Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rust: use displaydoc for Error type; MSRV 1.40+ #91

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2020

Conversation

tony-iqlusion
Copy link
Member

displaydoc provides a no_std-friendly procedural macro for creating Display impls from documentation comments:

https://github.com/yaahc/displaydoc

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 27, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #91 into develop will increase coverage by 1.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop      #91      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    78.57%   79.58%   +1.01%     
===========================================
  Files           14       13       -1     
  Lines          630      622       -8     
===========================================
  Hits           495      495              
+ Misses         135      127       -8

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cd84c7d...a5fd8b4. Read the comment docs.

`displaydoc` provides a `no_std`-friendly procedural macro for creating
`Display` impls from documentation comments:

https://github.com/yaahc/displaydoc
@tony-iqlusion tony-iqlusion changed the title rust: use displaydoc for the Error type's Display impl rust: use displaydoc for Error type; MSRV 1.40+ Feb 27, 2020
@tony-iqlusion tony-iqlusion merged commit 3991e9e into develop Feb 27, 2020
@tony-iqlusion tony-iqlusion deleted the rust/displaydoc branch February 27, 2020 05:17
@tony-iqlusion tony-iqlusion mentioned this pull request May 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants