feat(payments): Bootstrap webapp and microservice #16745
Conversation
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (82)
apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/dtos/createPaymentFlow.dto.ts (1)
3-6:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation and improve documentation for the payment flow DTO.
The DTO lacks essential validation and documentation which is crucial for a payment-related service.
Apply these improvements:
+import { IsUrl, IsNotEmpty, MaxLength } from 'class-validator' import { ApiProperty } from '@nestjs/swagger' +/** + * DTO for creating a new payment flow + * Contains the URL where the payment flow will be initiated + */ export class CreatePaymentFlowDTO { - @ApiProperty() - url!: string + @ApiProperty({ + description: 'The URL where the payment flow will be initiated', + example: 'https://example.com/payment', + }) + @IsUrl({ require_tld: true, require_protocol: true }) + @IsNotEmpty() + @MaxLength(2048) + url: string }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import { IsUrl, IsNotEmpty, MaxLength } from 'class-validator' import { ApiProperty } from '@nestjs/swagger' /** * DTO for creating a new payment flow * Contains the URL where the payment flow will be initiated */ export class CreatePaymentFlowDTO { @ApiProperty({ description: 'The URL where the payment flow will be initiated', example: 'https://example.com/payment', }) @IsUrl({ require_tld: true, require_protocol: true }) @IsNotEmpty() @MaxLength(2048) url: string }apps/payments/environments/environment.ts (2)
1-7: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add TypeScript interfaces and essential configuration properties.
The configuration objects lack type safety and essential properties typically needed for a payments application.
Consider implementing this structure:
interface Environment { production: boolean; api: { baseUrl: string; timeout: number; }; payments: { merchantId: string; apiKey: string; webhookSecret: string; }; } const devConfig: Environment = { production: false, api: { baseUrl: 'http://localhost:3000', timeout: 30000, }, payments: { merchantId: process.env.DEV_MERCHANT_ID ?? '', apiKey: process.env.DEV_API_KEY ?? '', webhookSecret: process.env.DEV_WEBHOOK_SECRET ?? '', }, }; const prodConfig: Environment = { production: true, api: { baseUrl: process.env.API_BASE_URL ?? '', timeout: 30000, }, payments: { merchantId: process.env.PROD_MERCHANT_ID ?? '', apiKey: process.env.PROD_API_KEY ?? '', webhookSecret: process.env.PROD_WEBHOOK_SECRET ?? '', }, };
9-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add environment validation and error handling.
The current environment selection logic lacks validation and error handling for invalid NODE_ENV values.
Consider implementing this approach:
function validateEnvironment(env: string | undefined): env is 'development' | 'production' { return env === 'development' || env === 'production'; } const currentEnv = process.env.NODE_ENV; if (!validateEnvironment(currentEnv)) { throw new Error(`Invalid NODE_ENV: ${currentEnv}`); } export default currentEnv === 'production' ? prodConfig : devConfig;apps/payments/specs/index.spec.tsx (3)
6-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test coverage with comprehensive test scenarios.
The current test only verifies that the component renders without crashing. For a payment-related page, we need more thorough testing:
- Test form interactions and submissions
- Verify payment flow states
- Test error scenarios
- Include accessibility testing
describe('Page', () => { + beforeEach(() => { + // Setup any necessary mocks or test data + }); + it('should render successfully', () => { - const { baseElement } = render(<Page />) - expect(baseElement).toBeTruthy() + render(<Page />) + expect(screen.getByRole('main')).toBeInTheDocument() }) + + it('should handle form submission correctly', async () => { + const user = userEvent.setup() + render(<Page />) + + // Add tests for form interactions + }) + + it('should display appropriate error messages', async () => { + render(<Page />) + // Add tests for error scenarios + }) + + it('should be accessible', async () => { + const { container } = render(<Page />) + expect(await axe(container)).toHaveNoViolations() + }) })Consider adding the
jest-axelibrary for accessibility testing:import { axe } from 'jest-axe'
1-4: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add missing testing utilities.
Consider importing additional testing utilities to enable more comprehensive testing:
import React from 'react' -import { render } from '@testing-library/react' +import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react' +import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event' +import '@testing-library/jest-dom'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import React from 'react' import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react' import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event' import '@testing-library/jest-dom' import Page from '../app/page'
4-4: 💡 Codebase verification
Invalid import path detected - Page component not found in specified location
The import path
../app/pageis incorrect as:
- The repository structure shows this is not using the Next.js app directory structure
- The project follows a pages directory pattern (
apps/payments/pages/)- The
appdirectory does not exist in the project structure- The referenced Page component file is not found in the specified location
Please update the import path to point to the correct location of the Page component.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the Page component's path.
The import path suggests this is a Next.js app directory structure. Ensure the Page component is properly exported from the app directory.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the Page component's export and structure ast-grep --pattern 'export default function Page() { $$$ }'Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first check if the Page component exists in the app directory fd "page.tsx?" apps/payments/app # Then let's check the content of any found files fd "page.tsx?" apps/payments/app -x cat {} # Also check the content of the spec file to understand the usage cat apps/payments/specs/index.spec.tsxLength of output: 597
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the directory structure to understand the correct paths fd . apps/payments --type d # Also check if the page file exists in any location under payments fd "page.tsx?" apps/paymentsLength of output: 528
apps/services/payments/tsconfig.json (1)
13-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add essential compiler options for NestJS development.
While
esModuleInteropis useful, the configuration is missing several important compiler options that are recommended for NestJS applications.Apply this diff to add the essential compiler options:
"compilerOptions": { - "esModuleInterop": true + "esModuleInterop": true, + "strict": true, + "emitDecoratorMetadata": true, + "experimentalDecorators": true, + "sourceMap": true, + "outDir": "./dist", + "baseUrl": "./", + "incremental": true }These options will:
- Enable strict type checking
- Support NestJS decorators
- Enable source maps for debugging
- Configure output directory
- Enable incremental builds for better performance
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements."compilerOptions": { "esModuleInterop": true, "strict": true, "emitDecoratorMetadata": true, "experimentalDecorators": true, "sourceMap": true, "outDir": "./dist", "baseUrl": "./", "incremental": true }apps/payments/server.ts (2)
8-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add type safety and error handling for external dependencies.
The external dependencies configuration could benefit from improved type safety and error handling.
Consider applying these improvements:
- externalEndpointDependencies: (nextConfig) => { + externalEndpointDependencies: (nextConfig: { serverRuntimeConfig: { graphqlEndpoint: string; apiUrl: string } }) => { + if (!nextConfig?.serverRuntimeConfig?.graphqlEndpoint || !nextConfig?.serverRuntimeConfig?.apiUrl) { + throw new Error('Missing required server runtime configuration: graphqlEndpoint or apiUrl'); + } const { graphqlEndpoint, apiUrl } = nextConfig.serverRuntimeConfig - return [graphqlEndpoint, apiUrl] + return [graphqlEndpoint, apiUrl] as const },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.externalEndpointDependencies: (nextConfig: { serverRuntimeConfig: { graphqlEndpoint: string; apiUrl: string } }) => { if (!nextConfig?.serverRuntimeConfig?.graphqlEndpoint || !nextConfig?.serverRuntimeConfig?.apiUrl) { throw new Error('Missing required server runtime configuration: graphqlEndpoint or apiUrl'); } const { graphqlEndpoint, apiUrl } = nextConfig.serverRuntimeConfig return [graphqlEndpoint, apiUrl] as const },
8-11: 💡 Codebase verification
Configuration mismatch in server runtime dependencies
The
apiUrlis not defined in theserverRuntimeConfigbut is being destructured from it inserver.ts. This will result inundefinedbeing returned as one of the external endpoint dependencies.
- In
apps/payments/server.ts:apiUrlis being destructured fromserverRuntimeConfig- In
apps/payments/next.config.js: OnlygraphqlEndpointis defined inserverRuntimeConfig,apiUrlis missing🔗 Analysis chain
Verify Next.js configuration for external dependencies.
The code expects
graphqlEndpointandapiUrlin the server runtime config. Let's verify these are properly configured.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check Next.js configuration files for required runtime config # Look for next.config files echo "Searching for Next.js configuration files..." fd -t f "next.config" apps/payments # Check for serverRuntimeConfig definitions echo "Checking for runtime configuration..." rg -l "serverRuntimeConfig.*graphqlEndpoint|serverRuntimeConfig.*apiUrl" apps/paymentsLength of output: 337
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of the next.config.js file echo "Content of next.config.js:" cat apps/payments/next.config.js # Also search for any references to these config values echo -e "\nReferences to config values:" rg "graphqlEndpoint|apiUrl" apps/paymentsLength of output: 1891
apps/services/payments/test/globalSetup.ts (2)
8-10: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling for database startup.
The current implementation doesn't handle potential database startup failures. Since this is a critical setup step for tests, we should add proper error handling and logging.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
export default async () => { - await startPostgres() + try { + await startPostgres() + console.log('Test database started successfully') + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to start test database:', error) + throw error + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default async () => { try { await startPostgres() console.log('Test database started successfully') } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to start test database:', error) throw error } }
3-5:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid path traversal in require statement.
The current implementation uses string concatenation to construct the path to the extended tsconfig, which could potentially lead to path traversal issues. Consider using
path.resolve()for safer path handling.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-const tsConfig = require(`../${require('../tsconfig.json').extends}`) +import * as path from 'path' +const tsConfigPath = path.resolve(__dirname, '..', require('../tsconfig.json').extends) +const tsConfig = require(tsConfigPath)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import * as path from 'path' const tsConfigPath = path.resolve(__dirname, '..', require('../tsconfig.json').extends) const tsConfig = require(tsConfigPath) register({ baseUrl: './', paths: tsConfig.compilerOptions.paths })libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.module.ts (1)
1-11: 💡 Codebase verification
Missing test coverage for critical payment functionality
The payment module lacks essential test coverage:
- No test files (*.spec.ts) found in the module directory
- No test cases for payment flow validation
- No error handling tests for API interactions
- Jest configuration exists but no actual tests implemented
Critical areas requiring test coverage:
- PaymentsService.getPaymentFlow() method
- Payment flow input validation
- API error handling scenarios
- Authentication guard behavior
🔗 Analysis chain
Ensure proper testing setup
As this is a critical payment module, we should verify that comprehensive testing is in place.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for test coverage in payments module # Look for test files fd -e spec.ts -e test.ts . libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/ # Check for payment-related test cases rg -l "describe.*Payment" libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/Length of output: 293
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a more comprehensive search for test files and testing patterns # Search for test files in the payments module with better context fd -t f . libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/ | rg "(spec|test)\.ts$" # Look for testing-related code patterns rg -A 3 "describe|it\(|expect|mock" libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/ # Check if there are any test setup files fd -t f . libs/api/domains/payments/ | rg "jest|test" # Look for mocks or test utilities fd -t f . libs/api/domains/payments/ | rg "mock|fake|stub|test-utils" # Check service implementation for error handling rg -A 3 "try|catch|throw|error" libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.service.ts # Look at the resolver implementation for potential test cases cat libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.resolver.tsLength of output: 1195
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the service implementation and payment flow DTOs # Check the service implementation cat libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.service.ts # Look at the DTO implementations cat libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/dto/getPaymentFlow.input.ts cat libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/dto/getPaymentFlow.response.ts # Check jest config content cat libs/api/domains/payments/jest.config.ts # Look for any test coverage configuration rg -l "coverageThreshold|collectCoverage" libs/api/domains/payments/Length of output: 2369
apps/services/payments/src/types/payment.ts (1)
3-15: 💡 Codebase verification
URL callbacks require validation implementation for security
The codebase lacks URL validation for payment callback URLs. While there's a
validateUrlutility in the auth-admin-web module, it's not being used in the payment flow. This poses potential security risks like open redirects.
- Add URL validation in
apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.service.tsforonSuccessUrl,onUpdateUrl, andonErrorUrl- Consider implementing URL allowlisting for approved callback domains
- Reuse or adapt the existing URL validation utility from
auth-admin-web/utils/validation.utils.ts🔗 Analysis chain
Verify URL callback security measures.
The use of callback URLs requires careful handling to prevent security issues like open redirects.
Let me gather more specific information about URL validation in the payment context.
Let me check one more aspect specifically for URL validation implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for URL validation and security measures in the codebase # Test 1: Check for URL validation utilities echo "Checking for URL validation utilities..." rg -l "validateUrl|isValidUrl|URL validation" --type ts # Test 2: Check for security middleware or guards echo "Checking for security middleware handling URLs..." ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements CanActivate { $$$ validate$_Url($_) { $$$ } }'Length of output: 545
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for URL validation in payment-related files echo "Checking URL validation in payment context..." rg -A 5 "onSuccessUrl|onUpdateUrl|onErrorUrl" --type ts # Check for URL sanitization or validation in payment service echo "Checking URL handling in payment service..." rg -A 5 "createPayment|processPayment|handlePayment" --type ts # Look for URL-related security measures echo "Checking URL security measures..." rg -A 5 "(validateUrl|sanitizeUrl|isValidUrl).*(Success|Error|Update)" --type tsLength of output: 19306
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for URL validation in the auth-admin-web utils since we found a reference earlier echo "Checking URL validation implementation..." rg -A 10 "validateUrl|isValidUrl" apps/auth-admin-web/utils/validation.utils.ts # Check for any URL validation middleware echo "Checking for URL validation middleware..." rg -A 5 "validateUrl|isValidUrl" --type ts apps/services/payments/src/app/middleware/Length of output: 749
libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.service.ts (2)
3-3: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unused Auth-related imports.
The Auth-related imports (
Auth,AuthMiddleware,User) are not utilized in the current implementation. Remove them to maintain clean code and ensure effective tree-shaking.-import { Auth, AuthMiddleware, User } from '@island.is/auth-nest-tools'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
12-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and input validation.
The current implementation directly forwards the call to the API without:
- Error handling for failed API calls
- Input validation beyond TypeScript types
- Business logic layer that might be needed in the future
Consider implementing this more robust version:
- getPaymentFlow(input: GetPaymentFlowInput): Promise<GetPaymentFlowDTO> { - return this.paymentsApi.paymentFlowControllerGetPaymentInfo(input) - } + async getPaymentFlow(input: GetPaymentFlowInput): Promise<GetPaymentFlowDTO> { + try { + // Add any business logic/validation here + const result = await this.paymentsApi.paymentFlowControllerGetPaymentInfo(input) + return result + } catch (error) { + // Log the error for monitoring + throw new Error(`Failed to get payment flow: ${error.message}`) + } + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async getPaymentFlow(input: GetPaymentFlowInput): Promise<GetPaymentFlowDTO> { try { // Add any business logic/validation here const result = await this.paymentsApi.paymentFlowControllerGetPaymentInfo(input) return result } catch (error) { // Log the error for monitoring throw new Error(`Failed to get payment flow: ${error.message}`) } }apps/services/payments/sequelize.config.js (4)
12-15:
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent environment variable naming in production config
The production environment variables don't follow the same naming pattern as development (missing '_PAYMENTS' suffix). This could lead to conflicts with other services.
- username: process.env.DB_USER, - password: process.env.DB_PASS, - database: process.env.DB_NAME, - host: process.env.DB_HOST, + username: process.env.DB_USER_PAYMENTS, + password: process.env.DB_PASS_PAYMENTS, + database: process.env.DB_NAME_PAYMENTS, + host: process.env.DB_HOST_PAYMENTS,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.username: process.env.DB_USER_PAYMENTS, password: process.env.DB_PASS_PAYMENTS, database: process.env.DB_NAME_PAYMENTS, host: process.env.DB_HOST_PAYMENTS,
4-6:
⚠️ Potential issueSecurity: Avoid using predictable default credentials in development
Using 'dev_db' as default credentials could pose a security risk if accidentally deployed. Consider using more complex default values or requiring explicit environment variables.
- username: process.env.DB_USER_PAYMENTS ?? 'dev_db', - password: process.env.DB_PASS_PAYMENTS ?? 'dev_db', - database: process.env.DB_NAME_PAYMENTS ?? 'dev_db', + username: process.env.DB_USER_PAYMENTS ?? 'payments_dev_user', + password: process.env.DB_PASS_PAYMENTS ?? process.env.LOCAL_DEV_DB_PASSWORD, + database: process.env.DB_NAME_PAYMENTS ?? 'payments_development',Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
11-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add essential database configuration options for production
The production configuration is missing important settings for security and performance:
- SSL/TLS configuration
- Connection pool settings
- Timezone configuration
- Logging configuration
production: { username: process.env.DB_USER, password: process.env.DB_PASS, database: process.env.DB_NAME, host: process.env.DB_HOST, dialect: 'postgres', + dialectOptions: { + ssl: { + require: true, + rejectUnauthorized: true + } + }, + pool: { + max: 20, + min: 0, + acquire: 30000, + idle: 10000 + }, + timezone: '+00:00', + logging: false },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.production: { username: process.env.DB_USER, password: process.env.DB_PASS, database: process.env.DB_NAME, host: process.env.DB_HOST, dialect: 'postgres', dialectOptions: { ssl: { require: true, rejectUnauthorized: true } }, pool: { max: 20, min: 0, acquire: 30000, idle: 10000 }, timezone: '+00:00', logging: false },
1-18: 💡 Codebase verification
Environment variables need validation at startup
Based on the code analysis, there is no explicit validation of required environment variables in the application startup code. The database configuration relies on environment variables in production mode, but there's no validation to ensure they are present and valid. This could lead to runtime errors if the configuration is incomplete.
- Add validation for
DB_USER,DB_PASS,DB_NAME, andDB_HOSTin production environment- Consider using a configuration validation library like
class-validatorwith a config DTO- Implement validation in
SequelizeConfigServiceor create a dedicated configuration service🔗 Analysis chain
Verify environment variable validation
Ensure that the application validates required environment variables at startup to fail fast if configuration is incomplete.
Let me check the content of these files to verify if proper environment variable validation is implemented.
Let me check if there are any environment validation utilities in the main application file or any configuration validation classes.
Let me check the bootstrap function and the imported utilities to see if there's any environment validation happening at the infrastructure level.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if environment variables are validated in the application startup code # Look for environment variable validation in NestJS configuration or main files rg -l "ConfigService|validateSync|IsString|IsNotEmpty" "apps/services/payments/" # Check for environment validation utilities ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ { $$$ validate() { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 258
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of the identified files cat apps/services/payments/src/app/sequelizeConfig.service.ts cat apps/services/payments/src/app/app.module.ts # Look for validation decorators and environment variable validation rg "IsString|IsNotEmpty|@IsOptional|@ValidateIf" apps/services/payments/src/Length of output: 1602
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check main.ts and any config validation files cat apps/services/payments/src/main.ts # Look for environment validation patterns rg -A 5 "process\.env\." apps/services/payments/src/Length of output: 879
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the bootstrap implementation rg -A 10 "function bootstrap" --type typescript # Check the infra-nest-server package usage fd -e ts -e js "infra-nest-server" --exec cat {}Length of output: 135
apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.service.spec.ts (5)
16-20:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance test coverage for payment flows
The current test suite only covers a simple
getDatamethod, which seems to be a placeholder. For a payment service, we need comprehensive testing of actual payment flow operations.Consider adding tests for:
- Payment creation/initialization
- Payment status updates
- Error scenarios (invalid inputs, failed payments)
- Payment validation
- Integration with external payment providers
Would you like me to provide a template for these test cases?
9-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add required dependencies and mocks
The test module setup is too simple for a payment service. It's missing essential dependencies that would be required for a real payment flow implementation.
Consider adding:
const mockRepository = { create: jest.fn(), findOne: jest.fn(), update: jest.fn() }; const mockExternalPaymentProvider = { initializePayment: jest.fn(), validatePayment: jest.fn() }; const module = await Test.createTestingModule({ providers: [ PaymentFlowService, { provide: getRepositoryToken(PaymentFlow), useValue: mockRepository }, { provide: ExternalPaymentProvider, useValue: mockExternalPaymentProvider } ] }).compile();
3-3:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect import path
The import path './app.service' doesn't match the expected file structure. It should be importing from './paymentFlow.service' based on the file naming convention.
-import { PaymentFlowService } from './app.service' +import { PaymentFlowService } from './paymentFlow.service'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import { PaymentFlowService } from './paymentFlow.service'
8-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve test setup practices
The current setup has several potential issues:
- Using
beforeAllcould lead to state sharing between tests- Missing cleanup after tests
- No error handling for module compilation
Consider this improved setup:
- beforeAll(async () => { + beforeEach(async () => { const app = await Test.createTestingModule({ providers: [PaymentFlowService], }).compile() service = app.get<PaymentFlowService>(PaymentFlowService) }) + + afterEach(async () => { + jest.clearAllMocks() + })Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
1-21: 💡 Codebase verification
Test file has incorrect import path and outdated test cases
- The import path
./app.serviceis incorrect and should be./paymentFlow.service- The test is checking for a non-existent
getData()method while the service actually implementscreatePaymentUrl()andgetPaymentInfo()- The test is missing required dependencies:
@island.is/loggingand Sequelize model- No test coverage for the actual service methods
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify test file location and integration
The test file structure suggests this is part of a NestJS microservice. Let's verify the integration with the payment flow module.
Let me check the service implementation to verify if the test file correctly matches the service being tested.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the test file structure and related payment flow files # Check for the corresponding service file echo "Checking for PaymentFlow service file..." fd "paymentFlow.service.ts" apps/services/payments/src # Check for the module definition echo "Checking for PaymentFlow module..." fd "paymentFlow.module.ts" apps/services/payments/src # Check for related payment flow files echo "Checking for other payment flow related files..." fd "paymentFlow" apps/services/payments/srcLength of output: 1020
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the service implementation cat apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.service.ts # Check if the import path in the test file is correct cat apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.service.spec.tsLength of output: 2706
apps/payments/.eslintrc.json (1)
8-8:
⚠️ Potential issueReview the ignore patterns configuration.
The current ignore pattern
["!**/*", ".next/**/*"]appears to ignore all files except those in the.nextdirectory. This is likely incorrect as it would prevent linting of source files. The.nextdirectory contains build output and should typically be ignored, not included.- "ignorePatterns": ["!**/*", ".next/**/*"], + "ignorePatterns": ["node_modules", ".next", "out", "build", "coverage"],📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements."ignorePatterns": ["node_modules", ".next", "out", "build", "coverage"],apps/services/payments/infra/payments.ts (1)
6-13: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueEnvironment configuration needs to be populated with database credentials
The empty environment configuration needs to be populated with the database credentials that are defined in the sequelize config. Based on the codebase analysis:
- The service requires database configuration which includes:
DB_USER_PAYMENTSDB_PASS_PAYMENTSDB_NAME_PAYMENTSDB_PORT_PAYMENTS- In production:
DB_USER,DB_PASS,DB_NAME,DB_HOSTThese environment variables should be added to the
.env()configuration block to ensure proper database connectivity.🔗 Analysis chain
Critical: Environment configuration is missing
The empty environment configuration with a TODO comment needs to be addressed before deployment. For a payments service, essential environment variables typically include:
- API keys/secrets for payment providers
- Webhook endpoints
- Environment-specific configurations
- Database connection details
Let's check if there are any environment variables defined elsewhere:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for environment variable definitions related to payments rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{ts,js,env}' -i 'process\.env.*payment'Length of output: 181
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any environment variables or configuration in the payments service rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{ts,js,env}' -A 5 -B 5 'env\(' apps/services/payments/ # Look for environment variables in potential config files fd -e ts -e js -e env config apps/services/payments/ -x cat {} # Search for environment-related code in the payments service ast-grep --pattern 'env($$$)'Length of output: 3102
apps/payments/pages/_document.tsx (1)
10-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Type the context parameter properly for better type safety.
The
ctxparameter should be typed asDocumentContextfrom next/document for better type safety and IDE support.- static async getInitialProps(ctx: any) { + static async getInitialProps(ctx: DocumentContext) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.static async getInitialProps(ctx: DocumentContext) { const initialProps = await Document.getInitialProps(ctx) return { ...initialProps, lang: ctx?.query?.lang ?? defaultLanguage } } ``` Note: While the diff snippet is correct, the developer would need to ensure that `DocumentContext` is imported from 'next/document' at the top of the file: ```typescript import { DocumentContext } from 'next/document';libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.resolver.ts (3)
10-10:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove TODO type alias and use proper typing.
The
TODOtype alias usinganybypasses TypeScript's type checking. According to the AI summary, you should be usingGetPaymentFlowDTOas the return type.-type TODO = anyCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
17-23:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd proper return type, error handling, and authorization scopes.
The query method has several areas for improvement:
- The return type should be
Promise<GetPaymentFlowDTO>instead ofPromise<TODO>.- Missing error handling for potential service failures.
- No authorization scopes specified despite using ScopesGuard.
Apply this diff to address these issues:
+ import { Scopes } from '@island.is/auth/scopes' + import { GetPaymentFlowDTO } from './dto/getPaymentFlow.dto' - @Query(() => GetPaymentFlowResponse) + @Query(() => GetPaymentFlowResponse) + @Scopes('payments:read') async getPaymentFlow( @Args('input', { type: () => GetPaymentFlowInput }) input: GetPaymentFlowInput, - ): Promise<TODO> { - return this.paymentsService.getPaymentFlow(input) + ): Promise<GetPaymentFlowDTO> { + try { + return await this.paymentsService.getPaymentFlow(input) + } catch (error) { + // Log the error + throw new Error('Failed to retrieve payment flow') + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import { Scopes } from '@island.is/auth/scopes' import { GetPaymentFlowDTO } from './dto/getPaymentFlow.dto' @Query(() => GetPaymentFlowResponse) @Scopes('payments:read') async getPaymentFlow( @Args('input', { type: () => GetPaymentFlowInput }) input: GetPaymentFlowInput, ): Promise<GetPaymentFlowDTO> { try { return await this.paymentsService.getPaymentFlow(input) } catch (error) { // Log the error throw new Error('Failed to retrieve payment flow') } }
6-8: 💡 Codebase verification
DTO types need to be exported through the barrel file for better tree-shaking
The barrel file (index.ts) only exports the module but not the DTO types. For better tree-shaking and reusability, the DTO types should be re-exported through the barrel file.
- Add exports for
GetPaymentFlowInputandGetPaymentFlowResponseinlibs/api/domains/payments/src/index.ts:export * from './lib/payments.module' export * from './lib/dto/getPaymentFlow.input' export * from './lib/dto/getPaymentFlow.response'🔗 Analysis chain
Verify type exports for effective tree-shaking.
Let's ensure that all necessary types are properly exported and can be tree-shaken.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check type exports in the payments domain # Expected: Find barrel files (index.ts) that re-export types and verify type-only exports # Look for barrel files echo "Checking for barrel files in the payments domain..." fd --type f "^index\.ts$" "libs/api/domains/payments" # Check type exports in DTO files echo "Checking type exports in DTO files..." rg --type ts "export (type|interface)" "libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/dto/"Length of output: 370
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of the barrel file and DTO files to verify exports echo "Checking barrel file content:" cat libs/api/domains/payments/src/index.ts echo -e "\nChecking DTO file contents:" fd . libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/dto/ --type f --exec cat {} echo -e "\nChecking if types are used directly or re-exported:" rg --type ts "import.*GetPaymentFlow(Input|Response)" libs/api/domains/payments/srcLength of output: 1956
apps/services/payments/src/app/sequelizeConfig.service.ts (1)
20-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety and error handling in configuration method.
The current implementation could benefit from improved type safety and error handling:
Consider applying these improvements:
- createSequelizeOptions(): SequelizeModuleOptions { - const env = process.env.NODE_ENV || 'development' - const config = (dbConfig as { [key: string]: object })[env] - return { - ...config, - ...getOptions({ logger: this.logger }), - } - } + createSequelizeOptions(): SequelizeModuleOptions { + try { + const env = process.env.NODE_ENV || 'development' + const config = dbConfig[env as keyof typeof dbConfig] + + if (!config) { + throw new Error(`Database configuration for environment '${env}' not found`) + } + + return { + ...config, + ...getOptions({ logger: this.logger }), + } + } catch (error) { + this.logger.error('Failed to create Sequelize configuration', error) + throw error + } + }Additionally:
- Consider extracting 'development' to a constant or environment variable
- Add validation for required configuration properties
- Add JSDoc documentation for the method
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.createSequelizeOptions(): SequelizeModuleOptions { try { const env = process.env.NODE_ENV || 'development' const config = dbConfig[env as keyof typeof dbConfig] if (!config) { throw new Error(`Database configuration for environment '${env}' not found`) } return { ...config, ...getOptions({ logger: this.logger }), } } catch (error) { this.logger.error('Failed to create Sequelize configuration', error) throw error } }apps/payments/components/InvoicePayment/InvoicePayment.tsx (3)
11-13: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and form state management.
The form context implementation is missing error handling and validation feedback:
- const { register } = useFormContext<InvoicePaymentInput>() + const { + register, + formState: { errors }, + } = useFormContext<InvoicePaymentInput>()📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const InvoicePayment = () => { const { register, formState: { errors }, } = useFormContext<InvoicePaymentInput>()
14-35: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding loading and disabled states.
The component should handle form submission states to prevent multiple submissions:
export const InvoicePayment = () => { - const { register } = useFormContext<InvoicePaymentInput>() + const { register, formState: { isSubmitting } } = useFormContext<InvoicePaymentInput>() return ( <> <PaymentContainer> <Input // ... other props + disabled={isSubmitting} /> <Input // ... other props + disabled={isSubmitting} /> </PaymentContainer> </> ) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.return ( <> <PaymentContainer> <Input backgroundColor="blue" label="Kennitala greiðanda" {...register('nationalId', { required: true, })} size="md" disabled={isSubmitting} /> <Input backgroundColor="blue" label="Tilvísun" {...register('reference', { required: false, })} size="md" disabled={isSubmitting} /> </PaymentContainer> </> )
17-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance nationalId input with validation and accessibility.
The national ID input needs:
- Proper format validation
- Error message display
- Accessibility attributes
- Helper text explaining the format
<Input backgroundColor="blue" label="Kennitala greiðanda" {...register('nationalId', { required: true, + pattern: { + value: /^\d{10}$/, + message: 'Please enter a valid 10-digit national ID', + }, })} size="md" + errorMessage={errors.nationalId?.message} + hasError={!!errors.nationalId} + helperText="Enter your 10-digit national ID without spaces" + aria-required="true" + aria-invalid={!!errors.nationalId} />Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/dto/getPaymentFlow.response.ts (1)
31-37: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety for the metadata field.
The metadata field is typed as
stringbut described as JSON data. This could lead to type-safety issues.Consider using a proper TypeScript type:
- metadata?: string + metadata?: Record<string, unknown>Also, consider adding validation to ensure the metadata size doesn't exceed reasonable limits:
+import { MaxLength } from 'class-validator'; @Field(() => GraphQLJSON, { nullable: true, description: 'Arbitrary JSON data provided by the consuming service that will be returned on in callbacks (e.g. onSuccess, onUpdate). Example use case: the service that created the payment flow needs to pass some data that will be returned in the callback', }) + @MaxLength(1000) // Adjust the limit based on your requirements metadata?: Record<string, unknown>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.controller.spec.ts (3)
16-34: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test coverage and assertions.
The current test case has several limitations:
- Only tests the happy path
- Uses placeholder data ('todo' for invoiceId)
- Has minimal assertions
- Lacks type safety for the input parameters
Consider implementing the following improvements:
import { CreatePaymentUrlDto } from './dto/create-payment-url.dto'; describe('createPaymentUrl', () => { let paymentFlowController: PaymentFlowController; let paymentFlowService: jest.Mocked<PaymentFlowService>; beforeEach(() => { paymentFlowController = app.get<PaymentFlowController>(PaymentFlowController); paymentFlowService = app.get(PaymentFlowService); }); it('should create payment URL with valid input', async () => { const mockInput: CreatePaymentUrlDto = { productId: 'product-123', availablePaymentMethods: ['card', 'invoice'], callbacks: { onSuccess: 'https://www.island.is/borga/success', onError: 'https://www.island.is/borga/error', }, organizationId: 'org-123', invoiceId: 'inv-123', }; const expectedUrl = 'https://payment.test/checkout'; jest.spyOn(paymentFlowService, 'createPaymentUrl') .mockResolvedValue({ url: expectedUrl }); const result = await paymentFlowController.createPaymentUrl(mockInput); expect(paymentFlowService.createPaymentUrl).toHaveBeenCalledWith(mockInput); expect(result.url).toBe(expectedUrl); }); it('should throw error for invalid input', async () => { const invalidInput = { // Missing required fields }; await expect( paymentFlowController.createPaymentUrl(invalidInput as CreatePaymentUrlDto) ).rejects.toThrow(); }); });
6-6:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect test suite name.
The describe block is named 'AppController' but should be 'PaymentFlowController' to match the class being tested.
-describe('AppController', () => { +describe('PaymentFlowController', () => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.describe('PaymentFlowController', () => {
9-14:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd proper service mocking.
The PaymentFlowService is currently provided without mocking. In unit tests, we should mock external dependencies to isolate the controller's behavior.
beforeAll(async () => { app = await Test.createTestingModule({ controllers: [PaymentFlowController], - providers: [PaymentFlowService], + providers: [{ + provide: PaymentFlowService, + useValue: { + createPaymentUrl: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ + url: 'https://payment.test/checkout' + }), + }, + }], }).compile() })📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.beforeAll(async () => { app = await Test.createTestingModule({ controllers: [PaymentFlowController], providers: [{ provide: PaymentFlowService, useValue: { createPaymentUrl: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ url: 'https://payment.test/checkout' }), }, }], }).compile() })apps/payments/pages/_app.tsx (3)
7-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance layout structure and SEO meta tags.
The Layout component could be improved in several ways:
- Use semantic HTML structure
- Add essential meta tags
- Use a more specific type than
unknownConsider applying these changes:
-const Layout: FC<React.PropsWithChildren<unknown>> = ({ children }) => { +const Layout: FC<React.PropsWithChildren<{}>> = ({ children }) => { return ( - <div> + <main> <Head> <title>Ísland.is | Greiðslur</title> + <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" /> + <meta name="description" content="Greiðslur á Ísland.is" /> <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" type="image/x-icon" /> </Head> {children} - </div> + </main> ) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const Layout: FC<React.PropsWithChildren<{}>> = ({ children }) => { return ( <main> <Head> <title>Ísland.is | Greiðslur</title> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" /> <meta name="description" content="Greiðslur á Ísland.is" /> <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" type="image/x-icon" /> </Head> {children} </main> ) }
19-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace 'any' types with proper TypeScript definitions.
The component uses 'any' type which reduces type safety. Consider using proper NextJS types.
Apply these changes to improve type safety:
+import type { AppProps } from 'next/app' +import type { ApolloClient, NormalizedCacheObject } from '@apollo/client' -const PaymentsApp: any = ({ Component, pageProps }: any) => { +const PaymentsApp = ({ Component, pageProps }: AppProps & { + pageProps: { + apolloState?: NormalizedCacheObject; + }; +}) => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import type { AppProps } from 'next/app' import type { ApolloClient, NormalizedCacheObject } from '@apollo/client' const PaymentsApp = ({ Component, pageProps }: AppProps & { pageProps: { apolloState?: NormalizedCacheObject; }; }) => { return ( <ApolloProvider client={initApollo(pageProps.apolloState)}> <Layout> <Component {...pageProps} /> </Layout> </ApolloProvider> ) }
29-46: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety and error handling in getInitialProps.
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- Uses 'any' types extensively
- Lacks error handling
- Potential memory leak with Apollo client
Consider applying these changes:
+import type { AppContext } from 'next/app' +import type { GetInitialProps } from 'next/dist/shared/lib/utils' -PaymentsApp.getInitialProps = async (appContext: any) => { +PaymentsApp.getInitialProps = async (appContext: AppContext): Promise<GetInitialProps> => { const { Component, ctx } = appContext - const apolloClient = initApollo({}) + + try { + const apolloClient = initApollo({}) + + const customContext = { + ...ctx, + apolloClient, + } - const customContext = { - ...ctx, - apolloClient, - } - const pageProps = Component.getInitialProps - ? ((await Component.getInitialProps(customContext)) as any) - : {} + const pageProps = Component.getInitialProps + ? await Component.getInitialProps(customContext) + : {} - const apolloState = apolloClient.cache.extract() + const apolloState = apolloClient.cache.extract() - return { - pageProps, - apolloState, + return { + pageProps: { + ...pageProps, + apolloState, + }, + } + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error in getInitialProps:', error) + return { pageProps: {} } } }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
apps/services/payments/test/setup.ts (2)
43-50: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Strengthen test cleanup reliability.
The cleanup hooks should handle errors gracefully and ensure resources are always released, even if cleanup fails.
-beforeEach(truncate) +beforeEach(async () => { + try { + await truncate(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to truncate database:', error); + throw error; + } +}); afterAll(async () => { if (app && sequelize) { - await app.close() - await sequelize.close() + try { + await Promise.all([ + app.close().catch(error => + console.error('Failed to close app:', error) + ), + sequelize.close().catch(error => + console.error('Failed to close sequelize:', error) + ) + ]); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Cleanup failed:', error); + throw error; + } } })📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.beforeEach(async () => { try { await truncate(); } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to truncate database:', error); throw error; } }); afterAll(async () => { if (app && sequelize) { try { await Promise.all([ app.close().catch(error => console.error('Failed to close app:', error) ), sequelize.close().catch(error => console.error('Failed to close sequelize:', error) ) ]); } catch (error) { console.error('Cleanup failed:', error); throw error; } } })
31-41: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance setup reliability and performance.
The setup function could benefit from:
- Proper error handling for database connection and sync
- Optional schema sync (might not be needed for all tests)
- Timeout protection for long-running operations
export const setup = async (options?: Partial<TestServerOptions>) => { + const SETUP_TIMEOUT = 30000; // 30 seconds + try { + const setupPromise = async () => { app = await testServer({ appModule: AppModule, ...options, }) sequelize = await app.resolve(getConnectionToken() as Type<Sequelize>) - await sequelize.sync() + if (options?.syncDatabase !== false) { + await sequelize.sync() + } return app + }; + + return await Promise.race([ + setupPromise(), + new Promise((_, reject) => + setTimeout(() => reject(new Error('Setup timeout')), SETUP_TIMEOUT) + ), + ]); + } catch (error) { + await app?.close(); + await sequelize?.close(); + throw error; + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const setup = async (options?: Partial<TestServerOptions>) => { const SETUP_TIMEOUT = 30000; // 30 seconds try { const setupPromise = async () => { app = await testServer({ appModule: AppModule, ...options, }) sequelize = await app.resolve(getConnectionToken() as Type<Sequelize>) if (options?.syncDatabase !== false) { await sequelize.sync() } return app }; return await Promise.race([ setupPromise(), new Promise((_, reject) => setTimeout(() => reject(new Error('Setup timeout')), SETUP_TIMEOUT) ), ]); } catch (error) { await app?.close(); await sequelize?.close(); throw error; } }apps/payments/components/PaymentHeader/PaymentHeader.tsx (3)
14-48: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance component structure and accessibility
Several improvements can be made to the component:
- Use semantic HTML
- Move styles to CSS
- Add image loading optimization
- Improve accessibility
Consider these improvements:
export const PaymentHeader = ({ organizationTitle, organizationImageSrc, organizationImageAlt, amount, productTitle, }: PaymentHeaderProps) => { return ( - <> + <header role="banner"> <Box> {organizationTitle && ( <Box display="flex" marginTop={3} marginBottom={1}> - <Text color="purple400" variant="eyebrow"> + <Text color="purple400" variant="eyebrow" as="h2"> {organizationTitle} </Text> </Box> )} - <Text variant="h1"> + <Text variant="h1" as="h1"> {amount && todoCallGlobalFormatUtilFunction(amount)} </Text> <Text variant="default" fontWeight={'medium'}> {productTitle} </Text> </Box> {organizationImageSrc && ( <img - style={{ width: 64, height: 64 }} + className="organization-logo" + width={64} + height={64} src={organizationImageSrc} alt={organizationImageAlt} + loading="lazy" + onError={(e) => { + e.currentTarget.style.display = 'none'; + }} /> )} - </> + </header> ) }Add the following CSS module:
.organization-logo { width: 64px; height: 64px; object-fit: contain; }
11-12:
⚠️ Potential issueReplace temporary formatting function with proper utility
The current implementation has several issues:
- Uses a temporary solution (todo prefix)
- Lacks input validation
- Has hardcoded currency
- Missing internationalization support
Consider using the built-in
Intl.NumberFormat:-const todoCallGlobalFormatUtilFunction = (value: number): string => - `${value.toString().replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, '.')} kr.` +const formatCurrency = (value: number, locale = 'is-IS'): string => { + if (!Number.isFinite(value) || value < 0) { + throw new Error('Invalid amount'); + } + return new Intl.NumberFormat(locale, { + style: 'currency', + currency: 'ISK' + }).format(value); +}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const formatCurrency = (value: number, locale = 'is-IS'): string => { if (!Number.isFinite(value) || value < 0) { throw new Error('Invalid amount'); } return new Intl.NumberFormat(locale, { style: 'currency', currency: 'ISK' }).format(value); }
1-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety for props
The type definitions could be enhanced for better type safety:
organizationImageAltshould be required whenorganizationImageSrcis presentamountshould be constrained to positive numbersConsider updating the type definition:
type PaymentHeaderProps = { organizationTitle?: string organizationImageSrc?: string - organizationImageAlt?: string + organizationImageAlt?: organizationImageSrc extends string ? string : never amount?: number productTitle?: string +} & { + amount?: number extends infer T ? T extends number ? T extends NonNegative<T> ? T : never : never : never } + +type NonNegative<T extends number> = `${T}` extends `-${string}` ? never : TCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
apps/payments/components/PaymentSelector/PaymentSelector.tsx (2)
38-39: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement internationalization for button text
The button labels are currently hardcoded in Icelandic. Consider using a translation system for better maintainability and internationalization support.
- Kortagreiðsla + {t('paymentSelector.cardPayment')} // ... - Krafa í heimabanka + {t('paymentSelector.invoicePayment')}Also applies to: 47-48
1-1: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unused imports
The following imports appear to be unused in this component:
Link,Logo,Text, andInput.-import { Box, Link, Logo, Text, Button, Input } from '@island.is/island-ui/core' +import { Box, Button } from '@island.is/island-ui/core'Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.controller.ts (4)
27-37:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect documentation description.
The documentation description states "Creates a new PaymentFlow" but this GET endpoint retrieves existing payment information.
Apply this diff to fix the documentation:
@Documentation({ description: - 'Creates a new PaymentFlow initialised with PaymentInformation.', + 'Retrieves payment flow information by ID.', response: { status: 200, type: GetPaymentFlowDTO }, })📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.@Get(':id') @Documentation({ description: 'Retrieves payment flow information by ID.', response: { status: 200, type: GetPaymentFlowDTO }, }) getPaymentInfo( @Param('id', new ParseUUIDPipe()) id: string, ): Promise<GetPaymentFlowDTO | null> { return this.paymentFlowService.getPaymentInfo(id) }
48-50:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove debug console.log statements.
Debug console.log statements should not be present in production code. Consider using a proper logging service if debugging information is needed.
- console.log('Create payment url') - console.log(paymentInfo)Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
45-51: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling.
The
createPaymentUrlmethod should include error handling to gracefully handle potential failures from the payment service.createPaymentUrl( @Body() paymentInfo: PaymentInformation, ): Promise<CreatePaymentUrlResponse> { - return this.paymentFlowService.createPaymentUrl(paymentInfo) + try { + return this.paymentFlowService.createPaymentUrl(paymentInfo) + } catch (error) { + // Log the error using a proper logging service + throw new InternalServerErrorException('Failed to create payment URL') + } }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
1-52: 💡 Codebase verification
Test coverage is insufficient
The current test implementation lacks coverage for several critical endpoints and scenarios:
- Missing tests for
getPaymentInfoendpoint- No validation tests for UUID parameter
- No error handling tests
- Minimal assertion in the existing test (only checks if URL is a string)
Required test additions:
getPaymentInfoendpoint tests:
- Successful retrieval with valid UUID
- Invalid UUID handling
- Non-existent payment flow handling
createPaymentUrlendpoint tests:
- Invalid payment information handling
- More specific URL format validation
- Service error handling
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify test coverage.
As per coding guidelines, ensure that unit tests are implemented for this controller, covering:
- Successful payment flow retrieval
- UUID validation
- Payment URL creation
- Error scenarios
Let me check the complete test file content to better assess the test coverage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if test file exists and contains necessary test cases fd "paymentFlow.controller.spec.ts" apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/ --exec cat {} \; | grep -E "describe|it\("Length of output: 277
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get full content of the test file fd "paymentFlow.controller.spec.ts" apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/ --exec cat {}Length of output: 1170
apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/dtos/getPaymentFlow.dto.ts (3)
1-3: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add class-validator decorators for runtime validation.
While Swagger decorators provide API documentation, adding class-validator decorators would ensure runtime validation of the DTO properties.
Add the following import:
import { IsUUID, IsString, IsArray, IsUrl, IsObject, IsOptional } from 'class-validator';
24-29: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Define an enum for payment methods.
Using string literals for payment methods could lead to inconsistencies. Consider defining an enum to ensure type safety and consistency.
Create a new file
paymentMethods.enum.ts:export enum PaymentMethod { CARD = 'card', INVOICE = 'invoice', }Then apply this diff:
+ import { PaymentMethod } from './paymentMethods.enum'; @ApiProperty({ description: 'List of allowed payment methods for this payment flow', - type: [String], + enum: PaymentMethod, + isArray: true, example: ['card', 'invoice'], }) + @IsArray() + @IsEnum(PaymentMethod, { each: true }) - availablePaymentMethods!: string[] + availablePaymentMethods!: PaymentMethod[]
4-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation decorators to payment identifier properties.
While the types and Swagger documentation are good, adding validation decorators would ensure runtime validation of these critical identifiers.
Apply this diff:
@ApiProperty({ description: 'Unique identifier for the payment flow', type: String, format: 'uuid', }) + @IsUUID() id!: string @ApiProperty({ description: 'Identifier for the product being paid for', type: String, }) + @IsString() productId!: string @ApiPropertyOptional({ description: 'Optional identifier for an invoice associated with the payment flow', type: String, }) + @IsOptional() + @IsString() invoiceId?: string📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.@ApiProperty({ description: 'Unique identifier for the payment flow', type: String, format: 'uuid', }) @IsUUID() id!: string @ApiProperty({ description: 'Identifier for the product being paid for', type: String, }) @IsString() productId!: string @ApiPropertyOptional({ description: 'Optional identifier for an invoice associated with the payment flow', type: String, }) @IsOptional() @IsString() invoiceId?: stringapps/payments/components/CardPayment/CardPayment.tsx (4)
13-15:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for form context
The component assumes the form context will always be available. Consider adding error handling:
export const CardPayment = () => { + if (!useFormContext) { + throw new Error('CardPayment must be used within a FormProvider') + } const { register, formState } = useFormContext<CardPaymentInput>()Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
19-33:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove card number validation and add internationalization
The current validation has several limitations:
- Simple regex pattern doesn't validate card numbers properly
- Missing Luhn algorithm check
- No card type detection
- Hardcoded Icelandic strings
Consider implementing:
- Proper card validation using a dedicated library
- Card type detection for dynamic validation
- Internationalization for labels and messages
+import { validateCardNumber } from '@island.is/shared/validators' +import { useTranslation } from 'next-i18next' export const CardPayment = () => { + const { t } = useTranslation() // ... <Input backgroundColor="blue" - label="Kortanúmer" + label={t('payment.card.number')} placeholder="**** **** **** ****" size="md" {...register('card', { required: true, - pattern: { - value: /^[0-9]{13,19}$/, - message: 'Kortanúmer er ekki rétt', - }, + validate: { + cardNumber: (value) => + validateCardNumber(value) || t('payment.card.invalid'), + } })} errorMessage={formState.errors.card?.message} />Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
34-64:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd proper validation and formatting for expiry date and CVC
Current implementation lacks:
- Proper expiry date format validation (MM/YY)
- Future date validation for expiry
- CVC length validation
- Input masking
- Accessibility attributes
<Input backgroundColor="blue" - label="Gildistími" + label={t('payment.card.expiry')} + aria-label={t('payment.card.expiry.aria')} {...register('cardExpiry', { required: true, + pattern: { + value: /^(0[1-9]|1[0-2])\/([0-9]{2})$/, + message: t('payment.card.expiry.format'), + }, + validate: { + future: (value) => { + const [month, year] = value.split('/') + const expiry = new Date(2000 + parseInt(year), parseInt(month) - 1) + return expiry > new Date() || t('payment.card.expiry.past') + }, + }, })} + inputMode="numeric" + maxLength={5} placeholder="MM / ÁÁ" size="md" /> // ... similar improvements for CVC inputConsider extracting the validation logic into a shared utility and using a proper input masking library for better user experience.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
1-68: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Critical: Direct card data handling requires immediate security measures
The current implementation directly handles sensitive card data without proper security measures. The findings show:
- No payment gateway integration in the payments app
- Basic CSP headers exist but are insufficient for payment handling
- Error boundaries exist in other apps but not in the payments component
Required actions:
- Integrate a PCI-compliant payment gateway (e.g., Stripe, Adyen) instead of handling card data directly
- Implement the payment gateway's secure iframe/SDK solution
- Add an error boundary specifically for the payment flow
- Enhance CSP headers to allow payment gateway domains
- Remove direct card data handling from the form
🔗 Analysis chain
Implement PCI DSS compliance measures
The component handles sensitive card data directly. Consider:
- Using a secure payment gateway's SDK/iframe
- Implementing proper data sanitization
- Adding security headers
- Implementing proper error boundaries
Let me gather more information about security configurations and payment handling.
Let me check for error boundaries and payment processing implementations with corrected commands.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other instances of direct card data handling rg -l "card.*number|cvv|cvc" --type ts --type tsx # Check for security headers configuration fd "next.config" --exec cat {} \; | grep -i "security"Length of output: 172
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for security headers and CSP configuration rg -A 5 "contentSecurityPolicy|securityHeaders" --type js --type ts # Look for payment gateway integrations rg -l "stripe|checkout|payment.*gateway" --type ts --type js # Check for error boundaries near payment components fd "error.*boundary|boundary" --type ts --type tsx --exec cat {} \;Length of output: 838
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for error boundary implementations rg -l "ErrorBoundary" # Look for payment processing implementations and configurations rg -A 5 "payment.*process|stripe.*config|checkout.*config" # Check for any existing payment gateway integrations in the payments app fd . apps/payments -t f -e ts -e tsx -e js | xargs rg "gateway|processor|stripe|checkout"Length of output: 6679
apps/services/payments/migrations/20241031000000.js (1)
4-61: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add essential database optimizations and constraints
While the basic table structure is good, consider the following improvements for production readiness:
- Add indexes for frequently queried fields:
product_id: { type: Sequelize.STRING, allowNull: false, + index: true }, organisation_id: { type: Sequelize.STRING, allowNull: false, + index: true },
- Add length constraints to prevent oversized data:
product_id: { - type: Sequelize.STRING, + type: Sequelize.STRING(100), allowNull: false, },
- Add URL validation:
on_success_url: { type: Sequelize.STRING, allowNull: false, + validate: { + isUrl: true + } },
- Consider adding audit fields:
+created_by: { + type: Sequelize.STRING, + allowNull: false, +}, +modified_by: { + type: Sequelize.STRING, + allowNull: false, +},Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.service.ts (3)
20-37:
⚠️ Potential issueReplace hardcoded URL with configuration-based URL.
The hardcoded localhost URL is not suitable for production use. This should be replaced with a configurable base URL.
- url: `http://localhost:3333/payments/${result.id}`, + url: `${this.configService.get('PAYMENT_BASE_URL')}/payments/${result.id}`,Don't forget to inject ConfigService:
constructor( @Inject(ConfigService) private configService: ConfigService, // ... other dependencies ) {}
33-36: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling with specific error types.
The current error handling loses the original error context. Consider using NestJS's built-in HTTP exceptions or custom exception types.
- throw new Error('Failed to create payment url') + throw new InternalServerErrorException('Failed to create payment url', { + cause: e, + description: 'Error occurred while creating payment flow entry' + });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.} catch (e) { this.logger.error('Failed to create payment url', e) throw new InternalServerErrorException('Failed to create payment url', { cause: e, description: 'Error occurred while creating payment flow entry' }); }
39-61:
⚠️ Potential issueRevise error handling strategy.
The current implementation swallows errors and returns null, which might hide important issues. Consider:
- Using specific error types for different scenarios
- Maintaining consistent error handling patterns with createPaymentUrl
- } catch (e) { - this.logger.error('Fail to get payment flow', e) - return null - } + } catch (e) { + this.logger.error('Failed to get payment flow', e) + if (e.message === 'Payment flow not found') { + throw new NotFoundException('Payment flow not found'); + } + throw new InternalServerErrorException('Failed to retrieve payment flow', { + cause: e + }); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async getPaymentInfo(id: string): Promise<PaymentInformation | null> { try { const result = ( await this.paymentFlowModel.findOne({ where: { id, }, }) )?.toJSON() if (!result) { throw new Error('Payment flow not found') } return { ...result, availablePaymentMethods: result.availablePaymentMethods as PaymentMethod[], } } catch (e) { this.logger.error('Failed to get payment flow', e) if (e.message === 'Payment flow not found') { throw new NotFoundException('Payment flow not found'); } throw new InternalServerErrorException('Failed to retrieve payment flow', { cause: e }); }apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/models/paymentFlow.model.ts (4)
24-47: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add indexes and validation for better performance and data integrity.
Consider adding these improvements:
- Index on
product_idfor faster lookups- Unique constraint on
invoice_idif it represents a unique business entity- Validation for
product_idformat@Column({ type: DataType.STRING, allowNull: false, field: 'product_id', + validate: { + notEmpty: true, + is: /^[A-Za-z0-9-_]+$/i, + }, + indexes: [{ + name: 'idx_payment_flow_product_id', + using: 'BTREE', + }], })Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
81-94: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety for metadata and add organization validation.
- The
metadatafield should have a defined interface instead of genericobject- Add validation for
organisationIdformat+interface PaymentFlowMetadata { + customerReference?: string; + department?: string; + tags?: string[]; + [key: string]: unknown; +} - metadata?: object + metadata?: PaymentFlowMetadata @Column({ type: DataType.STRING, allowNull: false, field: 'organisation_id', + validate: { + notEmpty: true, + is: /^[A-Za-z0-9-]+$/i, + }, })📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.@ApiProperty() @Column({ type: DataType.STRING, allowNull: false, field: 'organisation_id', validate: { notEmpty: true, is: /^[A-Za-z0-9-]+$/i, }, }) organisationId!: string interface PaymentFlowMetadata { customerReference?: string; department?: string; tags?: string[]; [key: string]: unknown; } @ApiPropertyOptional({ type: Object }) @Column({ type: DataType.JSON, allowNull: true, }) metadata?: PaymentFlowMetadata
49-80:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance type safety and validation for payment-specific fields.
- The
availablePaymentMethodsshould use an enum instead of string[] to restrict valid values- URL fields should include URL format validation
- Consider adding HTTPS enforcement for production environments
+export enum PaymentMethod { + CREDIT_CARD = 'CREDIT_CARD', + DEBIT_CARD = 'DEBIT_CARD', + BANK_TRANSFER = 'BANK_TRANSFER', +} - availablePaymentMethods!: string[] + availablePaymentMethods!: PaymentMethod[] @Column({ type: DataType.STRING, allowNull: false, field: 'on_success_url', + validate: { + isUrl: true, + isHttps(value: string) { + if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' && !value.startsWith('https://')) { + throw new Error('Production URLs must use HTTPS'); + } + }, + }, })Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
1-111: 💡 Codebase verification
Module Registration and Test Coverage Issues Found
The PaymentFlow model implementation requires attention in the following areas:
- The model is not properly registered in the SequelizeModule.forFeature() within PaymentFlowModule
- Current test coverage only includes service tests, missing model-specific tests
- Module configuration is incomplete, missing necessary database model registration
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify module integration and test coverage.
The model implementation follows NestJS patterns correctly. Please ensure:
- The model is properly registered in the module's
providersarray- Unit tests cover model validation and constraints
- Integration tests verify database operations
Let me gather more information about the module registration and test coverage.
Let me check the module configuration and model registration details.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify model registration in module ast-grep --pattern 'imports: [$$$] { $$$PaymentFlow$$$ }' # Check for test coverage rg -l "describe.*PaymentFlow" --glob "*.spec.ts"Length of output: 181
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check module registration ast-grep --pattern 'class PaymentFlowModule { $$$ }' # Check model imports in the module rg -l "import.*PaymentFlow.*model" --type ts # Look at test content for coverage rg "describe.*PaymentFlow" -A 5 --glob "*.spec.ts"Length of output: 1003
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check module providers and imports rg -A 10 "class PaymentFlowModule" apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.module.ts # Check if model is registered in providers rg "providers.*PaymentFlow" apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.module.ts # Check database configuration ast-grep --pattern '@Module({ $$$ imports: [$$$SequelizeModule$$$], $$$ })'Length of output: 349
apps/payments/components/PageCard/PageCard.tsx (2)
27-31: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add prop types validation and default values
The component should validate required props and provide proper TypeScript defaults:
export const PageCard = ({ headerSlot, bodySlot, - headerColorScheme = 'primary', + headerColorScheme = HeaderColorScheme.Primary, }: PageCardWrapperProps) => { + if (!headerSlot || !bodySlot) { + throw new Error('HeaderSlot and bodySlot are required props') + }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
67-85: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract footer and improve accessibility
The footer section should be:
- Extracted into a separate component
- Enhanced with proper accessibility attributes
- Use configuration constants for URLs
+const URLS = { + terms: 'https://island.is/skilmalar-island-is', + help: 'https://island.is/minar-sidur-adgangsstyring' +} as const + +const PageFooter = () => ( <footer className={styles.footer}> <Box display="flex" justifyContent="spaceBetween" alignItems="center"> - <LinkV2 href="https://island.is/skilmalar-island-is" skipTab> + <LinkV2 href={URLS.terms} skipTab aria-label="Island.is terms"> <Logo width={120} /> </LinkV2> <Box display="flex" columnGap={2}> - <LinkV2 href="#" color="blue400"> + <LinkV2 href="#" color="blue400" aria-label="Switch to English"> English </LinkV2> <span className={styles.linkSeparator} /> <LinkV2 - href="https://island.is/minar-sidur-adgangsstyring" + href={URLS.help} color="blue400" + aria-label="Get help" > Aðstoð </LinkV2>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
apps/services/payments/project.json (4)
41-50: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add test coverage thresholds.
Enforce code quality by adding coverage thresholds to the Jest configuration.
"options": { - "jestConfig": "apps/services/payments/jest.config.ts" + "jestConfig": "apps/services/payments/jest.config.ts", + "coverageThreshold": { + "global": { + "branches": 80, + "functions": 80, + "lines": 80, + "statements": 80 + } + }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
75-88: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add environment configuration to migrations.
Migration commands should respect environment-specific configurations.
"options": { - "command": "sequelize-cli db:migrate", + "command": "cross-env NODE_ENV=${NODE_ENV:-development} sequelize-cli db:migrate", "cwd": "apps/services/payments" }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
8-25: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add production build optimizations.
The production configuration is empty. Consider adding optimization settings for production builds to improve performance and reduce bundle size.
"configurations": { "development": {}, - "production": {} + "production": { + "optimization": true, + "extractLicenses": true, + "inspect": false, + "fileReplacements": [ + { + "replace": "apps/services/payments/src/environments/environment.ts", + "with": "apps/services/payments/src/environments/environment.prod.ts" + } + ] + }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
51-67: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add health checks to dev-init.
The initialization sequence should include health checks to ensure services are ready.
"commands": [ "yarn nx run services-payments:dev-services", + "wait-on tcp:5432 -t 60000", "yarn nx run services-payments:migrate" ],Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
.github/CODEOWNERS (1)
105-105: 💡 Codebase verification
Ownership assignment needs to be reviewed for consistency
The codebase has multiple payment-related paths with different ownership assignments:
/libs/clients/payments→@island-is/aranja/libs/clients/payment-schedule→@island-is/norda/libs/api/domains/payment→@island-is/norda-applications- Several payment-related paths under
/apps/payments/*and/apps/services/payments/*are currently unassignedRecommendations:
- Review and align ownership of related payment modules (
paymentvspayment-schedule)- Add ownership entries for the unassigned payment-related paths under
/apps/*- Consider consolidating ownership under a single team for better maintainability
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Ownership assignment follows established patterns.
The assignment of
/libs/clients/paymentsto@island-is/aranjais consistent with their ownership of other client libraries.Let's verify if there are any other payment-related paths that might need ownership assignment:
Let's check the current ownership assignments for payment-related paths to ensure consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for payment-related paths in the codebase fd -t d "payment" -x echo "Found directory: {}"Length of output: 3471
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check CODEOWNERS entries for payment-related paths rg -i "payment" .github/CODEOWNERSLength of output: 1022
apps/payments/graphql/client.ts (2)
15-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace deprecated
process.browserwithtypeof window !== 'undefined'.The use of
process.browseris deprecated in Next.js. To check if the code is running in the browser, usetypeof window !== 'undefined'instead for better compatibility with future Next.js versions.Apply this diff to update the check:
-const isBrowser: boolean = process.browser +const isBrowser: boolean = typeof window !== 'undefined'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const isBrowser: boolean = typeof window !== 'undefined'
48-55:
⚠️ Potential issueImplement secure authentication by removing hardcoded tokens.
The
authLinkuses a hardcoded'mock_token', which is insecure and unsuitable for production. Implement proper authentication by retrieving a valid token for the user session.Apply this diff to remove the hardcoded token and prepare for actual authentication:
- const token = 'mock_token' + const token = await getAuthToken() // Implement this function to securely retrieve the tokenEnsure that you handle token retrieval asynchronously if necessary and manage token refresh logic as required.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
apps/payments/pages/[locale]/[paymentFlowId].tsx (6)
114-118:
⚠️ Potential issueImplement fetching of product information from TBR
There is a TODO comment indicating that product information should be fetched from TBR (The Business Registry). Implement this functionality to retrieve accurate product data.
Do you want assistance in implementing the product information fetching logic or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
150-152:
⚠️ Potential issueImplement the form submission logic
The
onSubmithandler currently only logs the form data. Implement the actual submission logic, such as processing the payment or navigating to a confirmation page.
188-190:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd an onClick handler to the 'Cancel' button
The 'Cancel' button currently does not have an
onClickhandler, so clicking it will not perform any action. Consider adding anonClickhandler to handle the cancellation logic, such as redirecting the user or resetting the form.Apply this diff to add an
onClickhandler:<Button colorScheme="white" fluid + onClick={() => { + // Implement cancellation logic here, e.g., redirect to a different page + }}> Hætta við </Button>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
174-178: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use dynamic payment methods from 'paymentFlow' instead of hardcoding
The
availablePaymentMethodsprop is currently hardcoded as['card', 'invoice']. To ensure accuracy and flexibility, usepaymentFlow.availablePaymentMethodsto populate the payment methods dynamically based on the data fetched.Apply this diff to use dynamic payment methods:
<PaymentSelector - availablePaymentMethods={['card', 'invoice']} + availablePaymentMethods={paymentFlow.availablePaymentMethods} selectedPayment={selectedPaymentMethod as any} onSelectPayment={setSelectedPaymentMethod} />Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
81-81: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid using the 'any' type and resolve the TODO comment
The variable
paymentFlowis typed asany, which undermines TypeScript's type safety. Please specify the correct type forpaymentFlowto enhance type safety and code clarity. Additionally, address the TODO comment about "used before initialization" to prevent potential runtime errors.Apply this diff to specify the correct type and initialize the variable properly:
-let paymentFlow: any = null // TODO look into type "used before initialization" +let paymentFlow: Query['getPaymentFlow'] | null = null📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.let paymentFlow: Query['getPaymentFlow'] | null = null
85-112:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove error handling in 'getServerSideProps'
Currently, when an error occurs during data fetching, the error is logged to the console, but no fallback action is taken. This could result in undefined data being passed to the page, leading to runtime errors. Consider redirecting the user to an error page or returning an appropriate error status code.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
} catch (e) { console.error(e) + return { + notFound: true, + } }This will display the 404 error page if data fetching fails.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const { data: { getPaymentFlow }, } = await client.query<Query, QueryGetPaymentFlowArgs>({ query: GetPaymentFlow, variables: { input: { id: paymentFlowId, }, }, }) paymentFlow = getPaymentFlow const { data: { getOrganization }, } = await client.query<Query, QueryGetOrganizationArgs>({ query: GetOrganization, variables: { input: { slug: getPaymentFlow.organisationId, }, }, }) organization = getOrganization } catch (e) { console.error(e) return { notFound: true, } }
Datadog ReportAll test runs ❌ 99 Total Test Services: 1 Failed, 90 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
❌ Failed Tests (11)
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (7)
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16745 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 35.73% 35.69% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 6926 6928 +2
Lines 147700 148209 +509
Branches 42074 42406 +332
==========================================
+ Hits 52776 52904 +128
- Misses 94924 95305 +381
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 50 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
apps/services/payments/src/environment/environment.ts (2)
1-3: Consider adding environment-specific configurations.The current setup might need to be extended to handle different environments (development, staging, production).
Consider:
- Adding more environment-specific configurations (e.g., database, API keys)
- Implementing environment-specific validation rules
- Using a configuration library like
@nestjs/configfor more robust environment handlingWould you like me to provide an example implementation using
@nestjs/config?
1-3: Add comprehensive JSDoc documentation.The configuration would benefit from detailed documentation explaining its purpose and usage.
+/** + * Environment configuration for the payments microservice. + * @property {number} port - The port number for the service (1-65535). + * Can be configured via PORT environment variable. + * Defaults to 3333 if not specified. + */ export const environment = { port: process.env.PORT || 3333, }apps/payments/pages/_app.tsx (1)
1-6: Add type definitions for Apollo state.Consider adding proper TypeScript interfaces for Apollo state to improve type safety.
interface ApolloState { [key: string]: any; // Replace with specific cache shape } interface PageProps { apolloState?: ApolloState; }apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.controller.ts (2)
23-23: Consider moving type definition to a separate fileThe
CreatePaymentUrlResponsetype should be moved to a dedicated types file (e.g.,types/responses.ts) for better organization and reusability.
35-44: Enhance endpoint documentationWhile the basic documentation is present, consider adding:
- Error responses (404 for not found)
- Example response payload
- Description of when null might be returned
Example improvement:
@Documentation({ description: 'Retrieves payment flow information by ID.', + summary: 'Get payment flow details', response: { status: 200, type: GetPaymentFlowDTO }, + responses: { + 404: { description: 'Payment flow not found' } + } })apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/dtos/getPaymentFlow.dto.ts (1)
1-3: Consider adding class-transformer for type conversion.For robust type conversion and transformation, especially when handling incoming requests, consider importing and using
@Transformdecorator fromclass-transformer.import { ApiProperty, ApiPropertyOptional } from '@nestjs/swagger' import { IsArray, IsEnum } from 'class-validator' +import { Transform } from 'class-transformer' import { PaymentMethod } from '../../../types'apps/services/payments/migrations/20241031000000-create-payment_flows.js (3)
1-2: Remove redundant 'use strict' directiveThe 'use strict' directive is unnecessary as JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode.
-'use strict' -🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
4-61: Add indexes for frequently queried fieldsConsider adding indexes for fields that will be frequently used in queries:
product_idinvoice_idorganisation_idThis will improve query performance, especially as the table grows.
organisation_id: { type: Sequelize.STRING, allowNull: false, + references: { + model: 'organisation', + key: 'id' + } },
47-56: Add audit fields for tracking changesConsider adding
created_byandmodified_byfields to track who created/modified the payment flow. This is crucial for audit trails in payment systems.created: { type: Sequelize.DATE, allowNull: false, defaultValue: Sequelize.NOW, }, +created_by: { + type: Sequelize.STRING, + allowNull: false, +}, modified: { type: Sequelize.DATE, allowNull: false, defaultValue: Sequelize.NOW, }, +modified_by: { + type: Sequelize.STRING, + allowNull: false, +},apps/payments/components/CardPayment/CardPayment.tsx (1)
1-11: Enhance type safety for form handlingConsider improving type safety by:
- Importing specific types from react-hook-form
- Adding proper validation types for card fields
-import { useFormContext } from 'react-hook-form' +import { useFormContext, FieldValues } from 'react-hook-form' interface CardPaymentInput { - card: string - cardExpiry: string - cardCVC: string + card: string & { length: 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 } + cardExpiry: `${string}/${string}` + cardCVC: string & { length: 3 | 4 } }libs/feature-flags/src/lib/features.ts (1)
109-109: Consider following the established naming pattern for the string value.Most feature flags in this file use descriptive string values that match their enum key names. Consider updating the string value to be more consistent:
- isIslandisPaymentEnabled = 'islandisPayment', + isIslandisPaymentEnabled = 'isIslandisPaymentEnabled',apps/payments/pages/[locale]/[paymentFlowId].tsx (1)
32-57: Consider adding error type definitions for GraphQL queries.While the queries are well-structured, adding error type definitions would improve type safety and error handling.
Consider adding error types:
type PaymentFlowError = { code: string; message: string; }; type OrganizationError = { code: string; message: string; };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
apps/payments/components/CardPayment/CardPayment.tsx(1 hunks)apps/payments/components/PaymentSelector/PaymentSelector.tsx(1 hunks)apps/payments/pages/[locale]/[paymentFlowId].tsx(1 hunks)apps/payments/pages/_app.tsx(1 hunks)apps/payments/pages/_document.tsx(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/migrations/20241031000000-create-payment_flows.js(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/dtos/createPaymentFlow.dto.ts(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/dtos/getPaymentFlow.dto.ts(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.controller.ts(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.service.ts(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/src/environment/environment.ts(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/src/main.ts(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/src/types/payment.ts(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/test/globalSetup.ts(1 hunks)libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/dto/getPaymentFlow.response.ts(1 hunks)libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.resolver.ts(1 hunks)libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.service.ts(1 hunks)libs/feature-flags/src/lib/features.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
- apps/payments/components/PaymentSelector/PaymentSelector.tsx
- apps/payments/pages/_document.tsx
- apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/dtos/createPaymentFlow.dto.ts
- apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.service.ts
- apps/services/payments/src/main.ts
- apps/services/payments/src/types/payment.ts
- apps/services/payments/test/globalSetup.ts
- libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/dto/getPaymentFlow.response.ts
- libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.resolver.ts
- libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.service.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (8)
apps/payments/components/CardPayment/CardPayment.tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/payments/pages/[locale]/[paymentFlowId].tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/payments/pages/_app.tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/services/payments/migrations/20241031000000-create-payment_flows.js (2)
Pattern apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
- Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
- Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/dtos/getPaymentFlow.dto.ts (2)
Pattern apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
- Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
- Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.controller.ts (2)
Pattern apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
- Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
- Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/services/payments/src/environment/environment.ts (2)
Pattern apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
- Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
- Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/feature-flags/src/lib/features.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🪛 Biome
apps/services/payments/migrations/20241031000000-create-payment_flows.js
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.
(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
apps/payments/pages/_app.tsx (1)
31-48: Consider using modern NextJS data fetching methods.
Instead of getInitialProps, consider using getStaticProps or getServerSideProps at the page level for better performance and static optimization.
Let's check if other pages are using modern data fetching methods:
apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.controller.ts (1)
25-33: Controller setup follows NestJS best practices
The implementation correctly uses:
- API versioning
- Feature flag guards
- Dependency injection
- Swagger tags
Let's verify the feature flag configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Feature flag configuration is correctly implemented
The feature flag isIslandisPaymentEnabled is properly defined in the feature flags enum with the value 'islandisPayment' and is correctly used in the PaymentFlowController. The implementation follows the established pattern for feature flag usage in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify feature flag configuration
rg -l "isIslandisPaymentEnabled" --type ts
Length of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the feature flag definition
cat libs/feature-flags/src/lib/features.ts
Length of output: 5744
apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/dtos/getPaymentFlow.dto.ts (3)
5-12: LGTM! Well-documented base structure.
The class definition and ID property are properly decorated and documented following NestJS best practices.
26-35: LGTM! Comprehensive validation for payment methods.
The payment methods array is well-validated using both @IsArray() and @IsEnum() decorators, with clear API documentation and examples.
1-69: Verify controller implementation for this DTO.
The DTO implementation follows NestJS best practices. Let's verify its usage in the controller.
✅ Verification successful
DTO implementation and usage verified successfully
The GetPaymentFlowDTO is properly implemented and used in the PaymentFlow controller:
- Correctly used as return type in
getPaymentInfoendpoint - Proper parameter validation with
ParseUUIDPipe - Appropriate Swagger documentation using
@Documentationdecorator - Follows NestJS architectural patterns for DTOs and controllers
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the proper usage of GetPaymentFlowDTO in controllers
# Test: Search for controller files using this DTO
echo "Searching for controller usage of GetPaymentFlowDTO..."
rg -l "GetPaymentFlowDTO" --type ts
# Test: Verify proper parameter decoration in controllers
echo "Verifying parameter decoration..."
ast-grep --pattern '@Param() $param: GetPaymentFlowDTO'
Length of output: 517
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the controller implementation to verify proper DTO usage
# Check the controller implementation
echo "Checking PaymentFlow controller implementation..."
rg "GetPaymentFlowDTO" apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.controller.ts -B 2 -A 5
# Look for return type usage
echo "Checking return type usage..."
ast-grep --pattern 'async $methodName($$$): Promise<GetPaymentFlowDTO>'
# Check for proper decorator usage on the controller method
echo "Checking controller method decorators..."
ast-grep --pattern '@Get($$$)
$$$
async $methodName($$$): Promise<$_> {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1151
apps/services/payments/migrations/20241031000000-create-payment_flows.js (1)
63-67: LGTM! Down migration is properly implemented
The down migration correctly handles the table removal within a transaction.
libs/feature-flags/src/lib/features.ts (1)
107-109: LGTM! Feature flag addition looks good.
The new feature flag is well-placed and properly documented with a clear section comment.
apps/payments/pages/[locale]/[paymentFlowId].tsx (1)
1-30: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.
The imports are logically grouped and the PaymentPageProps interface is well-defined with all necessary types.
apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.controller.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
apps/services/payments/src/environments/environment.ts (2)
1-2: Add type safety for environment detectionConsider using a type-safe approach for environment detection to prevent potential errors.
-const isProduction = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' +type NodeEnv = 'development' | 'test' | 'production' +const nodeEnv = process.env.NODE_ENV as NodeEnv +const isProduction = nodeEnv === 'production'
3-10: Add TypeScript interfaces for configurationDefine interfaces for the configuration object to improve type safety and documentation.
interface AuditConfig { defaultNamespace: string groupName: string serviceName: string | undefined } interface Environment { audit: AuditConfig port: number } export default { // ... existing configuration } as Environmentlibs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.module.ts (1)
1-13: LGTM! Consider adding module documentation.The module structure follows NestJS best practices and properly implements the necessary dependencies. The code is well-organized and supports reusability across different apps.
Consider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the module's purpose and responsibilities:
+/** + * Module responsible for handling payment-related operations. + * Integrates with the payments microservice through ClientsPaymentsModule + * and supports feature flagging for payment features. + */ @Module({ imports: [ClientsPaymentsModule, FeatureFlagModule], providers: [PaymentsResolver, PaymentsService], }) export class ApiDomainsPaymentsModule {}apps/payments/clients/configcat.ts (1)
8-8: Add readonly modifier to prevent accidental reassignmentThe client variable should be protected from unintended modifications.
-let configCatClient: configcat.IConfigCatClient | null = null +let configCatClient: Readonly<configcat.IConfigCatClient> | null = nulllibs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.resolver.ts (1)
21-27: Consider enhancing error handling and input validation.While the basic implementation is solid, consider these improvements:
- Add explicit error handling for potential service failures
- Consider adding class-validator decorators to the input DTO for additional validation
Example enhancement:
@Query(() => GetPaymentFlowResponse) async getPaymentFlow( @Args('input', { type: () => GetPaymentFlowInput }) input: GetPaymentFlowInput, ): Promise<GetPaymentFlowResponse> { - return this.paymentsService.getPaymentFlow(input) + try { + return await this.paymentsService.getPaymentFlow(input) + } catch (error) { + // Log the error for monitoring + this.logger.error('Failed to get payment flow', { error, input }) + throw new GraphQLError('Failed to process payment flow request') + } }apps/payments/infra/payments.ts (2)
17-21: Add documentation and type safety for secrets configurationConsider adding documentation about the required secrets and their purpose. Also, add type safety for the secrets configuration.
+interface SecretsConfig { + SI_PUBLIC_CONFIGCAT_SDK_KEY: string; + SI_PUBLIC_DD_RUM_APPLICATION_ID: string; + SI_PUBLIC_DD_RUM_CLIENT_TOKEN: string; +} +/** + * Required secrets: + * - CONFIGCAT_SDK_KEY: Feature flag management + * - DD_RUM_APPLICATION_ID: Datadog RUM application identifier + * - DD_RUM_CLIENT_TOKEN: Datadog RUM client token + */ - .secrets({ + .secrets<SecretsConfig>({ SI_PUBLIC_CONFIGCAT_SDK_KEY: '/k8s/configcat/CONFIGCAT_SDK_KEY', SI_PUBLIC_DD_RUM_APPLICATION_ID: '/k8s/DD_RUM_APPLICATION_ID', SI_PUBLIC_DD_RUM_CLIENT_TOKEN: '/k8s/DD_RUM_CLIENT_TOKEN', })
46-52: Enhance health check configurationConsider using separate endpoints for readiness and liveness probes, and add probe configuration parameters for better reliability.
- .readiness('/liveness') - .liveness('/liveness') + .readiness('/health/ready', { + initialDelaySeconds: 10, + periodSeconds: 10, + timeoutSeconds: 5, + failureThreshold: 3, + }) + .liveness('/health/live', { + initialDelaySeconds: 15, + periodSeconds: 20, + timeoutSeconds: 5, + failureThreshold: 3, + }) .grantNamespaces( 'nginx-ingress-internal', 'nginx-ingress-external', 'islandis', )apps/payments/pages/[locale]/[paymentFlowId].tsx (2)
34-59: Consider using GraphQL codegen for type safety.While the queries are well-structured, consider using GraphQL Code Generator to automatically generate TypeScript types for your queries. This would provide better type safety and autocompletion.
142-214: Consider implementing loading states and analytics.The component handles error states well, but could benefit from:
- Loading states during form submission
- Analytics tracking for payment flow steps
- Integration with a payment monitoring system
This would improve the user experience and provide better insights into payment flows.
charts/islandis/values.dev.yaml (1)
1802-1804: Consider revising the base path.The base path '/gredisla' seems cryptic and doesn't align with the PR description which mentions '/payments'. Consider using a more descriptive and consistent path.
- BASEPATH: '/gredisla' + BASEPATH: '/payments'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
apps/payments/clients/configcat.ts(1 hunks)apps/payments/infra/payments.ts(1 hunks)apps/payments/next.config.js(1 hunks)apps/payments/pages/[locale]/[paymentFlowId].tsx(1 hunks)apps/payments/project.json(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/infra/payments.ts(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/src/app/app.module.ts(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.controller.ts(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.module.ts(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/src/environments/environment.ts(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/src/environments/index.ts(1 hunks)apps/services/payments/src/main.ts(1 hunks)charts/islandis/values.dev.yaml(2 hunks)infra/src/uber-charts/islandis.ts(3 hunks)libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.module.ts(1 hunks)libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.resolver.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/services/payments/src/environments/index.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- apps/payments/next.config.js
- apps/payments/project.json
- apps/services/payments/src/app/app.module.ts
- apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.controller.ts
- apps/services/payments/src/app/paymentFlow/paymentFlow.module.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (8)
apps/payments/clients/configcat.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/payments/infra/payments.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/payments/pages/[locale]/[paymentFlowId].tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/services/payments/infra/payments.ts (2)
Pattern apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
- Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
- Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/services/payments/src/environments/environment.ts (2)
Pattern apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
- Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
- Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/services/payments/src/main.ts (2)
Pattern apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
- Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
- Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.module.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.resolver.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (15)
apps/services/payments/src/main.ts (2)
1-5: LGTM! Clean import structure following NestJS conventions.
The imports are well-organized, utilizing the shared infrastructure package and maintaining clear separation of concerns between application module, API configuration, and environment settings.
7-16: Verify database health check implementation.
The health check configuration enables database monitoring, but we should verify the database connection setup.
✅ Verification successful
Database health check implementation is properly configured
The database health check is correctly implemented with:
- Sequelize database configuration through
SequelizeModule.forRootAsync - Health check controller using
SequelizeHealthIndicatorfor database monitoring - Proper timeout and error handling in the health check endpoint
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if database connection is properly configured
# Expected: Find TypeOrmModule or similar database configuration
# Look for database configuration in the app module
ast-grep --pattern 'TypeOrmModule.forRoot({
$$$
})'
# Check for environment variables related to database connection
rg -l "DATABASE_" apps/services/payments/src/environments/
Length of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's broaden our search to find database-related configurations
# Search for any database-related imports and configurations
rg -i "typeorm|database|connection" apps/services/payments/src/ -A 5
# Look for health module configuration
ast-grep --pattern 'TerminusModule.forRoot({
$$$
})'
# Check for database-related health indicators
rg -i "healthindicator|health.indicator" apps/services/payments/src/
# Look for database configuration in any format
ast-grep --pattern 'createConnection({
$$$
})'
# Check for environment configuration files
fd -e ts environment apps/services/payments/src/
Length of output: 757
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the health module implementation in the infrastructure library
# Check the health module implementation
cat libs/infra-nest-server/src/lib/infra/health/health.module.ts
# Look for database health indicators in the infrastructure library
rg -i "database.*indicator" libs/infra-nest-server/src/lib/infra/health/
# Check environment configuration
cat apps/services/payments/src/environments/environment.ts
Length of output: 1491
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the health controller implementation and database-related health checks
# Check the health controller implementation
cat libs/infra-nest-server/src/lib/infra/health/health.controller.ts
# Look for any TypeORM or database-related files in the payments service
fd -e ts typeorm apps/services/payments/src/
fd -e ts database apps/services/payments/src/
# Check app module for database configuration
cat apps/services/payments/src/app/app.module.ts
Length of output: 2140
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Sequelize configuration service implementation
# Check the sequelize config service
cat apps/services/payments/src/app/sequelizeConfig.service.ts
# Look for any database models
fd -e ts model apps/services/payments/src/
Length of output: 960
libs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.module.ts (1)
9-12: Verify module integration with AppModule.
Let's verify that this module is properly integrated into the main application as mentioned in the summary.
✅ Verification successful
Module integration is properly verified
The verification confirms:
- The module is correctly imported in
apps/api/src/app/app.module.ts - Both
PaymentsResolverandPaymentsServiceclasses are properly implemented with their respective dependencies - The service integration chain is complete: Resolver -> Service -> PaymentsApi
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the module's integration in the main application
# Test: Check if the module is imported in AppModule
rg -l "ApiDomainsPaymentsModule" "apps/api/src/app"
# Test: Verify the existence and implementation of the dependent classes
ast-grep --pattern 'class PaymentsResolver {
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'class PaymentsService {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1820
apps/services/payments/infra/payments.ts (3)
1-5: LGTM: Clean and clear constant definitions
The imports and constant definitions follow good practices with clear naming conventions and logical namespace construction.
7-12: Verify database configuration requirements
The service is configured with database and migrations support, but there's no explicit configuration for connection parameters or migration strategies.
#!/bin/bash
# Check for database configuration patterns in the codebase
echo "Searching for database configuration patterns..."
rg -l "DATABASE_" apps/services/payments/
echo "Checking for migration files..."
fd -t f "migration" apps/services/payments/16-18: Review health check endpoint implementation
While the health check configuration is present, there are a few considerations:
- Both readiness and liveness probes point to the same endpoint
- The 'islandis' namespace access grant implies cross-service communication
Consider implementing separate endpoints for readiness and liveness probes to provide more granular health monitoring:
- Readiness: Database connectivity, external service availability
- Liveness: Basic application health
apps/payments/clients/configcat.ts (1)
15-17: Let me check if there's any documentation or configuration files that might specify the requirements for feature flag updates.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ConfigCat related documentation or configuration
rg -i "configcat|feature.?flag" --type mdlibs/api/domains/payments/src/lib/payments.resolver.ts (2)
1-13: LGTM! Well-organized imports with clear separation of concerns.
The imports are logically grouped and all are utilized in the implementation.
18-28: LGTM! Clean resolver implementation with proper typing.
The implementation follows TypeScript best practices and maintains good separation of concerns.
apps/payments/infra/payments.ts (1)
1-8: Verify the basepath and consider adding type annotations
The basepath '/gredisla' seems unusual. Please verify if this is the intended path for the payments application. Additionally, consider adding type annotations for better type safety.
-const namespace = 'payments'
-const serviceName = `${namespace}-web`
-const image = `${namespace}-image`
-const basepath = '/gredisla'
+const namespace: string = 'payments'
+const serviceName: string = `${namespace}-web`
+const image: string = `${namespace}-image`
+const basepath: string = '/gredisla'apps/payments/pages/[locale]/[paymentFlowId].tsx (2)
1-32: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.
The imports and type definitions follow Next.js best practices and maintain proper TypeScript type safety.
1-214: Verify Next.js routing implementation.
Let's verify the proper setup of dynamic routes and their integration with the payment flow.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the locale handling implementation.
Let me check one final aspect regarding the locale types and any potential locale-specific components.
Next.js routing implementation is correctly configured
The dynamic routing setup follows Next.js best practices with:
- Proper nested dynamic routes using
[locale]and[paymentFlowId]parameters - Well-defined locale handling with type-safe constants (
IS,EN) - Appropriate fallback redirect to default locale when invalid locale is provided
- Clean separation of locale constants and types
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Next.js routing setup for payment pages
# Check if the page is properly placed for dynamic routing
fd --type f "\\[.*\\]\\.tsx$" "apps/payments/pages"
# Verify existence of required route handlers
fd --type f "api" "apps/payments/pages"
# Check for proper locale handling in other pages
rg -l "ALLOWED_LOCALES" "apps/payments"
Length of output: 255
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the locale constants implementation
cat apps/payments/utils/constants.ts
# Look for any middleware handling for locale routing
fd --type f "middleware" "apps/payments"
# Check for any other locale-related routing logic
rg -A 5 "ALLOWED_LOCALES" "apps/payments"
Length of output: 1484
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check locale type definition
cat apps/payments/utils/localisation.ts
# Look for locale-specific components or utilities
rg -l "locale" "apps/payments/components"
Length of output: 130
infra/src/uber-charts/islandis.ts (1)
19-21: LGTM: Import statements are clear and follow the existing pattern.
The new imports for payment services follow the established pattern of importing service setups from their respective infrastructure directories.
charts/islandis/values.dev.yaml (2)
1797-1798: LGTM: New namespaces added correctly.
The addition of 'payments' and 'services-payments' namespaces aligns with the PR objectives for isolating the new payment webapp and microservice.
2516-2591: LGTM: Microservice configuration follows best practices.
The services-payments configuration includes all necessary components:
- Proper database configuration
- Migration handling
- Health checks
- Security contexts
- Appropriate secrets management
|
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 1f612e1.
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
What
Bootstrapping 2 new projects
apps/paymentsweb application for end usersapps/services/paymentsmicroservice to handle payment flowsAdding 2 new libs
libs/clients/paymentsgenerated client from the openapi config of the microservicelibs/api/domains/paymentsto communicate with microservice using the client aboveWhy
Specify why you need to achieve this
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Documentation
Bug Fixes
Tests