Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rust: initial builtin types: TAI64N and UUID #98

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2020
Merged

Conversation

tony-iqlusion
Copy link
Member

Adds TAI64N timestamps and UUIDs as types which can be encoded as Veriform messages.

Veriform "builtins" are the equivalent of Protobufs "well-known types".

Adds [TAI64N] timestamps and UUIDs as types which can be encoded as
Veriform messages.

Veriform "builtins" are the equivalent of Protobufs "well-known types".

[TAI64N]: https://crates.io/crates/tai64
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 28, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #98 into develop will decrease coverage by 4.16%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop      #98      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    75.47%   71.31%   -4.17%     
===========================================
  Files           13       15       +2     
  Lines          685      725      +40     
===========================================
  Hits           517      517              
- Misses         168      208      +40
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
rust/src/builtins/uuid.rs 0% <0%> (ø)
rust/src/builtins/tai64.rs 0% <0%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4c874f7...b86fd20. Read the comment docs.

@tony-iqlusion tony-iqlusion merged commit b025b58 into develop Feb 28, 2020
@tony-iqlusion tony-iqlusion deleted the builtins branch February 28, 2020 09:30
@tony-iqlusion tony-iqlusion mentioned this pull request May 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant