This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 29, 2022. It is now read-only.
Tweak foundations intro: no callout to typesystems #151
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It's true that type systems and schema tooling is important and we care a lot about it, but it doesn't quite need an explicit shout at the very top of the document -- we get into it later.
vmx
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2019
Stebalien
pushed a commit
to Stebalien/specs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2019
faster chain sync protocol, interem solution
prataprc
pushed a commit
to iprs-dev/ipld-specs
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2020
Tweak foundations intro: no callout to typesystems
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's true that type systems and schema tooling is important and we care a lot about it, but it doesn't quite need an explicit shout at the very top of the document -- we get into it later. Replaced it with some comments about continuity instead -- part of the purpose of our 'foundations' document should be keeping us going in a particular direction and (eventually, finite!) scope in addition to guiding improvements :)
Extracted from #148 and regards earlier review in #146 (comment) .