Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IOTEX-1025 update consensus messages #1038

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 16, 2019

Conversation

CoderZhi
Copy link
Collaborator

To eliminate confusion.

@CoderZhi CoderZhi requested a review from a team as a code owner April 16, 2019 19:00
@CoderZhi CoderZhi force-pushed the update_consensus_message branch from 7833f48 to ef61a3e Compare April 16, 2019 19:00
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1038 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 50%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1038      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   54.29%   54.28%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         159      159              
  Lines       13631    13631              
==========================================
- Hits         7401     7399       -2     
- Misses       5244     5245       +1     
- Partials      986      987       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
consensus/scheme/rolldpos/rolldposctx.go 61.98% <50%> (ø) ⬆️
db/trie/extensionnode.go 57.62% <0%> (-1.7%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5325782...6646d88. Read the comment docs.

@zjshen14 zjshen14 merged commit a6a1b17 into iotexproject:master Apr 16, 2019
zjshen14 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2019
@CoderZhi CoderZhi deleted the update_consensus_message branch April 17, 2019 00:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants