Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update jupyterlab versions #586

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged

Conversation

sramakintel
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Update JAX jupyter requirements to eliminate CVEs in requirejs.

Related Issue

Changes Made

  • The code follows the project's coding standards.
  • No Intel Internal IP is present within the changes.
  • The documentation has been updated to reflect any changes in functionality.

Validation

  • I have tested any changes in container groups locally with test_runner.py with all existing tests passing, and I have added new tests where applicable.

Signed-off-by: Srikanth Ramakrishna <[email protected]>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:
  • ✅ 0 vulnerable package(s)
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
  • ⚠️ 2 package(s) with unknown licenses.
See the Details below.

License Issues

jax/jupyter-requirements.txt

PackageVersionLicenseIssue Type
jupyterhub5.2.1NullUnknown License
jupyterlab4.3.1NullUnknown License

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
pip/jupyterhub 5.2.1 🟢 5.6
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 8Found 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
License🟢 9license file detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities⚠️ 013 existing vulnerabilities detected
pip/jupyterlab 4.3.1 🟢 5.6
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 9Found 24/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
License🟢 9license file detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 2badge detected: InProgress
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
SAST🟢 10SAST tool is run on all commits
Signed-Releases⚠️ 0Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during GetBranch(4.3.x): error during branchesHandler.query: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Vulnerabilities⚠️ 019 existing vulnerabilities detected
pip/notebook 7.3.0rc0 🟢 4.2
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review⚠️ 2Found 6/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
License🟢 10license file detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ 0Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during GetBranch(7.2.x): error during branchesHandler.query: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities⚠️ 025 existing vulnerabilities detected

Scanned Files

  • jax/jupyter-requirements.txt

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Integration Test Results

Groups Tested: jax/tests

Results
Test-Group Test Status
jax/tests jax-import-idp PASS
jax/tests jax-import-pip PASS
jax/tests jax-import-jupyter-idp PASS
jax/tests jax-import-jupyter-pip PASS
jax/tests jax-xpu-example-idp PASS
jax/tests jax-xpu-example-pip PASS

Overall Result: PASS ✅

@sramakintel sramakintel merged commit 91e09c6 into main Jan 6, 2025
37 checks passed
@sramakintel sramakintel deleted the sramakr1/jax-jupyter-update branch January 6, 2025 18:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants