Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[api] Fix not reject unprotected && unwhitelisted action #4510

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

envestcc
Copy link
Member

@envestcc envestcc commented Dec 3, 2024

Description

This issue did not trigger any invalid actions to be included in the block, so it only needs to be fixed at the API level.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • [] make test
  • [] fullsync
  • [] Other test (please specify)

Test Configuration:

  • Firmware version:
  • Hardware:
  • Toolchain:
  • SDK:

Checklist:

  • [] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • [] I have performed a self-review of my code
  • [] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • [] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • [] My changes generate no new warnings
  • [] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • [] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • [] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@envestcc envestcc changed the title [api] Reject unprotected && unwhitelisted action [api] Fix unprotected && unwhitelisted action not reject Dec 3, 2024
@envestcc envestcc changed the title [api] Fix unprotected && unwhitelisted action not reject [api] Fix not reject unprotected && unwhitelisted action Dec 3, 2024
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ func (ws *workingSet) runAction(
}
// for replay tx, check against deployer whitelist
g := genesis.MustExtractGenesisContext(ctx)
if selp.Encoding() == uint32(iotextypes.Encoding_ETHEREUM_UNPROTECTED) && !g.IsDeployerWhitelisted(selp.SenderAddress()) {
if !selp.Protected() && !g.IsDeployerWhitelisted(selp.SenderAddress()) {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The behavior has not actually changed because the encoding here will not be the Encoding_TX_CONTAINER, so a hardfork is not needed.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 3, 2024

@dustinxie dustinxie merged commit 3c5408c into iotexproject:master Dec 3, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants