-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Latest fcs #1122
Merged
Merged
Latest fcs #1122
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
95eba33
Update FCS to 43.7.400-preview.23319.6
nojaf 9a41ef0
Process API changes up to 43.7.400-preview.23319.6
nojaf dae6eb5
Add langversion from args.
nojaf e652eb4
Don't suggest a missing parameter for AutoProperty.
nojaf 27f4445
no XML parameter section for AutoProperties
dawedawe 74a6951
Merge pull request #2 from dawedawe/latest-fcs
nojaf 8152637
symbolUseWorkspace2!
nojaf 37fc3b7
Maybe this can be reomoved completey, as it doesn't seem to be used. …
dawedawe 019e04b
Merge pull request #3 from dawedawe/latest-fcs
nojaf 18474ba
- Update to Ionide.ProjInfo nightly
dawedawe e5acb8d
Merge pull request #4 from dawedawe/pr/nojaf/1122
nojaf 3d8856b
consolidate to use new TryGetSymbolUses
dawedawe da5382a
Merge pull request #5 from dawedawe/latest-fcs
nojaf File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we keep a separate implementation or could you leave a comment for why there's a second implementation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yes, we still mean to clean that up. Not sure if we should rename or consider moving everything to the v2 implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made a version that uses v2 for everything and takes the simplest approach 😏
nojaf#5
@TheAngryByrd Let me know, if you prefer a version that keeps the symbol(s) in it's return type.