Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: run AutoNAT V2 service in addition to V1 #10468

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024

Conversation

lidel
Copy link
Member

@lidel lidel commented Aug 5, 2024

This PR is part of #10091 proposed by @sukunrt.

It enables V2 (libp2p/specs#538) alongside V1, and adds configuration option that allows disabling V2 (just in case).

TODO

  • EnableAutoNATv2 in addition to V1 by default
  • configuration option to restore old default (run V1-only)
  • changelong

#10436

@lidel lidel marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2024 23:00
@lidel lidel requested a review from a team as a code owner August 5, 2024 23:00
@lidel lidel force-pushed the feat/enable-autonatv2-service branch from eb1d184 to 8a957aa Compare August 6, 2024 14:01
Base automatically changed from feat/enable-webrtc-direct to master August 6, 2024 19:25
Part of #10091
We include a flag that allows shutting down V2 in case there are issues
with it.
@lidel lidel force-pushed the feat/enable-autonatv2-service branch from db3bc16 to 1108d4e Compare August 6, 2024 19:29
Copy link
Member Author

@lidel lidel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Merging to maximize testing window before 0.30.0-rc1.
Configuration/docs can be refined in follow-up PRs.

@lidel lidel merged commit ffab7b2 into master Aug 6, 2024
14 checks passed
@lidel lidel deleted the feat/enable-autonatv2-service branch August 6, 2024 19:51
@lidel lidel mentioned this pull request Aug 8, 2024
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant