Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

flatten multipart transfers #2046

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 28, 2015
Merged

flatten multipart transfers #2046

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 28, 2015

Conversation

whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

This is based on #2039 so wait until it merges to review this.

But this removes the whole recursive multipart thing.

The multipart 'Next()' bug in #1688 is what i set out to fix, but that was apparently fixed in go version 1.5.2

@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Dec 14, 2015

#2039 is merged -- will review this next

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jeromy <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jeromy <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jeromy <[email protected]>
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping force-pushed the fix/multipart branch 2 times, most recently from 63dcd20 to a9f0c12 Compare December 28, 2015 16:56
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jeromy <[email protected]>
@@ -86,23 +88,9 @@ Some-Header: beep

beep
--Boundary!
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=OtherBoundary
Content-Type: application/x-directory
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should test file inside the directory as well

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jeromy <[email protected]>
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Jeromy <[email protected]>
@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member Author

cool, addressed your concerns @dignifiedquire merging.

whyrusleeping added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2015
flatten multipart transfers
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping merged commit 9e9aa4c into dev0.4.0 Dec 28, 2015
@ghost ghost deleted the fix/multipart branch January 22, 2017 04:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic/files Topic files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants