-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Analyze midsagittal lesion length and width #96
Merged
valosekj
merged 28 commits into
main
from
jv/ismrm_2025-midsagittal_lesion_length_and_width
Jan 18, 2025
Merged
Analyze midsagittal lesion length and width #96
valosekj
merged 28 commits into
main
from
jv/ismrm_2025-midsagittal_lesion_length_and_width
Jan 18, 2025
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… compute the midsagittal lesion length and width.
… we use '-ofolder' for sct_analyze_lesion, then QC report fails.
…e previous commit
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
… metal artifacts See comments in the following PR for context: #96
As the C-A model does not perform well on lumbar images with metal artifacts, I dropped it in 3a88281. The further analysis will continue with the SCIsegV2 model only. For context, see the hidden comments above and sct-pipeline/contrast-agnostic-softseg-spinalcord#118. |
…ecause if SCIseg predictions no lesion, it finished with a QC error and GT masks are not analyzed at all
… Bland-Altman plots
'width_midsagittal_slice' --> 'width_interpolated_midsagittal_slice'
Self-reviewed --> merging to be able to create a new release related to the ISMRM 2025 submission |
valosekj
deleted the
jv/ismrm_2025-midsagittal_lesion_length_and_width
branch
January 18, 2025 18:01
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a codebase to compare the midsagittal lesion length and width computed using different methods (GT vs SCIsegV2; master vs PR4656).
For details, visit this README.
Related SCT branch: spinalcordtoolbox/spinalcordtoolbox#4656