyers. From my PoV, feel free to merge in whatever form (including a force-merge in case this review goes stale).

Thanks!

[msdemlei]

"anywhere in the query" is too strong a statement; in the SQL92 grammar, there's the separator nonterminal that we've (rightly) thrown out, so we can't refer to that. What about "A comment is syntactically legal wherever whitespace is legal (and can then stand in for that whitespace)"?

[jd-au]

Thanks for addressing those.

[gmantele]

No new comment for 2 weeks, I assume I can merge now. Thanks to all of you for your inputs :-)

[Bonnarel]

Le 31/10/2023 à 14:14, Grégory Mantelet a écrit :

No new comment for 2 weeks, I assume I can merge now. Thanks to all of you for your inputs :-) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#100 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMP5LTC4DZ3O2QW577SZZRDYCD2U5AVCNFSM6AAAAAA54CE6MKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTOOBXGE4TMNZZGM>. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

Thanks to all. I expect loading a firts version of the Implementation note by the beginning of interop