"block rm": make channel large enough to avoid blocking #3418
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Make the channel for the output of RmBlocks large enough to hold any result to avoid blocking while holding the GCLock. License: MIT Signed-off-by: Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]>
ghost
mentioned this pull request
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make the channel for the output of RmBlocks large enough to hold any result to avoid blocking while holding the GCLock. Otherwise if you remove a large number of blocks and do something like:
The GCLock will be held indefinitely blocking all pinning related operations.